|
News
* Tributes*
*Tributes* Knockin On Heaven's Door
I Am A Proud Member Of:
|
And out of the corner strolls the man dressed
in his usual tan trench coat attire. He turns and faces the camera,
staring menacingly at anyone who dares to stare back. Then he opens his
mouth and utters those familiar words.
"Today on Unsolved Mysteries, we are looking for two men who seemingly
have disappeared off of the face of the Earth. We're going to uncover
their whereabouts today, as well as see what they have been up to
recently. Also today, we're going to look at some other perplexing and
disturbing mysteries. I am your host Robert Stack, and this is Unsolved
Mysteries."
Mark Madden has enjoyed an incredible amount of success working for
ESPN radio. He is not nationally televised, nor does he ever expect to
be. He feels he is too controversial and doesn't fit in with what ESPN
radio has on the air right now. Many of his ardent fans disagree. He
seems content right now working out of his home base of Pittsburgh,
airing facts, trading insults, and flying in the face of conventional
wisdom by not playing down to the crowd.
The Disco Inferno has been a bit more difficult to track down. He seems
to have gone into hiding a little bit deeper than Mark Madden. After the
fall of the WCW, he had a brief tryout with the WWE, but nothing much
came of it. He was not hired by the WWE, so he set out going through the
various independent affiliations. He worked a number of house shows
throughout the east, and eventually made his way over to the orient as
well.
Now that Unsolved Mysteries has cleared up that little question, there
are others out there that have been raised. Some need addressed and will
be looked into, while many more will linger on for an eternity.
1. Why is the WWE just now pushing the Big Show? Did they finally
realize that they have a 7 foot monster on their roster after 4 years?
2. Whatever happened to Chris Jericho's push? He got a solid push at the
Royal Rumble, but then it was spoiled by HBK. The only way that will
work is if HBK does the job for Y2J. Since HBK's buddy HHH never jobbed
for Jericho, I doubt HBK will either.
3. Did anyone care that the Undertaker returned?
4. Why did the WWE see fit to place all the smaller, harder working
wrestlers first in the Royal Rumble, and then only allow two to go any
length of time (Y2J and RVD)?
5. What will the WWE do now that Steiner has proven what he can and what
he CANNOT do?
6. Who is going to work with HHH?
7. Why is it Benoit can be in match after match that can be considered
match of the year candidates, yet he has never been a champ? The one
time he became champ isn't even recognized, since he threw the belt
away. He puts on a great match with Angle, loses cleanly, and now the
question is what will he do next?
8. Does HHH v. Steiner rate as one of the worst big matches of all-time?
9. WIll Bishoff survive or will McMahon do to him what he did to the
NWO?
10. When Kevin Nash comes back, will anyone care?
11. Where would the Testicles be without Stacy Kiebler? And how does
someone like Test score someone like Stacy?
12. Why did the WWE go from NO storytelling to killing off Al Wilson.
That's kind of going from one extreme to the other.
13. Is the WWE going to form a new Four Horsemen? And is that a good
thing?
14. I have always loved managers and valets, so it is good to see the
WWE try and bring some back. However, the WWE needs more than what they
have.
15. Will the WWE get over the complete debacle that was the Raw X?
Here's an even bigger mystery; where were all the past superstars that
they were supposedly contacting to be at the show? The only one there
was the Rock, via satellite. I think that is a big misconception as
well. It wasn't the content of what he was saying that had people
booing. It was the fact that he wasn't even there. But seriously, no
Austin, no Bret Hart, no Mick Foley, no Hogan, no Savage, no Piper, no
Nash, no Sable, no Sunny, so basically nothing. And on a side note; why
did the WWE basically forget about the first five years of existence
when remembering the ten years Raw has been on. There was nothing on
there from 1993-1996. The oldest match they had on there was from 1997.
16. So, until the WWE celebrates Raw XX, and doesn't acknowledge
anything we've just talked about....keep reading...sincerely the Novak
Notebook.
The Monster
The monster is one of the most mythic creatures in our
culture. They are the creatures that are either misunderstood, or they
are the creatures that are going to wreak havoc all over everything they
touch. The are larger than life and they are outcasts from society.
Frankenstein. The Creature from the Black Lagoon. Godzilla. the
Incredible Hulk. The creatures in Predator and Aliens. Freddy Krueger.
Jason Vorhees. Michael Myers. Leatherface. Pinhead. Serial Killers. The
Unabomber. Charles Manson. Timothy McVeigh. All of them are monsters,
either real or imaginary. They are designed for the same thing; to
instill fear on whoever crosses their paths.
Every good movie has a villain whose larger than life. They are big
monsters who either want to control the world or want to destroy it.
Every good hero needs a good villain. Every larger than life hero needs
a monster that can't be stopped. Superman had Doomsday. Batman had the
Joker. Spiderman had the Green Goblin. James Bond had Goldfinger. The
Allies during World War II had the Nazis. All of these are memorable and
will go down in history are more than just a mere fight.
Well, the wrestling world has its share of monsters too. For every Hulk
Hogan there is a King Kong Bundy. For every Bruno Sammartino there is a
Haystack Calhoun. The wrestling world has always had larger than life
heroes and meaner than ever monsters that couldn't be stopped.
Somewhere along the way something happened. The monster isn't around
anymore. The only monsters we have anymore are the likes of Goldberg or
Lesnar. Lesnar started as a villain and monster, but was quickly changed
into a face. Goldberg started as a face and ended there too.
The world of wrestling doesn't build the monsters anymore. They don't
make anyone dominating anymore. They don't have anyone who just crushes
his opponents and doesn't care. They have villains who are weak, or
soft, or run and hide behind other people and let them do all of the
dirty work. This is something the wrestling world needs to work on.
Where did they go wrong? Vince McMahon has always prided himself of
having larger than life monsters, but that hasn't been the case lately.
He starts out with monsters, but it quickly falls apart from there.
The last two monsters the WWF has done correctly were quite a long time
ago. One was the Undertaker when he first came out, and the other was
King Kong Bundy. What do they have in common? They were both built up
over a long period of time and the climax was a match against the
Immortal One; Hulk Hogan.
If you think I'm crazy, you're not alone. However, if you think I'm
wrong just look at the history. Roddy Piper even during Wrestlmania II
was starting to get cheered during his boxing match with Mr. T. Roddy
Piper was one of the biggest heels going and was truly one of the most
hated men ever in the world of professional wrestling. He was reviled,
threatened, chased, and hounded. Yet, the fans started to cheer for him
against his foe. Look what happened. Roddy Piper came back from
Hollywood and became a face. Vince couldn't very well have his top
monster (even though he wasn't huge, he was still larger than life)
being cheered by the fans.
You have the Undertaker. He was hated. he was despised for what he did
to the Macho Man. He was teaming with Jake Roberts who was hated right
up there with everyone else. Yet, the WWF kept building him, and
building him only to have the fans to start to cheer the man. Once
again, the match was the Undertaker against Hulk Hogan, and with the
help of Ric Flair, the Undertaker downed the Immortal One. People
started to cheer, both because of the new man the Undertaker and the
freshness of his character, and the fact people were starting to tire of
Hulk Hogan. Vince had yet another decision to make. So, he had the
Undertaker turn on Jake Roberts and had a showdown with the man at
Wrestlemania VIII. Since then, he has been at the top of the card, be it
as a heel or as a face.
Then you have Brock Lesnar. He started out as the next big monster. He
was dominating, but people were loving him. They despised his
mouthpiece, Paul Heyman, which was the only reason people were booing.
Everyone knew that as soon as Paul was out of the picture, Lesnar would
be the next big face. He has gotten huge pops since he left Paul in the
dust, and there hasn't been any turning back.
Then you look around. The WWF has had the likes of Andre the Giant. Big
John Studd. The Giant Gonzales. Earthquake. Tugboat. The Berzerker. The
Warlord. Psycho Sid. Yokozuna. The Road Warriors. Vader. And now the WWE
has the Big Show, as well as Rikishi and Three Minute Warning. Some of
these men have had success, and some have been complete disasters. Some
were the faults of the men themselves, but one thing can be said. The
WWF/WWE has not handled any of these men as well as they should have.
I mean are you kidding me? The Big Show, Andre the Giant, and Vader
should've been champs for a good bit of their runs in the federation.
Andre had a title run of a whole five minutes. The Big Show has had two
forgettable title runs, and Vader was nowhere on the radar screen. All
of the men named above have been misused, but none as badly as the three
named above.
Andre was undefeated for fifteen years. He was the big monster of his
time, yet the WWF turned him into a hero. It turned out to be a great
move, because he was one of the most popular men of the WWF. He was the
gentle giant, yet the WWF saw fit never to give him a title run. That
was wrong. He got into silly feuds. Seriously, he was big and larger
than life, but how many of his feuds can you name from the 70s or 80s.
It wasn't until Big John Studd came along that he had someone to fight.
Andre was put into handicap matches, and stupid angles, but generally
Vince McMahon Sr. knew he would attract no matter what he did with the
man. It took a heel turn prior to Wrestlemania III before he got any
recognition in a title hunt. It was silly, and it was too bad that Andre
was toward the end of his career and couldn't move nearly as well as he
could in his prime. Overall, it was just a tragic waste of a large
talented man.
The Big Show came into the WWF with a bang. He went through the steel
cage from under the ring and threw Stone Cold Steve Austin around like a
rag doll. What has he done since? He's had two brief title runs, but
outside of that the most he's been memorable for was fighting with the
Bossman over his daddy's casket. This is a man who used to be able to do
a moonsault off the top rope, and do drop-kicks, yet here he is feuding
with the likes of the Bossman, X-Pac, and Shane McMahon! Now the WWE is
trying to build him up, but nobody can take him seriously, because the
WWE didn't know what to do with him. They turned him into a big goof
(even though he was hilarious, it didn't make him look good) or had him
losing to guys less than half his size. How can anyone take him
seriously after seeing all of that? The WWE wasted their shot at either
having another Andre, or just a big bad monster who would wreak havoc
whenever and wherever he wanted.
This all started with Vader. Vader came into the WWF with a bang. He
blitzed Gorilla Monsoon (ala Three Minute Warning) and put him out of
action. Roddy Piper took over, but wanted nothing to do with Vader. He
was a monster, and everything was hitting on all cylinders. He wasn't
going to be stopped, and it looked as if he was going to rule the WWF
for a long time to come. He could move, he was agile, and he was mean.
He wasn't going to be stopped, and he was going to destroy everything
that got in his way. No prisoners.
What happened? Does anyone remember him? He lost to X-Pac? He LOST to
X-Pac. Now, X-Pac is talented in his own right, but there is no way he
should've ever been able to put up a fight against Vader, let alone beat
the man. Vader should've just rolled over guys like that, but he ended
up jobbing to everyone and anyone. He probably upset someone in the
back, and he paid for it the rest of the time he was in the WWF. He left
a broken man, and went back to Japan. He is a hero in Japan and when he
went back to Japan he once again dominated wrestling in Japan. He was as
misused as anyone in WWF history, and it was more tragic than any
gimmick they had going at the time.
Now the WWE has a team called Three Minute Warning. They did the same
thing with them that they did with Vader. They came in and crushed
people who weren't wrestlers. I got suspicious right away. I was
wondering why they weren't coming in and crushing wrestlers. They
didn't, and when they finally had a match, they struggled against their
opponents. They haven't been as dominating in their matches as they were
when they came in. Now, they're just another team. William Regal and
Lance Storm have had more title reigns than Three Minute Warning. Why
haven't they come in and taken over? The WWE just doesn't want to have
anyone who is a heel be dominating. I wonder why, because if they did
that, the actual confrontation between the monsters and the huge hero
would be amazing.
Look at those confrontations. They built up King Kong Bundy for nearly
a year. He squashed his Wrestlemania I opponent. After that, they built
him with the five count he demanded after he squashed his opponents to
end the match. He rolled for the next year, until the huge confrontation
with Hulk Hogan at Wrestlemania II. After Wrestlemania II, the WWF
started to build Andre toward the next Wrestlemania. The WWF was heading
in the right direction.
But since Vader, the WWF seems to be swimming around without any
direction. The had Sid, but didn't know whether the make him a heel or
face. Diesel started as a heel, but turned face for his title reign.
Yokozuna was a mammoth heel and was promoted correctly for some time,
but then they teamed him with Owen Hart, taking him away from the title
picture all together. Fine, that was a great tag-team and worth
watching. But he never really returned to the title picture as the WWF
started to focus on more of its younger and more athletic wrestlers such
as Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels. He ended his career making a brief
appearance as a face, only to disappear and die tragically. Since then
only the Undertaker, with his Lord of Darkness persona and Mankind, and
Kane have been the only monsters to make any waves with the WWF/WWE. But
notice one thing about them; the WWE turned them both into faces. They
turned Kane and Mankind into comedic personas, while the Undertaker
turned into something a bit more mortal. The true monster is gone from
with world of wrestling.
The WWE is wondering what is wrong and why people aren't tuning in.
While there are a number of reasons for this, one is the fact that there
aren't any true monsters anymore. No Abdullah the Butchers. No Bruiser
Brodys. No King Kong Bundys. No Andres. No Big John Studds. No Wild
Samoans. No Road Warriors (the old version, not the one the WWF had
talking to a puppet). Just wrestlers. They don't build anyone up, for
fear of having the crowd start to route for them. Any momentum the heels
get is either taken away quickly by humiliating losses, or turning them
into faces. The faces are promoted more than the heels, and rightly so.
But unless the faces have some mammoth man to overcome, how tremendous
is their effort. Would Superman's effort have been so amazing had he not
died trying to defeat Doomsday. Look at the odds James Bond always has
to overcome. Would Bruce Willis looked so good in Die Hard if Alan
Rickman hadn't been so evil. The WWE has made their wrestlers more
human, which is good. But when the opportunity presents itself and the
world of wrestling could have one true monster roaming around the ring,
the WWE should take advantage of it. Everyone loves a monster, and
everyone loves to watch a monster to see what they're going to do next.
The WWE has dropped the ball lately, and for that I think they are
starting to regret it.
So until the Baseball Hall of Fame realizes its mistake and elects Goose
Gossage, John Kruk, Tommy John, and Roger McDowell...keep
reading....
Pay-per-view out of the way for the new year, and
the next one coming up quickly, it is a normal question to ask whether
or not the WWE has really righted the ship that seemed to be more than
listing. It appeared to be downright sinking.
When everyone starts looking at the biggest event
the world of professional wrestling has to offer. Wrestlemania, which
has been dubbed a showcase of the immortals. This year, however, it will
read more like a laundry list of whose left standing rather than have
the feel of a true Wrestlemania.
This is a two part Novak Notebook all wrapped up into one pretty little
package. After all, it is Wrestlemania we're talking about, and it
wouldn't do anyone justice to mention it briefly.
The first part of this equation is talking about the now; hence this
year's Wrestlemania. Like I said, they started talking about it as the
showcase of the immortals a few years ago, and this year they're going
to fulfill that prophecy by dragging out some relics like Undertaker,
Hogan, and others. It looks like we're going to get another Austin-Rock
match. That was the case a few years ago when they wrestled two
Wrestlemanias running. HHH will face Booker T, and Lesnar will have to
come up with someone quick.
Now in a way this is going to be a very exciting and entertaining
Wrestlemania, but already it has the makings for being disappointing as
well. There will be no Kurt Angle in this year's Wrestlemania, which is
very disappointing. Although this time the WWE isn't to blame, but
injuries are forcing the Olympic Hero out of action for nearly a year.
He was finally going to get his shot and headlining or being co-main
event at a Wrestlemania and he can't do it. That hurts, because Angle is
one of the best things going for the WWE right now.
Another thing that happened was that Edge got hurt. Just as it looks
like the WWE is getting people back like Rhyno, Lita is getting close as
is Nash, they lose Edge and Angle. That really hurts and it also
disrupts major attempts to push these guys. I would seriously look into
why these guys are all getting this neck injury as well. Is it all freak
accidents, or is there something the WWE can do to help prevent this?
But losing Edge and Angle close to Wrestlemania is going to hurt the
show.
But don't let that stop you because this has the makings of one of the
more interesting, if not out and out best Wrestlemanias we've had in a
long time. Rock/Austin with the new Rock should be entertaining. The
possible returns of Nash and Lita. Who knows what the Divas will do to
respond to the Torrie Wilson pictorial in Playboy. Lesnar at
Wrestlemania and Hogan/McMahon should be fun. I'm hoping for a
Lesnar/Benoit match at Wrestlemania myself. Booker T v. HHH will be
good, but I really liked the way Evolution was coming together. Again,
injuries are playing a part in that they lost both Randy Orton(again!)
and Batista for awhile. It looked as if things were clicking and the rug
gets pulled out from under them by losing two top guys. Who will replace
them? Three-Minute Warning?? Don't think so. I think these injuries are
hurting the WWE at the wrong time and hopefully they'll be able to come
back from them with some surprises and still throw an entertaining
Wrestlemania Event.
Now on to another point. Why do even the casual fans watch
Wrestlemania? Does anyone know? I think I may have the answer to that.
People like being remembered of things from their past. Think about how
many times you've either heard or said; it wasn't like that when I was
growing up. Or 'I liked it so much better the way it was when I was a
kid.' Sports, comic books, movies, actors and actresses. We tend to
remember the ones from childhood a lot more fondly than the ones that
are around now. Most people have a favorite movie from when they were a
kid that they still think is great. People growing up with Star trek
can't understand how people can even think to watch anything Star Wars.
But Star Wars was the first real movie I remember seeing in theatres. I
still love the first one because it was awesome as a kid. Everyone
thinks the comic books they grew up with are better than the ones being
pumped out now. Typically their favorite player from a sport is someone
they watched as a kid. Mine is Tom Seaver in baseball and either Jack
Lambert, Jack Ham, or Joe Montana in football. No questions asked. None
of today's players in either sport can compare to those guys in my mind
because I grew up idolizing them.
Guess what friends and fellow travelers. Wrestling is the same way. My
favorite wrestler is "Rowdy" Roddy Piper. Sure I like Chris Benoit, RVD,
Rhyno, DDP, Raven and guys like that. But they can't compare to guys
like Piper, Savage, Undertaker when he first arrived in the WWF, Jake
Roberts. I grew up watching these guys and they were awesome. So, what
do people do when they want to revisit their past? They watch things
that remind them of that past.
That is why ESPN classic is taking off. That is why every year around
the Super Bowl, ESPN rolls out every Super Bowl up until the current one
and shows clips from them all. I still get tingles when I watch the old
Steeler Super Bowls, even though I watched them all when they were first
played. It brings back wonderful and fond memories. That is why Nick at
Nite is successful and why we even have reruns to begin with. I mean how
many people are first time watchers of the shows on Nick at Nite,
getting exposed to those shows for the first time, as opposed to people
who always loved the shows and want to watch them again and again. My
favorite show of all-time? MASH. It hasn't played on television since
1983 in first run episodes, but nothing has come close to it in my mind.
A few years ago, Wrestlemania had a ten hour program which documented
all the previous Wrestlemanias. I'm sure they're thinking of doing the
same thing for Wrestlemania XX. If I were Vince, I would try and get
back anyone who is still left alive for Wrestlemania XX and have them
make an appearance. Just a thank you to the fans, and a reminder of what
these wrestlers did for the company and what they mean to the fans. I
know that is a lot of wrestlers, but who wouldn't want to see each man
and woman come down to the squared circle to their old entrance music
and say thank you. No gimmick battle royal, no matches, just a thank you
at the beginning. I think everyone who is a fan would want to see that.
Imagine Piper, Savage, Roberts, Valentine, Hart, and everyone else
involved with the early Wrestlemanias meeting all the new people
involved now. I think it would be tremendous. Kind of like what the
Academy Awards did a few years ago by trying to get all the living Oscar
Winners together as a tribute. Yet, another flashback for people. And
the wrestlers they can get, show a picture of them in action. I think
again, it would be a tremendous event.
People like reflecting and thinking about things gone by. It happens
all the time. That's why we react strongly when we see someone we knew
way back when. We don't react that way when we haven't seen someone in a
year or so, but if they are from our childhood, we react strongly.
Wrestlemania is the only event that goes back far enough to touch people
when they were kids. It has the tradition of being the first big event
in wrestling, coupled with the glitz and glamor that awed us when we saw
it for the first time. The WWE can never lose site of that fact, which
is why it has to work harder on Wrestlemania than any other event they
put on during the course of the year. They can pick up viewers if people
like what they see during Wrestlemania, or they will lose people until
they want to watch Wrestlemania again down the road. It's kind of like
the New Year for the WWE and it kicks off with Wrestlemania. Here's
hoping it is a good one.....
So, until Playboy comes to me with an offer to be a guest photographer,
Well, Wrestlemania has come and gone, and I
swear I haven't seen more commercials in a pay-per view. Overall, it was
a pretty fun and entertaining ppv. Of course the guys I hang out with
are always entertaining no matter how bad the ppavs get. This was the
best Wrestlemania in a few years, but for a few matches I was starting
to worry.
It is kind of funny how the WWE is trying to return to its past. They
don't have any ideas left, and McMahon is scrambling to shock people. I
wrote awhile ago that he is going to run out of things to surprise
people with, and he's going to look at other venues to supply the
entertainment. I guess he didn't read that column and he's still trying
to surprise people. While I'm the first to admit that I was totally
surprised by the returns of Sable and Rowdy Roddy Piper and look forward
to seeing them perform for the company that made them both very famous,
one has to wonder how long it will be before they are pushed into the
background. Scott Steiner main evented two ppvs, and he wasn't even on
Wrestlemania. The NWO disappeared almost as soon as McMahon signed them
up, even before Hall's problems resurfaced. Nash is even getting to the
point of going back to the Diesel gimmick because he knows McMahon
created it. It seems to me that anyone who left the company and came
back is having problems lately. Don't believe me....ask Stone Cold.
Now I'm not sure whether having all of this turmoil is a good idea or a
bad idea. Maybe its McMahon's way of showing people that he can forgive
and forget, but he will screw you over if you do come back to the
company. Having Stone Cold lose to the Rock at Wrestlemania was clearly
McMahon's way of showing Stone Cold that you don't cross the boss. What
he has in store for Piper and Sable is anyone's guess.
Then along came Goldberg. Building up to his debut in the WWE might be
a bad idea. By the time all of these promos run into Backlash, people
may be tired of waiting for him. They did the same thing with Big Poppa
Pump, and people waited for so long they got tired of waiting. Goldberg
could've been brought in like Jericho and been bounced off of several
different people before he actually wrestled to see who he stuck to. Go
by fan reaction when he comes out with different people, and see who
they enjoy seeing him interact with. Go with it for awhile, until you
work him in other places.
HHH winning at Wrestlemania is fine, but it does beg the question of
who he is going to drop the belt to eventually. Who is left on RAW that
can actually compete with him? I'm betting he wouldn't drop it to
Goldberg, and the Rock isn't going to be around long enough for him to
hold it. Is he willing to lose it to Austin? I don't know, so it will be
interesting to see how and who they come up with next. One thing though;
did you notice how HHH got back at the Rock for not wrestling and losing
to Booker T? He wrestled the Hurricane, whom the Rock lost to, and beat
him cleanly. Just goes to show what sleeping with the bosses daughter
will do for your career.
Why did the Undertaker have to wrestle pratically by himself? Is Nathan
Jones that bad? If so, why was the match set up like that to begin with?
By the way, I like the fact they are bringing back the managers, but
why is it the one man who actually has a stable of people (Paul Heyman)
isn't on television any more? Doesn't make sense to me.
It looks like the NWA:TNA is trying to build slowly toward a tv
contract. I think they are doing things the right way, but the time for
small steps is over, and they need to start making bigger and bolder
leaps if they are ever to give the WWE a serious run for their money. If
nothing else, they need to at least find their own nitch, and the first
step was evident when a few of their wrestlers appeared in the movie
"Head of State". starring Chris Rock. Roaddog, Jeff Jarrett, and one of
the Haas brothers appeared in a scene where they beat down Rock. It was
quick, but for viewers it was something other than the WWE. The problem
is that unless they get the ppvs all the time on Wednesday nights,
people might also think that it was a fake wrestling organization. They
need to work on promoting themselves a little wider than what they've
been doing. Time for taking the babysteps is over.
That's all for now, so until Bog Poppa Pump flexes his muscles so much,
he explodes all over the arena...keep reading, sincerely the Novak
Notebook.
It takes more than a parent
To raise a child, it takes a village. That
was a quote from Hillary Clinton during her days in the White House, and
although I have serious questions about that statement, it is going to
be used to lead into my topic I have planned on talking about since
seeing the Rowdy One back on television.
Although many feel that it does indeed take a village (I'm assuming
you're not including the idiot of course) to raise a child, there are
two sides to the story. No one would argue however that it takes more
than catch phrases to build a wrestling superstar.
The WWE for many years has been promoting their wrestlers by the catch
phrases they use. "Austin 3:16", "Shut Your Mouth", "I am that Damn
Good", "Have a Nice Day", and "Rest in Peace" were all put on T-Shirts.
Shame on anyone who can't match the phrase with the wrestler. It is a
nice and tidy business. You have a wrestler who is built like a
brickhouse, slap him with a catch phrase and let the fans who like the
guy buy the shirt. It all seems to work out quite nicely.
If this were true, then you wouldn't have had Rowdy Roddy Piper come
back recently for his Piper's Pit. The kilt would be mothballed and
Piper would be enjoying his retirement in Oregon. It wouldn't be that he
wouldn't want to come back, but the WWE wouldn't have any use for him to
comeback. They would be so successful that they wouldn't need him, and
at the salary he is commanding, he wouldn't be worth the price. Of
course I'm not just speaking of Piper. There are talks Mick Foley,
Sting, Lex Luger may make returns to wrestling. The WWE has already
brought back Goldberg, Sable, Hulk Hogan, Kevin Nash, Scott Hall (until
his problems came back to haunt him again), and Shawn Michaels. They
were in contact with Bret Hart about making a return, and that Mean Gene
guy works on Confidential. Jimmy Hart is being seen backstage with
Hogan, and Ric Flair is still hanging on in the business. All of these
people would be gone if it were some other organization, but the WWE has
brought them all back, hoping to rekindle some type of magic that has
been missing for some time. All of that begs the question; what is wrong
with what they have?
Personally I am still entertained by the WWE. They still have solid
matches, and there is a lot more wrestling and a lot less soap opera
than there was back in the day when they were competing with the WCW. I
think they have some of the top talent, and their main event matches are
starting to get better. Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit and Booker T have all
risen to main event levels and they can all put on very good matches.
HHH is weak. When he is wrestling someone good, he puts on a good match.
When he is wrestling someone weak, his matches are weak. That is not the
sign of a good champion. Benoit, Angle, Van Damm, and guys like that can
make anyone look good. They can all put on good shows no matter who is
wrestling them. So, there are where some of the problems lie is with the
top gun on the RAW brand.
But why did HHH need Flair? Isn't he over enough? Hasn't he been around
long enough? It made sense when Brock Lesnar was first starting to pair
him with Paul Heyman so as he could get over easier with the fans, but
HHH has been there and done that. Why does he need someone now? Maybe
its because he can still learn a thing or two from the master himself.
In other sports, much like the WWE people long for their heroes. The
guys like Joe Namath, Johnny Unitas, or Joe Montana in football. Their
favorite teams like the Purple People Eaters, the Orange Crush, or the
Steel Curtain. In baseball you have Mantle, Mays and Aaron. In hockey
you have Lemieux, Gretzky, or Orr. In basketball you have Jordan, Bird
or Magic. People think back, and think back fondly to those times when
those players ruled their respective sports.
Wrestling is no different. People think back to Piper, Hogan, Flair,
Rhodes and Funk. They look at the young guys and wish how their heroes
could wrestle the new guys, because the new guys couldn't hold a candle
to the guys they grew-up watching.
That is where the difference ends though. People wish they could see
Montana go up against the Steel Curtain. Or see Sandy Koufax pitch to
Sammy Sosa. They wish they could see Espisito stop shots from Gretzky.
They never will though. That is what keeps the fantasy alive. They never
will see those match-ups, and quite frankly most of those people
wouldn't want to see those players come back at all.
Would any of you want to see Joe Namath come back? Even Joe Montana? I
know Montana still looks decent for his age, but right now do you think
he would last and perform at the levels he did when he retired? Lemieux
and Jordan came back and had pretty good years respectively, but both
had one thing in common. Injuries. Neither performed at the levels they
did when they retired, and although I disagree with this next statement,
many feel they both tarnished their reputations when they came back.
Look at Steve Carlton his last few years. He got hammered by every
hitter around and people wondered aloud why he didn't quit three years
sooner. People are already talking about why on earth both Jordan and
Lemiex didn't quit after last year. If Marino would've quit one year
before his disastrous final year, would his accomplishments been any
less so? People want their heroes to hang on, yet they whine when they
can't perform they way they did when they were a lot younger and there
was a lot less wear and tear on their bodies.
What is all of this getting at? Do I have a point to all of these
ramblings? Why yes I do. The WWE is losing the ratings war big time.
They are searching for answers. There are a few, some I've mentioned
before, others I haven't. What they are doing is trying to set up
battles between the heroes of yesterday with the stars of today. There
are two problems with this. One is the stars from yesterday are by far
more charismatic than the stars of today, and the other is you aren't
getting the stars of yesterday. You are getting former stars who are
still trying to hang on.
Who in their right mind wouldn't want to see Stone Cold Steve Austin
against Rowdy Roddy Piper? The first popular rule breaker against the
most popular rule breaker of all-time. Well, if Austin's neck gets
better and he gets clearance to wrestle, then that match could happen.
The major problem with that is you aren't getting the Piper from twenty
years ago, but the Piper from today who isn't nearly as fresh or as
Rowdy as he once was. That's like Hank Aaron coming out of retirement to
face Randy Johnson. The other problem is that Piper can still do a hell
of an interview, and verbally run rings around everyone, including Stone
Cold Steve Austin. So, he makes Austin look silly outside the ring,
while the match would look silly inside the ring.
Guys like Hogan, Piper, and Flair grew up in this business where they
had to stand out from the crowd. They are the survivors of the
generation that first broke into mainstream acceptance. They are
flamboyant, colorful, and larger than life. Flair and Piper can cut
promos better than anyone walking the face of the Earth. Of today's
superstars I would have to say only the Rock could stand toe-to-toe with
them, and possibly Kurt Angle on a good day. Everyone else gets blown
away.
Hulk Hogan was just huge. He was wrestling and that fact will never
change. That is what drove the match between he and McMahon. People
cheering Hogan, knowing he help revolutionize the industry. How does any
other wrestler compete with that. All of them road in on his coat tails,
and none of them have taken it to any higher levels. Wrestling has
branched out more and isn't as silly as it was back in the 1980s, but if
someone really sat down and thought about it, wrestling back then was
everywhere. Now it is more accepted, but it has a cult following much
like hockey does. It has made its niche and grown comfortable in there,
but it isn't likely to grow beyond those borders.
There in lies the problem. If you still have guys like Piper, Hogan and
Flair around, how do you stack up? You have each one go around and lose
to all of the other wrestlers much like Flair and Hogan have done for
the past year plus? This way the new guys can say they have victories
over Flair and Hogan. It puts something on their resume that states they
beat legends in the industry. It would be like picking off a Montana
pass, or striking out Hank Aaron, only it is equivalent to doing it
today. When they are well past their prime.
Today's wrestlers are kind of caught in the middle. They aren't what
the old wrestlers used to be. They aren't as colorful, they aren't as
flamboyant, and they aren't larger than life. They try, but they don't
stack up. Hulk Hogan's popularity back in the 1980s trounces all of
today's wrestlers, and Roddy Piper's skills with the microphone put
everyone else's to shame. The wrestlers now don't connect as well with
the fans. A few like Austin and Rock have, but not too many get to the
point that the fans actually care about whether they win or lose.
With bringing back the older wrestlers, I think the WWE is not only
trying to boost ratings, but perhaps they are also trying to have the
younger wrestlers take note of how it is done and maybe they can learn
from it. Honestly, when Edge went down with an injury it was seen as a
major blow for the company, but I have many friends who follow the WWE
religiously, and they can sit there and tell me they really don't notice
he's not on television. That is a bad sign. Most of the wrestlers are at
that point however. You notice when Austin isn't there, or the Rock is
off doing another movie. But how many noticed when Rhyno was gone, or
Benoit, or Edge? It was great to see them come back and we route for
them, but did we ever really miss them. I noticed when Piper wasn't on
in the old days. Many noticed when Hogan left. Did anyone notice that
when Hogan left, WCW ratings started going up? Was that just an
interesting trend or is there more there than meets the eye?
The legends are still around, which makes it hard to escape the past.
You can have it on your resume that you pinned Hogan in the middle of
the ring, but he is so much larger than life it doesn't matter. That is
like Sam McDowell saying he struck out Hank Aaron once in his career
toward the end of it when he was playing with the Brewers. That might be
fine and dandy, but the man still has 755 home runs in his career and
where are you? The wrestlers of today need to worry about themselves and
not the legends they have pinned. Pinning Ric Flair now doesn't mean
anything, and the fans know this. Pinning Hulk Hogan now doesn't mean
anything, because the fans know that any of today's wrestlers wouldn't
have even sniffed a victory in Hogan's glory years. Forget it. Look who
he had to lose to to drop the belt. Andre the Giant and it was filled
with controversy. You think McMahon would've let a guy like HHH (Paul
Orndorff type), Austin (Piper mold), or Rock (think Macho Man) get close
to beating Hogan? I don't think so.
The wrestlers today have to build their own legend. It is a bit tougher
to do in wrestling than in other sports. McGwire did it by beating the
home run record. Barry Bonds did it by closing in on Willie Mays 660
home runs. Randy Johnson is going crazy in his old age. Roger Clemens in
chasing 300 wins. Emmitt Smith broke Walter Payton's rushing record.
Mario Lemieux is trying to get to 700 goals. Michael Jordan is trying to
play like Mike. In wrestling you don't have those benchmarks that you
can strive for. How many people have held the Intercontinental....ooops,
they don't have that belt anymore. Who has the most Heavyweight Title
reigns. Now I'm confused...is that the heavyweight title or the WWE
Title? But you get my point when I say the wrestlers don't have a final
goal to strive for like they do in other sports. They must just keep
going and build for the next ppv.
So, that is where the comparison to other sports must stop and the
comparison the entertainment must begin. So, you look at top actors and
actresses. In movies, the comparisons from new movies stars to older
ones isn't as prevalent as it is in sports. I think that, much like
wrestling, it is difficult to compare a Jimmy Stewart to a Tom Hanks.
The comparisons can be made, but it is difficult. How do you compare a
Michael Myers with a Groucho Marx, while still trying to compare him to
a Charlie Chaplin? You can't. The lines and connections are as easy to
make. The years and generations and styles of movies are so different,
you can't make honest comparisons. In sports you always have numbers.
Movies you don't.
So, how come you still have movie stars and top box offices draws? Adam
Sandler isn't really compared to any old time movie stars, yet he is one
of today's biggest box office comedy draws. Why? His films appeal to a
wide audience. Harrison Ford has been compared to different box office
stars of the past, but none seriously. Why is he in some of the biggest
movies of all-time? Also, why aren't both of these men always big box
office stars? They both have a list of flops to their names, yet they
can still go out and make a movies everyone will want to see. If
Harrison Ford goes and makes a pretty decent fourth Indiana Jones movie,
who won't want to see that? Also, look who recently topped the box
office again. Yep, Adam Sandler.
Wrestlers have to do the same thing. Think about some of the most
successful storylines ever in wrestling. The NWO....well, who hasn't
thought about being an Outsider and bucking the system. Austin v.
McMahon was along the same lines, but instead of a whole group of people
versus an organization, it was one man standing up against his boss. All
of us have dreamed of that during our lifetimes. Hogan was just such an
optimist and the Ultimate American, people bought into it. Piper was the
ultimate rebel, and people loved to hate it. Blood and Guts, the Dark
Side, Impossible Matches, ECW. On a lower level than the WWE, but it was
still very successful, because it fed into people's desire to see people
pushed to their limits. Look at some of the shows on television now like
that.....aka Fear Factor anyone.
Wrestlers have to learn from their old time heroes. They have to become
larger than life. While it's nice that HHH thinks you have to be able to
carry on a 20 minute dialog with the fans to be a champ, he couldn't be
any more wrong. While it seems like you do need something of a catch
phrase, all you really have to do is make an impact. If you ramble for
20 minutes, yet the fans either fall asleep or turn the channel to
something else while you're talking, you haven't exactly grasped their
attention. If you talk for five minutes, fire the fans up and then go
out and kick someone's ass, then the fans will remember you a lot more.
Outside of "I am the game, and I'm that damn good," does anyone remember
anything HHH says? But think of Flair stripping down to his boxers, or
the hundreds of lines Piper used to say, and those are what the fans
remember.
The WWE is entertaining. I think they are trying and they seem to be
trying to go in the right direction. Unfortunately, some injuries along
with backstage politics have hampered their efforts. I like to see the
old guys as much as anyone, but they should keep Flair as a manager,
keep Piper on the Pit, and keep Hogan home. Have them work with the
younger talent and tell them their opinions on what they need to do to
connect with the fans. As long as they're around, it will be tough for
the newer wrestlers to get the attention they need in order for the
business to grow. I think it has potential to rebound from this, but the
WWE has to look at it and realize they have a cult following and they
are never going to draw the numbers such as Monday Night Football or
Friends do. They have a niche, and if they keep it in that perspective
they can be very successful. If they try to reach beyond where they are
capable of, they will get their noses bitten right off however.
So, while it's nice to see the older guys back, think about this
question. What does it benefit to have HBK defeat Y2J, Hogan to win or
lose against the Rock, or Piper to take out Rikishi? Anyway, until Piper
comes knocking on my door with a coconut in hand....keep
reading...
Alike should enjoy this version of
the Novak Notebook as we explore some of my favorite movies of all-time.
Not all are wrestling based, mind you. After all, I do watch things
other than wrestling. But, even though they aren't all wrestling based
movies, I will be sure and tie them into wrestling, however obscure I
have to go to make the connection. So, sit back and enjoy the Siskel and
Ebert version of the notebook.
BLEEDING LIKE RIC FLAIR OR DUSTY RHODES DURING A MATCH AWARD GOES TO :
Dead-Alive. Anyone not familiar with this movie should rent it if you
have a strong stomach. Don't rent the wimpy R-rated version, but try and
find someplace that doesn't have Blockbuster tattooed on the outside and
rent the unrated version. This movie has buckets of blood, and it is one
of the first movies directed by Peter Jackson. He did several others,
most notably the Frightners with Michael J. Fox and Bad Taste, before
moving on to that pesky Lord of the Rings trilogy. Dead-Alive is a
romantic comedy with zombies. It starts off with a weird looking monkey
from another country squirting his juice all over the overbearing mother
of this poor shlub, and ends with his house full of zombies, and his
mother zombie leading the charge. It was the first time I ever saw a
lawnmower used as a weapon (something they never even attempted in ECW)
and someone's intestines chasing the poor guy and his want-to-be
girlfriend through the house. You'll laugh, you'll cry, and if you don't
have a strong stomach, you may throw up.
MOST ECW STYLE BRUTALITY IN A MOVIE AWARD GOES TO ; Saving Private
Ryan. The first forty minutes or so of this movie are the most brutal
you will ever see. Steven Spielberg was going for realism, and according
to some vets who needed therapy after seeing it, he came pretty damn
close. It was awful, brutal, and one wonders why anyone would want to go
to war after seeing something like that. It is kind of like ECW in that
everyone knows it's a movie (ie: wrestling is fake) so they try and make
it as real as possible. In wrestling though, it is becoming more and
more real, which causes more and more injuries.
BEST ENTRANCE INTO AN ARENA AWARD GOES TO; Wesley Snipes in the first
Blade movie. Entrances in wrestling are very important. They can either
enliven a crowd or kill it. In the first Blade movie, this entrance had
it all. Blood was pouring out of the ceiling, rock music was blaring
everywhere, people were going crazy, and there was a sad sap trying to
get out with his skin in tact. Suddenly, he crawls into the feet of
Blade, who isn't covered in any blood. He's dressed in black, looking
cool, and ready for action. He whips his sword out, and that entrance
carried the adrenaline through the rest of the pretty average movie.
BEST MOVIE STARRING A WRESTLER AWARD GOES TO; Roddy Piper. No, this
isn't for They Live. It surely isn't for anything he has done lately
which goes from sad to forgettable. And no, it wasn't even close with
the Rock's Scorpion King. The award goes for a nice little science
fiction movie Piper did a few years ago called Sci-Fighters. He was a
solid actor in the movie, and he didn't really play himself (or at least
the himself we've gotten to know over the years). He didn't do a lot of
wrestling in it, and he actually had to act his way through the movie.
Yes, it is an action movie, but it is also a detective movie. While the
Rock will be discussed later his movie relied on special effects,
action, and looking at Kelly Hu's nearly naked body. The Rock didn't
really act as much as he acted out. It was an action movie and filled
the role of action star. Roddy Piper however, had to show emotion, and
carry off the roll of a detective who could actually be in charge of a
case and put the pieces of the puzzle together. He had to prove to the
audience he wasn't a lug. The Rock didn't have to overcome that, which
is why Roddy Piper and the movie Sci-Fighters get the nod.
WORST MOVIE STARRING A WRESTLER AWARD GOES TO; Rob Van Damm and the
movie Black Mask 2. Now there are a lot of movies that could have fallen
into this category. Let's face it, there are a lot more movies that
could have gone into this category instead of the one up above. You can
name almost any Hulk Hogan movie and put it here, a number of Roddy
Piper's movies, Goldberg's attempt with Universal Soldier: the Return,
or Ready to Rumble. The reason I chose this one was because I saw it
recently, and it just was so bad. Most of Hogan's movies are supposed to
be a bit on the silly side, and Ready to Rumble had a few funny moments.
But Black Mask 2 was a sequel to a really good Jet Li movie, so it had a
built it audience. It was a serious movie and an action movie, which
should've played right into the hands of RVD. He doesn't really star in
the movie, and has a supporting role, but still it was pretty bad from
start to finish. The action was weak and overall the movie was just a
major disappointment. I actually did something I don't normally do, and
I exchanged the DVD at a store and got something else. It didn't follow
in the footsteps of its predecessors and strayed a little to close to
the water, hence drowning any more potential sequels.
ITS BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL AWARD GOES TO; Blade II, Toy Story 2, and
Star Trek II. This falls under the Justin Credible coming back being
better than the masked guy he was the first time around. Or Razor Ramon
being better than the Diamond Stud. Or Diesel being better than Oz. The
talent and cast were there the first time, and sometimes it wasn't bad
(much like the first Toy Story) but usually something is missing. All of
the movies and wrestlers above learned from the first attempts and got
better the second time around. Instead of going Return of Swamp Thing,
they beefed up the action and comedy quotient and delivered a much
better movie the first time around. Instead of having Johnny Polo
hanging around outside, you get the Raven effect. Instead of Blade just
showing up in the first movie, you get him kicking a lot of ass the
second time around (and even using a suplex to get it done....see, I
told you I would reach).
FIVE BEST SHARK BOY AWARDS GO TO; Shallow Grave. Re-Animator. The Blair
Witch Project. Six-String Samurai. Cube. Now this award goes for the
best Independent movies made. They are outside the main stream and not
put out by big time movie companies like Warner Brothers, Paramount, or
Universal. Much like the Shark Boys of the world, these movies toiled in
the underground and managed to be creative enough and inventive enough
to each find their nitch in the world. Now, I know I could have put My
Big Fat Greek Wedding in here because it was an independent movie and it
is the highest grossing independent movie of all-time, but when you have
Tom Hanks backing you and helping get along in the world, I don't know
how independent you really are. The five I mentioned were all creative
(Greek Wedding is basically Sweet home Alabama or any number of romantic
comedies on a smaller scale), and even launched a few careers. Ewan
McGregor (who is in the new Star Wars movies) was in Shallow Grave.
Re-Animator got the world interested in HP Lovecraft once again, and the
Blair Witch Project showed that independent filmmaking wasn't dead.
Cudos to all independent filmmakers at keeping their dreams alive. Much
like their compatriots in the wrestling industry, they are keeping their
dreams alive any way they can even if it means they are under the radar
screen.
BEST TLC FOR PURE ACTION AWARD GOES TO; Hard-Boiled. I have seen a lot
of movies in my life. I am the biggest action fan out there, and nothing
compares to the work Chow Yun Fat and John Woo did over in China. You
watch any of their movies, and they seemed to have redefined the action
movie. John Woo got close to being able to duplicate that with his movie
Face/Off, and Chow Yun Fat tried with the Replacement Killers. The movie
Hard-Boiled puts all of their efforts in America to shame. It has a
plot, it has feelings and emotions, but it has the most action you will
ever see in a movie. I tried to get a body-count in the movie and lost
count. Much like the TLC matches in the WWE that had action going
everywhere, there is an action scene popping up all the time. They have
at least 6 major fight scenes in this movie, with explosions and guns
being fired everywhere. it was amazing to watch, because it is
choreographed to well. It has amazing style, and also like the TLC
match, instead of turning away at the shear brutality of the match, you
can't help but be enthralled by what it going on.
BEST BRINGING IN NICK PATRICK AND MAKING HIM THE NEXT DANNY DAVIS IDEA
FOR A MOVIE GOES TO; I usually hate remakes. I tend to see them anyway,
just to see how they ruined the idea, but occasionally they will
surprise me and come out with a good one. I liked the way the WCW had
Nick Patrick go from senior official to NWO official, making him the
Danny Davis of the 1990s. It was clever and it hadn't been done in
awhile. Of course the WWE got a hold of Patrick and tried to do the same
thing, causing laughter to erupt everywhere. The WWE has to realize that
sometimes lightening doesn't get caught in a bottle twice. But much like
wrestling, Hollywood tries to recapture that lightening and fails more
times than it succeeds. The Ring came out last year and was a major
exception to that rule. The original is a Japanese movie (which I had
seen long before the Ring came out) called Ringu. When I saw they were
remaking it for English, I thought of several movies Hollywood has done
that to and shuddered. Leave well enough alone I say. But the Ring
turned out to be every bit as good as the original, and it was wonderful
to see the director keep a lot of the feel and tension from the original
in the new version. I highly recommend it, unless of course you scare
easily. Honorable mention in the category goes to the Magnificent Seven
which was loosely based on the Seven Samurai and Fistful of Dollars
which was directly based on Yojimbo.
NOW ON TO THE BRING NICK PATRICK OVER TO WWE AND HAVE HIM DO SAME THING
AS HE DID IN WCW AWARD GOES TO; Psycho. No, not the original, but the
remake. I told you this was a remake category. I was completely offended
when this movie came out, and even more so when Gus Van Sant said the
reason he was doing it was because people didn't watch movies in black
and white anymore. I'm sorry, but I don't think the American public is
that stupid. A good movie is a good movie, no matter whether it is in
English or another language, or whether it is in black and white or
color. You can't top Hitchcock, which is one of the reasons he was
called the Master. Probably a very good reason he was nicknamed that, so
who cares whether the movie is in color or black and white. Even if that
were the case and people weren't going to watch a black and white movie,
you still have Psycho II-IV that are in color and have the one and only
Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) running around his mother's house. It was
a bad idea to remake the film, and a really bad idea to make it shot for
shot identical to the original. That's right give the fans nothing new.
Kind of like bringing back the NWO and trying to recapture, oh wait they
did try that didn't they?
NOW FOR SOME WRESTLER CASTING CALLS; Since I devoted most of this to
everything but wrestling (even though I got my little mentions in here
and there), we're going to have some fun and cast different wrestlers in
famous movie roles. See if you agree or not, and who you would add to
the casting list.
Roddy Piper- would play Jack Torrence from the Shining. He's one man
who can look normal one second and completely possessed the next. He
could've played that role perfectly.
Before I go, I would like to answer the question of whether or not the
Rock has a chance to make it in Hollywood. The answer to that is of
course he does. This is a town, afterall, that made stars out of Steven
Segal, Chuck Norris, and Jean Claude Van Damm. So it appears you don't
need a whole lot of talent to get to the top. The Rock has more talent
than any of those guys, so he should go even further. His problem will
be much like everyone else in Hollywood. Don't make bad movies. It is
kill Kevin Costner's career slowly but surely, and it would kill the
Rock. Scorpion King was a nice safe move, but he can't do too many of
those. Eventually, he'll be expected to do more. I'm not sure how much
longer he'll be able to rely on his wrestling fans to come out and
support his movies, so he's just going to have to make really good ones.
His problem will be that his margin for error is going to be a lot less
than for anyone else. Pauly Shore got to make five or six movies before
people gave up on him. The Rock will be able to go from hit to hit and
that's it. The minute he makes a misstep, he will be labeled a failure,
and just another Brian Bosworth who didn't make it in the movie
industry. It is unfair, because I think he has tremendous talent, but
there are already people waiting for him to fail. Fans want to see him
fail, because then he'll go back to wrestling full-time. Critics want to
see him fail because then they'll get to say I told you so. He has to
make smart decisions about the movies he's going to be in. Sometimes
it's better to take a small part in a really good movies than the lead
role in a mediocre or bad one. He needs to step lively and carefully,
otherwise you'll be smelling what the Rock is cooking a lot more next
year when he can't get parts to do voice overs in cartoons. But then,
I'm not telling you anything you didn't already know.
So, until the next time when Jamie King sits on my chest and asks me
what I'm looking at....keep reading....sincerely the Novak Notebook.
Is on the verge of a nervous
breakdown if you ask me. Wrestlemania drew lower than expected numbers
for the buyrate, and Backlash appeared about as interesting as the
seventh round of the NFL draft, only with far less coverage. Vince is
trying everything to entice the viewers to come back, but nobody is
buying what he has to sell.
This isn't going to be another column dedicated to what Vince McMahon
has to do. I will say that he is trying, but maybe it is time for him to
step aside and let his children run the company for real. After all, how
much worse could they do? Besides, both Shane and Stephanie are a lot
younger than Vince, and they may tap into that critical demographic of
teens and early twenty year-olds that seem to be slipping through
Vince's fingers. But outside of that, this isn't what the Notebook is
going to be about.
I am here before you saying I applaud what the WWE is going to try and
do. Unlike the Iraqi foreign minister who tells everyone everything is
fine and Iraq is going to win the war any day now, the WWE seems to be
admitting they have a problem. Much to everyone's surprise, they are not
only admitting they have a problem, but they are also looking for ways
to rectify the situation.
People are getting hurt. It is a plain and simple truth that this is a
dangerous profession, and going through a career in the WWE without a
major injury proves one of two things. You either ended up getting fired
really quick, or you hurt yourself doing something other than wrestling.
There are not too many wresters who go through a successful career
without some kind of injury. Even though wrestling is considered "fake"
that does not mean the profession doesn't take it's toll on the human
body. The fact that these men and women push themselves using steroids
or other supplements is another story, but right now we'll focus on
injuries.
Like any physical activity, wrestling requires the person to put
themselves through quite a bit that their body wouldn't normally go
through. This adds strain to the body, and eventually the body will
break down. There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it. The body will
break down. You don't belive me? Take a look at most of the older
wrestlers or even older football players. They say that Johnny Unitas'
hands were so bad, he could hardly hold a pen, much less throw a
football.
But right now in wrestling it is very different. These aren't the
normal injuries one has come to expect from the sport. How many
wrestlers can you name that have had their neck operated on? Kurt Angle
(although some of that was from before he started his career), Chris
Benoit, Edge, Steve Austin, Rhyno, Lita (even though it was related to
her stunt on Dark Angel), and I'm sure there are more. These aren't the
tears and strains from years ago that would sideline a wrestler for
several weeks. These are near death injuries that are being caused by
the envelope being pushed too far. Why else would Brock Lesnar try a
shooting star press (even though he is quite capable of doing one) if
the fans didn't want to see it?
For several years now, the WWE has tried to push the envelope. Thanks
to ECW, which didn't have big names so they relied on tough matches,
people are expecting to see matches that make their jaws drop. They want
to see someone jump from the second story balcony. They want to see Hell
in a Cell, and someone thrown off the top. They want to see someone like
Sabu get his arm ripped open by barbed wire in the middle of the match,
and instead of quitting, he merely tapes up his arm until the match is
over. The fans not only want to see tables, and ladders, and chairs, but
expect to see them. If RVD doesn't do something crazy, the fans walk
away disappointed.
So, the question is are fans ready for a change? With ratings dropping
and buyrates falling as well, Vince McMahon is doing something he isn't
used to doing. He's pulling back. Instead of going full throttle into
the rest of the year, the rumor is that the WWE is going to take it easy
on the crazy type matches and finishes. Maybe they saw Brock Lesnar land
and flinched like everyone else did. He nearly ended not only his
career, but could've possibly ended his life. That may have been what
woke the WWE up, and forced McMahon to tell his wrestlers to play it a
little closer to the vest.
Vince has lost a lot of talent over the past few years. Sure, it is
great to build up a big return for a guy like Benoit, or what he'll
probably do for Edge and Angle after they've been off with a major
injury. But the fact that you lose these guys for nine months to over a
year causes a major disruption in any plans you might have for them. The
continuity is lost. Look at Evilution. You had HHH, Flair, Batista, and
Orton. Orton just keeps getting hurt, and probably will continue to get
hurt over freaky things. But with him and Batista out, any momentum they
had was gone. You lose Angle, you gain back Nash. You lose Edge, you
gain back Rhyno. But you have to start all over again with each guy. It
makes it difficult to keep storylines going when the people in them
disappear.
Why are soap opera successful? Okay, I'm not really sure either, but
there are a few things about them I do know. They are a lot like
wrestling in that they build feuds between characters, and the
characters are around for years and years so fans can always tune in and
watch people they are familiar with. My mother used to watch Young and
the Restless, and most of those characters from six, seven years ago are
still around and kicking. Also like wrestling, it never ends. The plots
keep going and going, and while they may resolve one plot line, the
overall storyline just keeps going. If I was a real person and had all
of that happen to me from a soap opera, I probably would've just killed
myself. Much like a wrestler though, they go through more than any
normal human would, yet fans watch to see if they can overcome the
obstacles they are facing.
Why isn't it working in wrestling? Fans tune in and see two things. The
first is the feuds are set-up and then they disappear, but that is for
another column. The second is who do they follow? Edge is out for nearly
a year, and Angle is out for two months or more. Complete disruption.
HHH blew out his quad and was out for nine months, Nash blew out his and
had the same deal. Undertaker is there for awhile, then gone for awhile.
It makes it hard for the fans to tune in and watch their favorite
wrestlers year after year, especially if they're not around.
I think the WWE is starting to realize this. They are bringing back
older stars, hoping to draw in the older crowds. I don't know how this
will play with the younger audience, when they see some old guy their
parents used to talk about wrestling one of the new breed of wrestlers.
But, be that as it may, Vince is trying to scale back the possibilty of
getting hurt. He wants his people to be around, so the fans can get
attached to them and watch them over the years, instead of nine months
here or six months there.
The WWE seems to be asking for not nearly as much on the high flying
moves, I guess except for the small guys. My guess is we will never see
Brock try the shooting star press again, unless he does it on his own.
Not only that, but German suplexes sound like they are going to be
limited, so as to limit the strain on the neck. What is funny is that
the Undertaker started to do the Tombstone piledriver, and Nash started
to do the Jackknife powerbomb, which were both banned at one time. The
piledriver was banned because of Owen Hart landing Austin on his head,
and Nash's piledriver was banned because he had hurt someone as well.
They had a work where the powerbomb was banned as well, but now both
moves are allowed again.
The piledriver is pretty safe, if it is done correctly. I don't think
we'll see the sitdown piledriver, which is the kind that Owen Hart and
Paul Orndorff used. That is a much riskier move. However, the way the
Undertaker does it, there has to be some major screwup to have the guy
land on his head. Usually the knees land first, and the guy's head never
even gets close to the mat (unless you read Piper's book, where he
scooted down and allowed the Undertaker to smash his head into the
ground...but you have to read to book to find out why). The Jackknife
isn't too bad, unless the throw is off.
With all of the injuries, and thus the WWE trying to do something to
curtail them, the question is; are fans ready for that? They have been
so accustomed to seeing move after move after move, are they ready for
maybe one German suplex and that's it? Are they ready to see more
techincal matches, rather than screaming "Holy Sh**" at every incredible
move. The wrestlers give their hearts every night to the fans, but it is
starting to catch up to them. I am sincerely hoping the fans realize
this when they don't see the amount of amazing moves they are used to
seeing. I do not want to hear boring chants through what is probably a
good, solid match, yet it doesn't have the high flying stuff the fans
really want to see. You had great matches for years, without the crazy
stuff. That's why guys like Hogan, Flair, and Piper can roll out there
every once in awhile. They didn't jump off bridges, or get hit with a
thousand chair shots for the fans, yet managed to entertain the fans as
much as anyone else. The wrestlers today need to start to realize that
they have a future ahead, unless they keep going with all of the
outrageous stuff.
Don't get me wrong. I'm as amazed and enthralled as anyone else when I
watch some of these matches. One of my favorites is Sandman v. Sabu in
the first stairway to hell match. It was amazing what those two put each
other through. Even though I love that stuff, I would not blame any
wrestler one bit if he stopped and said "Wait a minute, I have a wife
and kids I want to be around for, so I think I'll entertain a little
differently." All that I ask is when a wrestler goes out, he gives a
hundred percent (you can't give 110%, not possible). I'm paying money to
be entertained, and if you can't do your job to the fullest, then do
something else. However, I do not expect for them to put life and limb
on the line for my benefit. It isn't worth it. If they give me a good
performance, and there isn't a lot of flying around, that's fine. I'll
walk away satisified. Another great match was Bret Hart v. Shawn
Michaels in the iron man match. There wasn't a lot of high flying stuff,
mostly because Bret was a techinical wrestler. But both wrestlers put on
an amazing performance, and I dare anyone to come out and say they
didn't get their money's worth out of that one.
Wrestlers are entertainers, and we are essentially paying them to
entertain us. That is true, and unfortunately it does come with a price
sometimes. They get hurt, tear muscles, or whatever. But just because we
buy a ticket or a ppv does not mean the wrestler has to run through a
wall before we are satisfied. I would feel horrible if a wrestler got
crippled, and he came up to me afterwards and said he did it because
that was the only way he felt he could entertain me. People getting
seriously hurt isn't entertainment, and if you think it is, go rent the
Faces of Death movies.
The WWE looks like it is starting to realize the wrestlers health comes
first, and for that they deserve credit. As fans we should show the same
support, and unless the wrestlers aren't even moving in the ring, never
chant "boring". I know I want to be healthy and live to be a ripe old
age, and I'm sure the wrestlers would like that also. They deserve that
opportunity.
That basically blew up
in the face of the WWE, one has to wonder what direction they are
heading? They had several strong programs leading into the ppv, and the
RAW right after the ppv was very weak. All of that on top of a weak ppv,
plus the build-up for the next ppv BADD BLOOD is circling around RAW,
since it is only a RAW induced ppv. So, is this the right direction for
the WWE to head?
I think in the long run it might be, as long as they stay the course.
Their initial problem is going to be to try and convince viewers to
cough up $35 or whatever a month to watch events that should be taking
place on either RAW or Smackdown.
However, one of my major complains all along has been that the WWE has
too many ppvs. Believe it or not this actually cuts down on the number
of ppvs. How, you ask? Well, I'll tell you how. They are going to have
four ppvs a year that have both rosters. That is good because it will
bring back the specialness, as it were, of those four major ppvs.
Summerslam, Survivor Series, the Royal Rumble, and of course
Wrestlemania. If this pans out, then you will have eight ppvs left,
which equals out to four per show.
This will mean they will have time to develop some of the more
important feuds, while trying to bring up some of the lower level talent
to be worthy to compete on ppvs. Remember, they will always have a top
card. The top two or so matches will always be there whether they
wrestled every ppv, or once a year. What all of this needs for this plan
to work is the lower level talent to bring their game up enough so that
people will want to watch the entire ppv.
When you have both shows, you usually have two main events from each
show, meaning four "quality" or "Draw" matches. These are the matches
they've been seriously building and the audience wants to see. With the
new format, you will only have two main event type matches for a ppv,
meaning they will have to work hard at developing the undercard,
otherwise the ppv might not be watched. Are you, as a consumer, going to
plunk down $35 to watch probably four decent matches, and most likely
two surprise matches from the undercard? Probably. Now, are you going to
do the same for two decent matches, and maybe one surprise from the
undercard, but the rest of the event should have been given away on
television? Probably not.
This is the task that the WWE is facing. When they start showing
matches like Test/Scott Steiner v. La Resistance on ppv, people are
going to tune out. There was some build-up, but outside of the short
dress Stacy Kiebler is wearing, nobody really cared about this match.
Yet, it somehow managed to make it on a ppv. If they continue like that,
this format will fail.
If, however, they put that same match on after say a two month
build-up, where it has gotten brutal, and violent, and downright nasty
between the two teams, then people might be willing to put up with a
match like that on a ppv. You don't believe me? Look at some of the good
tag-teams from the eighties. They weren't all that good. Outside of the
Hart Foundation, the British Bulldogs, and a few others, we were stuck
with the Killer B's, Strike Force, the Can-Am Connection, Akeem and the
Big Bossman, yet they all made it on ppvs. You need to build-up the
smaller feuds, and the way to do that is to get them nasty. Say what you
will about the ridiculousness of the Big Show and Bossman feud, but
guess what? People still remember Big Show jumping on his daddy's
casket. That made an impact.
With the smaller feuds, they are going to need a game plan. First set
up the feud so people will know it's coming. Next, they must escalate
the feud to the point where the heel interferes with the faces match,
costing him the match. Then they meet, but there is some type of no
decision, or if there is a decision, the heel just beats the living
daylights out of the face. After that, the feud takes off where they are
in each other's face all the time, until the ppv. Throw in a little
danger, a little blood, some nastiness and tastelessness, and you have
the makings for a decent little feud.
Look at defining moments in wrestling, and they are usually surrounded
by violence. Just as in soap operas when a character does something
completely nasty or evil, the world of professional wrestling looks for
those moments. When did Shawn Michaels have his moment? When he put
Marty Jannetty through the glass on the Barber Shop with one swift kick.
When did Piper become an icon in the WWF? He made himself famous when he
bashed Snuka's head in with a coconut. When did Snuka become famous?
When he jumped from the top of a steel cage onto Don Murraco. How about
Macho Man? When he took out Ricky Steamboat's throat. Ric Flair? He had
a bunch of brutal matches in the 70s, which made him and a few others.
Mankind? How about Hell in the Cell? For the most part, there is a
defining moment when the wrestler either does something crazy, amazing,
or simply violent. Those are the memories that stick in the head of fans
everywhere. The twelve chair shots the Rock gave Mankind. The blood
pouring from Austin's face when he wouldn't give up to Bret Hart. The
Piper/Valentine Dog collar match. The Funk/Sabu barbed wire match. Sabu
v. Sandman in the Stairway to Hell. TLC matches. Bam Bam Bigelow v. Taz
going through the ramp leading to the ring. New Jack jumping from
everywhere in the arena. These are the events people remember, and they
can make a career. In lower feuds, these are going to be essential to
carry the feud over to the ppv, and make an audience want to see what is
going to happen next.
These feuds aren't going to sell the ppv, but what they will do is make
the casual fan more apt to buy the ppv, if the whole card looks
appealing. Like I said above, people are not going to buy a ppv for two
matches, but if the top matches look really good and the undercard looks
solid, they may say "What the hell" and skip the hockey game, basketball
game, baseball game, concert, eating out and buy the ppv. These are the
fans the WWE needs to keep going. The ardent fans are going to keep
coming back no matter what. If the WWE builds these minor feuds right,
instead of devoting an hour plus to the main event, then the fans might
react as well. Not everyone likes Goldberg, HHH, Lesnar, and Angle. Some
like the Guerreros, Benoit, Jericho, Booker T, and others. If they can
build up their feuds, the fans will watch. If they make it interesting,
the fans will watch. If they keep Stone Cold as funny as ever, the fans
will watch. We'll see what direction the WWE goes with this, because
this is a risky venture, make no mistake about it. They may have the
perfect gameplan, or they may have to do some major rehauling by the
time Survivor Series rolls around. I'm hoping this split works, because
I think you would get a lot more out it, and it would work much better
in the long run....so until Mr. America is revealed as the one and only
Mr. Clean
The Notebook isn't going to talk about any one
particular subject. We're going to throw around a few things and see
what sticks and what doesn't.
First and foremost, however, is Piper's Pit. I love the fact they
brought Piper's Pit back, and I even like hooking Piper up with Sean
O'Haire. I think teaming a young guy who might have a hard time getting
over with a veteran like Piper is a very good move, and brings instant
recognition to the person for the crowd.
However, since when has it become McMahon's Pit? And why is it Piper
became McMahon's lackey. In his old days, Piper never took orders from
anyone. He was hated by everyone, heels and faces. He stood up to
McMahon for real, so why is it now he has started to kiss his ass.
Piper's Pit was the place where feuds started, people got noticed and
things happened. Since it has been back, a majority of them have circled
around Hulk Hogan, Zack Gowen, and Vince McMahon. Why? Why can't they
simply have McMahon march to the middle of the ring and call Hogan out
with Zack? Why use the Pit?
The Pit could've been used to bring Kurt Angle back this past week. It
could be used to bring in Lita, or Edge if those happen. It could be
used next week to introduce the new cruiserweight champ, Rey Mysterio,
and then someone else comes out and starts something with him. It could
be used to advance Sean O'Haire against a few people other than Rikishi.
It could be used to heighten the feud between Big Show and Brock Lesnar.
Instead, it has been used time and again for Hogan and Tenacious Z,
along with Vince McMahon of course.
On the flip side, Jericho's show has become what Piper's Pit should be.
They usually don't have the same guests two weeks in a row, and the show
not only advances Jericho's own feuds (as the old Pit did)as well as
start stuff for other people. What was the fastest way to turn the Rock
back to face? Have him on the hilight reel, and have Jericho, Christian
and others turn on him. They could've done the same thing with Angle on
Piper's Pit, and it would've worked just as well. Jericho has always had
talent with the microphone, and it is good to see them finally give him
a forum in which to use the talent.
Anyone who doesn't think Mick Foley is going to be the special guest
referee for the Hell in the Cell Match, well you should just go back to
word search puzzles, and leave wrestling alone.
What happened to the major pushes for Booker T, Chris Benoit, and
A-Train? A-Train I can kind of understand, since he was never a top card
person, but still, he was a monster who could be someone to be reckoned
with. But Booker T and Chris Benoit have been pushed to the back burner.
I like the fact they are trying to bring back the importance to the
Intercontinental Title by having Booker T going after it, but look who's
on the other end. Christian has never been anything more than a
mid-carder. It makes the feud too lopsided, and therefore it isn't very
interesting. I mean there are only a few weeks until the ppv, and they
have barely interacted. They've had run-ins and stuff like that, but not
much else. Once Booker T gets the belt, I hope the title is brought back
up to some level of respect, and used the way is had been before. As a
stepping stone to bigger things.
As for Benoit, I can understand using him to elevate John Cena, but
what the hell? Benoit hasn't had a title shot in so long, and the Big
Slow has had a handful. Are you seriously telling me the Big Dope is
more worthy of title shots than Benoit? I don't think so. Benoit has
more than paid his dues, and he should have a title run. If it doesn't
work fine, but that doesn't stop them from putting the strap around
HHH's waist. He should at least be given the chance to hold the belt,
and I can guarantee one thing. His title matches would fit the
description of main event matches.
What happened to the Road Warriors? They show up once, get their butts
handed to them and then disappear? That made about as much sense as
everything else the WWE has been doing lately. If they can bring back
Big Poppa Pump and still have the crowd go crazy for him, they could've
drawn out the Road Warriors return and done something with it.
I love the interaction between Stone Cold and Eric Bishoff. I think
they are funny, and the WWE definitely needs to have some funny bits
brough back to their tv. That being said, why does it have to be part of
their ppv programs. I warned that when they do the split that the WWE
better not put too much stuff on the ppv that could very easily appear
on television. Now this two out of three redneck triatholon stuff smells
eeriely like something that could appear on RAW or Nitro.
Just had to give Stephanie some help huh? Had to have Sable be her
little helper, since Austin and Bishoff is working so well on RAW, they
needed the same thing over on Smackdown. The one problem was they kind
of already had it. Vince McMahon is everywhere over on Smackdown. Didn't
you like it much better when Vince wasn't on every segment?
Why is it that when Vince thinks things aren't going well, he is the
answer? More Vince and less of everyone else is the answer in his eyes.
Now I loved the lie-detector segment and thought that was one of the
best spots they have done in a long time, but to have him dominate the
way he is right now is just silly. Have him do his one or two segments
per show and get him the hell out of there. Too much of one person, be
it HHH, Vince, Hogan, Rock, Austin, Bishoff, Piper, or whoever is a bad
thing. That's why Brock hasn't worn out his welcome with the fans. His
interviews are short and sweet, not twenty minutes long. HHH never got
that. He felt to be champion, you had to ramble on for a twenty minute
diatribe that the fans wanted to be tuned into. Well, they don't. During
those times, we usually switched over to Nitro to see what was going on,
or now we switch over to something else. It got long, it got boring, and
we tuned it out. It wasn't entertainment, because there was nothing
other than one guy out there talking to us about how great he is.
Goldberg, Brock, and guys like Undertaker didn't really do that. They
just went out, gave a quick speech, got interrupted, and kicked ass.
That is what the fans want to see. They watch wrestling for action, not
dialogue. If they wanted dialogue, they would watch Young and the
Restless.
I guess Evilution is back. How long before Randy Orton hurts himself
again? Ever notice that these young really built guys have a way of
hurting themselves rather easily. Batista hurt himself while rehabbing.
Orton wasn't back a month before getting hurt again. HHH tore his quad,
and so on down the line. Then you have a guy like Ric Flair who can
still wrestle at his age, and he never seems to be hurt. Hmmmmm? Maybe
there's something to be said for an overdeveloped body huh? These guys
train and weightlift, and go through all kinds of endurance, yet none of
them can hang with the Nature Boy on a day in and day out basis. Kind of
interesting when you look at guys like Rikishi, Nature Boy, Chris
Jericho, Christian, and all of those cruiserweights. They seem to be
able to go night after night (the cruiserweights do suffer injuries due
to the high risk of their spots), and they never seem to get the "freak"
injuries the heavyweights do. Don't know if there are ties to all of
that, just kind of interesting if you ask me.
So which Diva is the next one to pose for Playboy now that Trish
Stratus has taken her name out of the running? Here's hoping it is
Stacey Kiebler, although seeing Trish in the buff certainly would've
been an uplifting experience.
Who is the WWE going to bring in next to try and surprise everyone?
Bringing back Piper was certainly a surprise, especially considering the
way he talked about McMahon and the WWE, but who is next? Is McMahon
really proving the age old saying, money can buy you everything?
Goldberg said he would never work for the WWE because of their content,
and look. Piper said he couldn't stand McMahon and wanted a union, and
look. Mick Foley had serious issues with McMahon, and it looks like he's
coming back. Sting said he couldn't work for them because of his
Christian values, but it looks like he's close to signing. Bret Hart
said he never wants to work for McMahon again, but is he next on the
list. All of these men supposedly had integrity, and their word meant
something, but it could appear as if each of them has sold out. While I
don't know if that is the case or not, I do know McMahon almost takes a
great pleasure out of signing someone who says he will never work for
the WWE no matter what. It almost becomes a quest for him. Once he signs
the person, he can nearly rub it in everyone's face as to say, look I've
obtained the unobtainable. All I know is that it looks like a lot of
people who never wanted to work for McMahon now are under contract to
the WWE.
Well, that about wraps up another edition of the Notebook. I hope you
enjoyed it almost as much as I enjoyed giving it to you. If not, stop
reading you fool. So, until New Jack and Mick Foley have a match to see
who can fall the farthest into a Dixie Cup, keep reading
It looks like Vincent K. McMahon may be reading the
Novak Notebook. If it is good enough for him, then it surely can be good
enough for you to read.
The WWE has decided to bring back not one but both titles that the
Notebook has spoken about before. The Intercontinental and US
Heavyweight Title. This is a great move by the WWE, because it gives the
undercard wrestlers something to shoot for. Having Christian being the
first Intercontinental Title holder is questionable. I honestly thought
they would turn the title over to Booker T, and then let him have a
great run with it. I don't know who should be the first US Title holder,
but both of these belts needed to be brought back, and kudos to the WWE
for bringing them both back.
The belts serve a duel purpose. First it gives the fans another belt to
keep an eye on. Second you can always take a chance with a wrestler. If
you're not sure whether or not a specific wrestler can carry the banner
of RAW or Smackdown, you can give him a title run with the undercard
title. This is what these titles were used to before. They were
springboards for lesser wrestlers to make the next step. The Bret Harts,
Shawn Michaels, Jeff Jarretts, Ravens, and many others have held these
belts. Some have made the leap to the Heavyweight title, others did not.
But almost all of the successful Heavyweight Champs from the WWE held
the Intercontinental title first. The only ones I can think of off the
top of my head that didn't were Mankind, Hulk Hogan and the Undertaker.
Austin, Rock, Angle, Jericho, HHH, Hart, Diesel, and even the Ultimate
Warrior held the Intercontinental Titles to at least see if the fans
would respond to these wrestlers with a belt. It is a great stepping
stone, and it is a welcome sight to see these two titles come back to
the wrestling world.
Is it me or is Stephanie McMahon getting better at playing a face. She
doesn't do nearly the whining she used to, and she actually is getting
over with the fans. I think they realized all they had to do is have her
show up and make decisions the fans liked. She is a beautiful girl, and
she has a great body (although the breast implants were ridiculous), but
they didn't know how to get her over. Finally, they brought in her dad,
and everyone realized what a jerk he is, so they felt bad for Stephanie.
I liked teaming Zack Gowen with Mr. America, but why are they dragging
it out? Are they waiting for the ppv to unleash Tenacious Z, or don't
they quite know what to do with him yet? They are dragging out his
debut, and thus I think one of two things will happen. Either they will
have the fans clamoring at a fever pitch, or they will push their fans
to the edge of boredom. If that happens and he debuts, people will lose
interest very quickly.
Now on to Goldberg. I like the fact they didn't push him into the title
hunt right away. They tried that with Scott Steiner, and look where it
got him. Although come to think of it, I think I would be happier to
have Stacy's "services" rather than the Heavyweight title. But bringing
in Scott and dumping him into the title hunt quick did nothing for the
title hunt or the fans' interest. Having Goldberg go through a bunch of
people makes him wait his turn, and it heightens fans' interest. Not
only that if Goldberg loses interest and runs away, they don't lose
anything. It's a good idea, and it is also a good way to protect
themselves from getting burned.
I think the WWE is starting to take some strides to go somewhere with
their programming. Having Mae Young come out for the pie eating contest,
while predictable, was hilarious as hell. The WWE seems to realize they
need to install some humor back into the programming. The Bishoff/Austin
feud is great and brings some humor back into the program. Now if only
they can keep the feud on television and off ppv.
My only beef with the WWE right now is with HHH as champ right now. He
has been champ for nearly the whole year right now (if not the whole
year so far)and he really hasn't come close to losing the title. People
are going to get bored with him as champ. Remember, this isn't years ago
when people loved seeing a champ last for four years or so. These people
are used to television and their entertainment in thirty minute chunks,
so someone holding the belt for six months is an eternity. He has had
some good matches, and I guess he feels there is nobody worthy of
passing the belt to, but remember something. Everyone who could
challenge him for the title is over on smackdown. Not only that, he's
beaten most of them too. HHH has become his own worst enemy with beating
everyone. Who can the WWE bring in and have them beat HHH that he hasn't
already faced and defeated. He has taken them all on, and he has beaten
nearly everyone. They can't bring in anyone else. Nash and Booker T
could've made decent runs, and then give the belt back to HHH in a month
or two. But instead, he has beaten these two cleanly, so there's nothing
left for him to prove. He has painted himself in a political and
professional corner. By beating everyone, he is showing that he is going
to use all of his stroke to keep his belt, so in turn, nobody is going
to want to be the "PPV Patsy" for very much longer. Who is going to be
next is most likely Goldberg, and if he defeats Goldberg, there is
nobody left. RAW will be HHH. And look what that has gotten them so far.
Of activity to talk about lately in the world of
professional wrestling. I mean other than Piper getting fired, Hogan
quitting, and Goldberg going crazy. Did I mention Mick Foley coming
back? Outside of that though, there isn't much going on.
Now that Torrie Wilson has done the Playboy thing, and the WWE has three
women who have appeared in Playboy, the question has obviously come up
as to who will be next. My answer to that is nobody that is on the
roster right now. Like any normal red-blooded American male, I would
give nearly anything to see Trish Stratus, Stacey Kiebler, or Lita
appear in Playboy, but I don't think they will. Trish has already come
out and said that isn't her thing and she's not going to do it. Nothing
has been said on the fronts of Stacey, Lita or Stephanie McMahon, so it
doesn't look like anyone is ready to jump into those waters. I think the
reason for that is because it would look as if they were riding in on
Torrie's coattails rather than creating their own little niche. If you
look at the other two, Sable and Chyna, there is a pattern. Sable was
the first, but no other females appeared in Playboy while she was
around. Sunny was there, as were a few others, but none stepped forth
and posed. It wasn't until Sable left the company that Chyna appeared
nude in Playboy, and it wasn't until both were gone that Torrie
appeared. You could've had a whole bunch of other women show up in the
magazine, yet each time, the next woman seemed to come after the last
one was gone.
My friend tuned into NWA on Wednesday, and he said it is a lot of fun.
He said they put on a pretty good show, until they start trying to copy
the WWE, then it doesn't come off so well. This is good news,
considering my friend is a serious WWE mark. However, they still need to
take the next step and put some shows on regular television to get more
exposure to the masses. I know they're trying to get some television
contracts, but even if they have to do the same route as ECW and buy
time on local television, I think that is something they should explore.
Now that Vince McMahon owns every piece of footage worth something in
the realm of professional wrestling, I am still perplexed as to why he
hasn't put out some more serious greatest hits videos. Really, could you
imagine the film he has on guys like Piper, Flair, Hogan, RVD, and
others from their days in WCW, NWA, or ECW? It is a real shame the stuff
is just sitting there without getting put together in some compilation
form. I would love to see a two or three disc greatest hits of Rowdy
Roddy Piper, with his days from NWA and the infamous dog-collar match,
through his days in WWF, and then his returns to WCW and WWE
respectively. It would be a great collection, and they could do the same
for the guys who have had long and storied careers.
The high marks in wrestling lately have been;
Booker T as the Intercontinental Champion. He is going to be a great
champ, and this is the only way to build him back up as a serious
contender for HHH's belt. The biggest mistake they could make, however,
is to get him involved with a feud with HHH too soon. Let him hold the
IC belt for awhile, take on all-comers, and beat them cleanly. Then
after awhile, have him involved with HHH in a massive feud.
Test as a major heel has been entertaining and fun. Although seeing Mae
Young getting slammed the way she did (I swear she takes some great
bumps, especially for a woman her age) did make you shiver a bit, it is
great to see them try and build up a nasty heel. Most of the heels are
wishy washy, outside of HHH's chosen ones, and since Test wasn't doing
anything, having him turn on Stacey and smash through everything is a
great idea.
Jericho's Hilight reel is fun. Sad to say but it was far more
entertaining than the return of Piper's Pit. It was what Piper's Pit
should have been. Jericho was always good with a microphone and this
gives him a perfect forum in front of the fans.
Smackdown right now has a lot of things going for it. I have one major
complaint, that I'll get to in the next segment, but overall it is a
much more solid program and much more interesting program. It doesn't
revolve around one person, because Brock Lesnar can't hold down the fort
using his verbal skills. That allows others to get involved with the
program, and the turn of Stephanie against her father was wonderful, and
should be worth watching for at least a little while. I love the fact
they give the cruiserweights time on Smackdown, and they allow them to
still do what they do best.
Now for some things that make me stop and scratch my head;
There have been some disappearances lately. If you see these people,
please contact the WWE and let them know where they are. Dawn Marie,
Goldust, Rhyno, Kevin Nash, Goldberg, Lita, Paul Heyman. All of these
people have disappeared or had their air time severely shorten recently,
and I was just wondering if the WWE could devote a program to them
called where are they now.
I know Goldberg is pissed, and to some extent he probably has every
right to be. I'm sure the WWE promised him some things, and he probably
expected to be riding high by now, instead of popping up here and there
on the program and doing his thing for all of five minutes. But
seriously, what did he expect? He shows up on RAW with HHH, and expects
a fair shake? Now according to rumors going around, Goldberg deserves
everything he is getting, and by the looks of it, he still doesn't seem
to mind if he kicks someone's head off accidently, but when he was
scheduled to be on RAW was I the only one who thought the idea of HHH
dropping his belt to Goldberg was far-fetched. These two guys can't
stand each other, and it goes way back. Now I know some differences can
be put aside, but I just don't see HHH falling down for this guy after
everything that has been said. And on that note...
HHH just has to stop screwing around with the bosses daughter. Hogan
seems to have indicated that he left because of HHH, and I'm sure other
things have happened because of him. Besides, who is left to challenge
him? He has beaten cleanly; Nash, Booker T, RVD, Steiner, Hogan, and
anyone else who could stand in his way. RAW is filled with people he has
beaten, and the only ones he hasn't beaten are Brock Lesnar and
Goldberg. I seriously doubt Goldberg will end that streak, and it looks
like they're keeping everything separate, so he won't get a shot at
Brock. HHH thinks that by having him champ, everything is stable and the
PPVs will get sold because the champ is someone everyone recognizes.
Well, the truth is, everyone does know who he is, and they are very,
very tired of him. I mean Nash has a feud with him, and now he's going
to start one with Test? No knock on Test, but what does that say about
how the mighty have fallen. Nash was afraid of this, and while I'm no
big fan of Nash, I would've loved to see him have the belt for a few
months, just so HHH didn't have it. For eight months or so, HHH has been
champ, outside of the one small hiccup to Michaels who held it for a
month. He has had a stranglehold on RAW, and I think people are starting
to get real bored with him. He doesn't have the charisma or the talent
to pull off a long reign as champ.
There are only two problems with Smackdown as far as I can see. One is
too much Vince. Whenever Vince feels there is a problem, he thinks he is
the answer. He isn't The Vince v. Zack showdown should be very
interesting, but I think it would be in everyone's best interest if he
stays behind the scenes a little more after that. Stick to a couple of
vignettes behind the curtain during the show, and then go home.
The other problem is they don't have enough heels. It seems like
everyone wants to be a face lately. While I understand that you get more
of the money to be a face, you need someone to fight. To have face v.
face all the time can't happen, so you have to have some monsters to
come up against. So, who does the WWE drag out? The Big Show. Time and
again they have tried to make him into a monster, but just last week or
so he got beat by a one legged man. Now I realize Zack had some help,
but still. The Big Show is the top heel, and that is the top problem for
the WWE right now. They have no one else over on that side who can step
in and present a serious challenge to anyone. There is talk about Benoit
turning heel again, and if that meant he would get a heavyweight title
run, then I'm all for it. If it is just an excuse to have someone for
Brock to fight, leave him a face. There is nothing worse than turning a
guy, building him up for this big feud, having him lose, and then he
disappears into midcard hell once again. Just give him a serious run
with the US title for awhile, and see where that goes.
Lastly, ever wonder what happens when your meal ticket is gone? I guess
that is what Shawn O'Haire must feel like right now, since the WWE fired
Rowdy Roddy Piper. Although from all indications, I understand the
firing was justified, it must make O'Haire wonder what they're going to
do with him, since so much of who he was, was in fact built around who
Piper had been. That is why you should always try and be an individual,
rather than ride coattails, because if they ever get pulled out from
underneath you, you're headed for a big fall.
Hope you enjoyed this segment of the Novak Notebook. If not, go read a
book or something. Anyway, until the Red Sox not only make it back to
the World Series, but manage to lose it once again,
Another few weeks
Has come and gone, and a really good pay-per-view has
passed us. Also, Summerslam is around the corner and is shaping up to be
an interesting ppv as well. Let us look at wrestling and see what is
going on over in the world of wrestling.
The main topic of this notebook will be Chris Jericho. Why you ask?
Because I think he is one of the most underrated wrestlers around right
now, and he is nearly carrying RAW on his back. His antics are always
great, and after a rough start in the WWE, he has bounced back and his
matches are usually the best ones on the program.
HHH is the mainstay on RAW right now, and it looks like he's going to
be as long as he doesn't screw up and get caught with another girl.
Until that day comes, or his steroid enhanced body completely falls
apart, he is going to be on RAW for a long time coming. However, the
days are long gone where he carried the program, let alone the company.
I think Vince McMahon has come to realize that it may be a mistake to
have the company in the hands of one wrestler, ala the old days with the
likes of Hogan, Rock, or Austin. He may have a focal point, but the
wrestler isn't carrying the entire company for the very reason that they
seem to be so much more prone to injury anymore that to bank on one star
is taking a very big risk. HHH and Evolution has been the big thing on RAW, but considering every
time you turn around, one of them is hurt, they can't very well keep
them the centerpiece of the show. The only one who doesn't get hurt is
Ric Flair....go figure that one.
So what has happened on RAW? Chris Jericho has emerged as the star. He
is the hilight of the night for sure. He has great matches on RAW for
awhile now, culminating in eventually getting the win over Shawn
Michaels. He has overcome the WWE putting him in jack boots to make him
look taller, and he has put on solid match after solid match. Next up is
Kevin Nash and a hair-hair match. If he pulls that off and Kevin gets
his head shaved, I would venture to say that it is a safe bet that he
will hold the belt again very soon.
Jericho has a way of getting heat from the crowd, even managing to do
that from his own country when he so desires. Yet, he also has the
ability to become a very popular face as well. He reminds of the Rock
and Austin in that he could turn into a face, yet still manage to be the
same type of person.
Jericho has a wonderful combination of talent and charisma, which is
one of the reasons why I think HHH has squashed him every time they've
faced each other. I believe HHH was afraid of Jericho's fast rising
star, so he sought fit to have match after match against him, and squash
him at every turn. It was ridiculous, and HHH tried so hard to send him
down the ladder, but thanks to Jericho's charisma, it is difficult to
keep him down.
It was such a shame that it has taken so long for Jericho to come up
the ladder. He was like a lot of the former WCW stars that came over to
the WWE. He came onto the scene with a bang. But look around at the rest
of the former WCW stars, and right now he has the highest status in the
company. Big Show has had his ups and downs, to say the least. I think
the only reason he's stuck around is because McMahon always loved big
bad men. He just hasn't figured out what to do with him, and now it's
too late to make him a monster.
Goldberg hasn't done much yet. Guerrero is pretty solid as a midcarder.
Benoit has always been a star, but he seems to come and go into the big
picture in the WWE, much like he did in the WCW. The big stars in the
WWE are the ones who have been in the WWE for quite some time. HHH,
Austin, Rock, Brock Lesnar, Angle, Kane, and Undertaker. The bright new
stars are home-grown WWE stars as well. Booker T, Eddie Guerrero,
Benoit, Van Damm, and many others have a place in the WWE, and some are
more important than others. But none of them are as consistently around
the big picture the way Jericho has been for the better part of two
years.
It didn't look like it was going to be that way for Jericho either. He
came onto the scene with a bang, yet he kept losing in big matches for
quite some time after a quick run when he first got into the WWE. There
was a big comment going around my friends when we would watch ppv after
ppv, where Jericho was losing to the likes of Test, wondering who
Jericho had ticked off to fall so low.
But Jericho has rebounded, and maybe this Hilight Reel might be the
thing to keep him at the top. Hopefully it will do for him what Piper's
Pit did for the Rowdy One. He certainly has the potential to keep it
going for a long period of time, but his main problem is that he has
lost time and again to the champ. The only way for Jericho to actually
rise to the top of RAW is for him to get a win over HHH. He needs a
clean win for the title, and then I think his resume will be complete.
Until that happens however, he's going to have to settle for second
best.
I actually like this Scott Steiner v. Test feud. It gives these two a
push, involves the lovely Stacy Kiebler, and also gives them something
to do as well. I also like Eddie Guerrero right now, although I feel
that Benoit has sunk once again. I like Rhyno, but Benoit should be in a
hunt for a title, not a personal feud with the big man beast.
I also like Tazz and Michael Cole as announcers over Jim Ross and the
King. I have a real problem with the Coach as anything other than a
joke. He isn't even close to Jim Ross, and he isn't as nice to look at
as Terri for interviews. I like the turn of Brock Lesnar, but whatever
happened to Paul Heyman? Is he even with the company anymore.
What's with the Bash'em Brothers. I like the team, but get rid of the
name and the S&M angle. Like John Cena and the feud with the Undertaker.
Another great feud. The French Team has got to go. They have no
personality, no talent, and they are just plain terrible. What happened
to the tag team ranks in RAW. They were hot and heavy for a long time,
and now nobody cares. Why is that? Well, look who the title holders are.
I like the women's title competition, and finally the WWE acknowledging
that Molly Holly is actually a pretty decent wrestler. She deserved a
return to the title, and the WWE finally gave it to her. Good job.
Overall, I think the WWE is heading in the right direction. Having Kane
come in as a complete maniac is great, although having Shane as the only
one to challenge him takes away from his monster tag. I'm glad to see
they scrapped the Shane/Kane match for Summerslam, because that would've
totally squashed any momentum that he would've had. Just let him wreak
havoc for awhile. It makes it interesting, and he doesn't even have to
be in the title hunt. That is what the WWE needs more than anything else
right now. Compelling stories outside of the title hunt. They had the
Austin/Bishoff feud. They had the title hunt, but for a long time they
didn't have much else. Now, they have a monster, which is great. Let's
see if they can keep it up.
Why on Earth HHH can "wrestle" in an Elimination Chamber match, for one
minute, and yet win the match? He rips Hulk Hogan of the late 80's for
his backroom politics, yet he is far worse than Hogan ever was. They
need to have him go away and do it soon.
Why the WWE didn't do the same thing with the Big Show that they've been
doing with Brock Lesnar recently? I really like what they're doing with
Brock right now, but if they had been doing that with Show all these
years, then maybe he would be further along and could be taken a bit
more seriously. Instead, they stick him with a stupid name, stupid
entrance music, and at one point tried to turn him into a comedian.
Where those weapons of mass destruction are? I hear they are sending OJ
Simpson over to look for them, since he did such a great job at looking
for Nicole's real killer. I understand that most killers hide on major
golf courses all around the country.
Why Stephanie keeps getting bigger and bigger breasts? I honestly liked
her when she had a normal sized chest, but now she looks ridiculous,
especially when she is trying to run to the ring.
Why Brock Lesnar is called the next big thing? I think he's going to do
something along the lines of Goldberg did in WCW. They gave him a belt
and a run way too early, and he hasn't really worked on anything. If
they play this run right with Angle, Lesnar will just go through the
ranks and hone his craft for some time. Don't even let him sniff a title
shot for awhile. Keep him as the monster, but let him wrestle guys like
Spanky and Zack.
Why the Undertaker never loses? I have several different ideas on this
one. First off, people still love him and he has this thing about not
jobbing to everyone. It isn't uncommon, Piper and Hogan had it in the
80s, and Hart had it in the 90s. HHH has it now. He has the political
influence in the back to make it happen, but I guess it shows something
when he is willing to lie down for someone, and it makes it all the more
important for that person's career. I mean how many people had wins over
Hogan and Flair when they came back to the WWE. Nearly everyone. So, by
being a bit choosier about who he loses to, Undertaker makes those
losses stick out more in peoples' minds, and I think it really propels
those peoples' careers when he does so. Remember, even HHH lost against
Taker a few years ago in Wrestlemania.
What happened to the price of gas? Wasn't this war with Iraq supposed to
do something about that? Gasoline has jumped up 30 cents a gallon since
the END of the war. It has jumped over ten cents in the past week and a
half. They say it is due to the blackout, but that is utter nonsense.
Anyone who knows anything knows that most of the gas was purchased
before the blackouts, and they are just using that as an excuse.
Kobe Bryant's clean cut image. I'm not going to sit here and debate
whether he is innocent or guilty, because quite honestly I don't know. I
wasn't in the room, I haven't talk to everyone involved in the case, so
I don't have a clue. What I do wonder is whatever happened to the image
of pro sports. It is about as tarnished as it can get, because now
murder and rape and other violent crimes are involved. Everyone from
Baylor basketball, to Kobe, to OJ, to Ray Lewis has had their
reputations tarnished, or downright put in jail like Tyson. Every sport
has been affected, and sports is never going to be the same.
Why I mentioned the above? Because you don't hear about alot of the
stuff above when it comes to wrestling. When Miss Elizabeth died, and it
was suspected foul play might have been a factor, that was big news. For
some reason, violence really hasn't hit wrestling as hard as it did
other sports. I'm not saying they're squeaky clean by any standards. You
hear about the drugs, painkillers, steriod abuse, and things along those
lines. But you don't hear about wrestlers shooting other people,
involved with a lot of criminal activity, raping women, or stuff like
that. Either they cover it up better, or it just doesn't happen all that
often. When the occasional story like Tazz exposing himself here in
Pittsburgh to 16 year olds when he was in ECW, or Brock v. Henning in an
airplane do break, they make big news because you just don't hear about
them all that often. Kinda makes you wonder doesn't it?
What the chances are of Lex Luger, Sting, and Bret Hart coming back. I
think you have a better shot at Mars colliding with the Earth. Sting has
an outside shot of coming back, but the problem I see with that is the
WWE may be a bit gunshy about plopping down a bunch of money for another
guy who isn't going to work a whole bunch of dates. He may draw
initially, but he isn't going to draw top dollar. The economy is in a
slump, people are only going to come out when they can. If you put on a
good show, people will come out no matter who is wrestling. If you try
and get by with style over substance, that will only last so far. Don't
believe me? Take a look at summer movies. When the first of the big
special effects movies came out (ie Indepence Day- grossly overrated),
people came out in droves to see it because it was something new and
different. Even though there wasn't much to the movie, and it was
actually stupid, the special effects were awesome. Now, you can do a
movie driven by special effects, but the audience has seen it already,
so there better be something more otherwise you're going to have a big
flop on your hands. In other words, throw the stars out there against
each other, and you will have people come out initially. But once
they've seen them already, you better have better storylines, more
intriguing match-ups, more interesting feuds, or people will stop
coming. Period the end.
How Goldberg became so clumsy. Everytime I see him now, he's falling
down off of something. He can't even walk down the ramp without tripping
over his own two feet. The minute he did that, did you have the feeling
McMahon was in the back saying "there is no way in hell this guy is
going to be my champ."?
Whatever happened to RVD and Benoit? They are two of the best wrestlers
the WWE has had in some time, and yet Christian has had more title
reigns in the last year than the two of them combined! I mean, I don't
want to knock Christian, but let's be honest here. Both RVD and the
Crippler should have gold around their waste more times than not. They
both draw, they are very good at what they do, and most important they
can both take a bad wrestling match and make it into something worth
watching.
Where the whole thing with Eddie Guerrero is going? He's good, but he's
bad. He's funny, but you're supposed to take him seriously. I like the
feuds that are developing around the US Belt. You have Rhyno, Benoit,
and Tajiri going after it, and all three can run with that title.
Guerrero is the lynchpin, and he's doing a wonderful job with it. The
only thing that makes you overlook the fact that the WWE can't decide
what he is is the fact that Guerrero pulls it off so flawlessly. He
moves pretty well from comedy to serious. Unlike the Intercontinental
Belt which hasn't had a serious feud yet in Christian phase II, the US
Belt is off and running.
How it is possible Matt Hardy has gotten so much further than Jeff? Jeff
was the more popular, the bigger risk taker, the cuter one I guess, and
teenage girls loved him. Since teenage girls are a demographic that the
WWE doesn't hit all that often, one would've thought Jeff Hardy would've
gone alot further than his bland brother at the time. However, they took
a chance with Matt, and saddled him with a gimmick. It worked big time.
Mattitude was the perfect fit, and Matt Hardy has become a top second
tier wrestler. He is interesting, has charisma, and shows he actually
has facial expressions. Good job.
Well, that's about it for now....so until HHH can wrestle without
tearing, straining, dislocating, dislodging, or just plain hurting
something....keep reading...sincerely the Novak Notebook.
Retirement actually mean anything? That is a question that has plagued me for some time, because it never seems to really happen. In the world of sports, retirement is just a long break.
Why do I bring this up, you ask? Quite honestly, because I really didn't want to talk about HHH screwing up RAW, or how I was actually starting to route for Goldberg. I didn't want to mention Undertaker, Angle, or the impending wedding of Stephanie and HHH.The other thing I really didn't want to talk about was how having Shane v. Kane would really devalue RVD, since he lost against Kane. So, I decided to talk about something else.
Everyone from Sugar Ray Leonard to Jim Palmer have retired. All of them have come back and tried to recapture their youth. All athletes seem to have a problem letting go of their sport, and it seems like its especially true in wrestling.
The question I have is does a wrestler ever retire? I haven't seen one yet that retires. They just seem to go away for awhile, then they turn around and pop up somewhere down the road.
Everyone retires eventually. Only in the entertainment world do people seem to come back. It happens with actors, directors and others in Hollywood, but I am focusing on the sports world.
Why is it someone who has had very good career in sports, retires and then turns around and comes back later? What are they trying to prove? Who are they trying to impress?
I think part of it is because they never truly get rid of the competitive spirit. They need to get their fix, so they get back in the sport that they never truly abandoned. Michael Jordan, Mario Lemieux, Gary Anderson, and many others have retired. Then they turn around and come back, to varying degrees of success. Many feel that it tarnishes their image, while many feel that it does nothing to hurt their reputation.
The worst case in this was in baseball. A man named Minnie Minoso played baseball for the Chicago White Sox in the 1950s. He retired, but every DECADE, he made a return to play at least one game. He did this through the 1990s. He was trying for some type of record of playing in the most decades, but it just became silly. He made his news and got his fifteen minutes of fame every decade. Only recently, he retired simply because the team didn't allow him to come back anymore.
Now, I'm not talking about people who should retire. That is another story for another time. People who stay too long in a sport is another subject matter. I am talking about those who just show up occasionally to show us that we may have missed something many moons ago.
Hulk Hogan retired and came back. Ric Flair came to the WWE to basically become a manager or upper level person. Instead of being able to retire, he was put in Evolution and made to wrestle.
Did we really need the last incarnation of Roddy Piper? I doubt anyone would've been disappointed if he didn't show back up.
I think the fans get excited when they see a legend get back in the ring. The initial response and the memories upon seeing the wrestler gets the fans interested. They remember great matches or whatever they liked about the wrestlers.
But what happens when the wrestler comes back on regular basis? You get Roddy Piper looking silly and becoming McMahon's little toadstool.
You get Jake Roberts snorting coke and going to the bathroom in a bucket in the back of the stadium. He has lost his place in wrestling history when people see him in "Beyond the Mat."
You get Terry Funk who never retires, or Mick Foley who doesn't give getting beaten up every once in awhile. You get Abdullah the Butcher still whipping out a fork every once in awhile.
Most of the wrestlers who the WWE aren't interested show up on the independent circuit. Believe it or not guys like Dusty Rhodes, Abdullah the Butcher, Jerry Lawler, Road Warriors, and others who were major stars still wrestler the independent circuit. Even Bruno Sammartino wrestled a little bit into the 1980s. All of the old-timers came back at one point or the other.
Now this gives future generations to see a Verne Gagne, Bruno Sammartino, Superstar Billy Graham, Roddy Piper or whoever comes along. But they usually end up seeing a watered down version or what used to be a great star. Now, when that future generation sees this former star, they're going to wonder what the big deal is. When all of those young kids saw Roddy Piper come back, they were probably wondeing what the big deal was. They were wondering why the older people said he was the biggest and baddest on the block, yet he had a hard time with a crippled kid
Why do these people come back? They can't get it out of their system, and they want to return. They are allowed to do that, but it comes at a price. I believe they tarnish their reputation. I mean who hasn't beaten Ric Flair or Hulk Hogan upon their return? It is supposed to push the young kids when they get a win over a legend, but when everyone and their mother gets a win, the win doesn't mean as much.
I really think that when a wrestler retires, he should stay retired. Although I will say Mae Young sometimes takes bigger bumps than some of the wrestlers, she should stay retired. I want to remember guys like Hogan, Savage, and Piper like they were. I don't want to remember them losing to everyone and anyone who comes along. Like I said, they have every right to come back whenever they want, but I think it does them more harm than good. They have nothing to prove, and everything to lose.
Well, until I win the Stacey Kiebler services for life contest........keep reading
Is this, that and the other thing......
HHH is actually surprised that Hollywood doesn't really know who he is? How arrogant is this guy? He actually thinks he's the straw that stirs the drink, but if that were the case, the ratings for RAW wouldn't continue to sink. It has been obvious for some time that the fans aren't booing HHH because he's the top heel. They're booing him because they're tired of him and need him to go away. I never knew so many people who were routing for Goldberg that didn't like him, simply because they didn't like HHH more.
Does Vince McMahon truly believe that when ratings sink, the answer is more McMahon?
I am so glad Shane McMahon didn't beat Kane. Although I respect Shane and his style, they could not let Shane beat Kane without making all of the other wrestlers (especially RVD) look bad. If Shane beats Kane, then what does it say when Kane kills RVD?
Having Lita back is great. She looks great, and I love the Daisy Duke shorts too. But she also adds a lot to a woman's division that was starting to get a little stale. I think the division is so much better than it has been during my lifetime (including the Rock n' Wrestling Days), but with the same girls competing for the title, it was growing a little old. You had Molly win the title, which was cool, but then you have Trish, Gayle, Jackie, Victoria, Ivory and Jazz. Ivory and Jackie have become the jobbers of the crew, so its always the same three or four women competing against the champ. Now adding Lita is great for the division, and some spice should definitely perk things up.
That being said, does anyone wonder why the men's divisions aren't as exiciting as they used to be? Here's one reason; ppv. Now you may be confused by this analysis, but let me explain. When you have either champ, they usually have four weeks or so to get a rivalry going for the next ppv. Therefore, they don't screw around with people they aren't going to wrestle for the ppv. They focus on one guy. It's okay for the ppv, but it does tend to get boring for the fans, especially if it is someone they're not interested in seeing. Having the ppv's spread out a little more may end up helping this situation out a bit, and allowing for more feuds. But the way it stands now, you have one feud per month. That tends to get old as well.
So, even though the year's not over yet, here are some of my views and awards for both programs.
RAW
Smackdown
That's it for now.....so until the Steelers actually beat the Titans, keep reading....
Are plummeting for the WWE. Nobody has an answer as to why everything has fallen flat for them and their ratings. I still maintain it is a combination of things, but I honestly don't have the answers either.
Let's take a look around. Half of the staff here admits they don't watch wrestling as much as they used to, if at all. Others don't have a problem watching it, but don't make it part of their religion to watch, so it gets seen here and there. Me? I still watch every Monday and Thursday, but I don't have a problem turning it off or over to Monday Night Football if things don't appeal to me.
Why has it become this way? Like I said, I don't have any answers any more than anyone else does. The only sport whose viewing has not gone down over the years in pro football. Ratings for baseball and basketball are slumping and sinking, while hockey ratings are almost invisible. So, not only are wrestling's ratings off, but most of the other major sports are slipping in the ratings too.
Is this an excuse for wrestling? No, not really. But it may be something they have to look at and realize. As I've stated numerous times before, there are many factions as to why something is the way it is, and the slip in the ratings with the WWE falls into that category.
This isn't as simple as what happened in the early 1990s. They were coming in with the stupidest and silliest characters, and fans were insulted. Everything from Nailz, to Duke the Dumpster, to Doink, to the Repo Man were used in the WWF at the time. It was stupid and silly to see a pro like Bret Hart or Roddy Piper to defend the title against the Mountie. I think this type of trend after the massive success of the Undertaker turned many fans away, and therefore the ratings fell to all time lows.
Now the ratings have fallen again, but this time it isn't because of the stupid characters the WWE has run out there time and again. Most of the wrestlers have come out to wrestle, not to come out in silly costumes. So, what is the problem this time around? Like I said, the answer isn't a simple one.
I think professional wrestling has a die hard following, and the only way they reach out to others in when they cross over to somewhere else. The Rock n' Wrestling connection is the prime example for this, and I seriously doubt wrestling would've been as popular in the 1980s without it. Everyone working with it realized it was going to be huge, and they exploited it as much as they could. It made stars out of Hulk Hogan, Roddy Piper, and Jimmy Snuka. There really hasn't been anything like that crossover since then, although there have been a few attempts.
I also believe this is something that has been happening for a few years. The WCW didn't see it coming and they were forced to sell. ECW tried to stay afloat, but through improper management they folded as well. Now, the empire McMahon has dreamed about all of his life is his, yet there isn't anything he can do with it. It's kind of like the old saying; what's the use of having a kingdom if you don't have anyone to rule over? McMahon has a wrestling empire, yet nobody wants to see it anymore.
There are other questions involved with the problems wrestling has incurred. Are they too boring? Too dangerous? Is the split working? Too much HHH or McMahon? Not enough stars? Is it because there is no direction? Are there too many other things to distract us nowadays? Is it because there is a lack of interest? Is it because there is too much disappointment? No competition? There are many questions, and to the WWE's credit they have actually tried to answer all of these questions or at least address them.
The WWE doesn't have an answer yet. They keep trying, and they seemingly strike out more than they get it right. The main problem I have had with them lately is way too much HHH, yet he continued to hold the title long after he should have given it up. Other than that, I really can't put a finger on why the WWE isn't the same as it was. But now, I have a new idea, and I'm going to explore it with the end of this article.
How many times have the writers written about the wrestlers they grew up watching? There was more reaction for a Curt Henning tribute than for anything else that had happen in the last YEAR of pro wrestling. Admittedly, I stayed away from that, simply because everyone else had something to say and I couldn't have added anything better than what they had written. But it did get me thinking. Why Curt Henning?
He was a really good wrestler, but he wasn't the top draw in the WWF, ever. He was either a hi mid-carder or low top tier wrestler. He hardly ever battled for the heavyweight title, and when he did, you knew he wasn't going to win. Yet when he died, everyone remembered him as if he were Bruno Sammartino. No offense to Curt, because I happen to think he was a great entertainer and a wonderful personality during a time when gimmicks ruled, but he won the Intercontinental Title less the Goldust, and held it less time than the Honkeytonk Man, at least if memory serves. The real reason everyone bemoaned his loss is because they grew up watching him. He was one of their fond memories. This got my thinking.
Whose left? Ric Flair and nobody else. I grew up with Flair, Sting, Piper, Hogan, Savage, Steamboat, Rhodes, Race, JYD, and George the Animal. Most of the people on this site pretty much have the same memories. I never really connected to the "new" wrestlers. I like Austin, Rock, Benoit, and Angle, but they don't hold the same place in my heart and memories as the others do.
I have been to one WWF event in my life. Why? It was Piper and Hogan against Flair and Vicious as the main event. I mean, I really couldn't miss that. I haven't been to one since. That says a lot.
I was excited about the ECW, because they were selling an attitude and style more than they were a wrestler. They made it exciting and fun, even though they beat the living hell out of each other. Outside of that, I never attended a live event since that huge tag team match.
What does all of this say? It means I will occasionally miss a telecast because I do not have the same connection with the wrestlers that I used to. It would be the equivalent of a soap opera being on for years, and then just changing everyone in the cast all at once. The show would be over. That's why they slowly introduce new characters, and when an actor becomes too old or wants to move on, they work real hard to find someone to play the same character. You can't do that in wrestling, but it is an inherent problem.
Younger fans have a different perspective than I do of today's wrestling, and that is fine. But younger fans also have money to spread around to other things other than wrestling that weren't around when I was growing up. Cds, DVDs, video games for three or four different systems, how many cable channels, concerts, after school programs. All of these things were either not around or have been increased dramatically since I was a kid. This makes it difficult to compete for that teenage dollar.
There are other things too that haven't helped the WWE, some of which is their own fault. By feeling cocky and leaving the USA network, their ratings have never been the same, and I think they have actually lived to regret that mistake. Telling everyone it is wrestling entertainment, rather than keeping th shroud of mystery on it hurt them also. Not only that, but don't undervalue the death of Owen Hart in leaving a bad taste in people's mouth. That, along with the steroid scandal, deaths due to drugs, and the wrestlers not quite clicking with the fans as much as they used to also contribute to the declines in numbers.
Now, I'm not here to say how great the old days were, because that is silly. I think anyone who makes that argument lives in the past and doesn't want to see what's going on around them. But, in a case like this, when you are comparing their ratings from years ago to now, you can't help but draw comparisons. However, today's wrestlers are bigger, stronger, more athletic, and they can give as good a performance as anyone from years ago. And that may be another of the problems with wrestling, because it hasn't changed all that much in the last 20 years.
It's for show, and it is flashy. The hits and moves may look better, and they sure do more than they used to, but Flair's matches always lasted an hour, so ironman matches weren't uncommon years ago. People like to compare, whether it's Unitas to Marino or Bonds to Ruth, or Magic to Kobe, or Gretzky to Mario. People like to compare. In wrestling it's the same way, but some of those wrestlers were actually still around not that long ago. By having them wrestle and lose, many of the older fans tuned in to see the older wrestles, but then most likely tuned back out as soon as their wrestlers were done.
I said above that wrestling has many problems. If they are shooting for much higher ratings, they are going to have to address these problems, plain and simple. The way the ratings have been, it doesn't look like they are going anywhere anytime soon. They have a few highs and lows, and actually having the Goldberg champ ratings low, that might be a reason HHH points to for him to say how great he is. They will need to address what is wrong and what they need to do to fix it. I don't think the answer is that simple, because I think there is more than one problem.
Maybe what the WWE needs to do is alter what it is. Go from trying to be mainstream and develop a sort of cult following. Buck the system once again. Take a page from the book of the ECW (and the old WWF) and be the rebel on the block. Be completely un-PC. Do whatever you want, and have fun with it. They've started doing that with Zack, beating up Mae Young and Moolah, but maybe they need to do more. They can't have as many jaw-dropping matches as they used to, simply because of the injury factor, but do other things to have fans jaws drop. If you do that, people will want to tune in the following week to see what you're going to do next. Then, they're going to have to be happy with the ratings their getting, and they may even get a few fans back. Who knows?
Anyway, that's my opinion and I'm sticking with it. So, until I start my traveling minstrel show, keep reading
How much better RAW has been of late, and I couldn't agree more. Even though the numbers are still down, the product they are putting out thre every Monday night is pretty entertaining. Smackdown of late isn't nearly as good as it was a few months ago, even though bringing back Paul Heyman might give the program a much needed boost.
Even though HHH managed to keep the focus on himself throughout his absence by using the bounty on Goldberg and the return of Batista to Evolution, he still hasn't been on the program nearly as much as he had been. Therefore the fans get a much needed break from the twenty minute diatribes at the beginning of each show, where he would proclaim himself the greatest wrestler ever and how he has beaten everyone. Now I'm not a big Goldberg fan, but it is refreshing to just sit back and watch someone go out and kick everyone's ass, say very little and head home. What is that old say? Actions speak louder than words.
On the subject of old, it was a shame the way Roddy Piper and Hulk Hogan left the WWE. Both were the top stars in their prime and both left basically humiliated and used poorly. Now I wasn't thrilled about seeing both men come back and wrestle, but I think both men could've added spark to the program in their own way. They have charisma to spare, draw fans in, yet when they were used poorly both their old fans and any new fans were instantly turned off. Hopefully both will come back for Wrestlemania and give us more memories to cherish.
Just a quick question....who hasn't written a book in the WWE? I mean, does the WWE really think all of these people have that much of an interesting story to tell to justify writing a book? The WWE complained recently that sales of their books have been way down as of late, and all I could think of was....no kidding? Look who you've been writing books for.....the Hardy's, Jim Ross, Lita, Brock Lesnar. Although in the world of wrestling each of these people is a star in their own rights, in the real world not too many people really care about them. When Mankind wrote his book, there were several key factors involved with it. First and foremost, he wrote it. He didn't have help, and he didn't have someone else do it for him. He wrote it. Second he had been all over the world and in some of the toughest and most brutal matches, yet had a great dispossion, so people were attracted to his charater. And third, we hadn't been flooded with books about wrestlers. The subsequent books that followed were of higher profile stars such as Angle, Rock, and Hogan. After awhile, people realized they were basically a promotion tool for the WWE and they stopped buying them. Even though Mick Foley's book falls into the same category, people wanted to hear the whole story, not just how great the WWE is. That is one reason why Bobby Heenan's book sold reasonable well. He could tell the whole truth whenever he wanted in his book, because the WWE wasn't behind the thing.
Speaking of nobody listening, which I really wasn't but oh well. It's my column and you have to listen to every damn word I write. Anyway, I digress. I hear the Macho Man put out a CD? I didn't know he could talk, much less sing. Seriously, I heard the song where he rips Hogan up, and if the rest of the album is the same, I hope the people that bought it can get their money back. But here's a question to the people that bought it....what did you really expect from Savage?
How is it possible that Zack Gowen has such a big head? Isn't this utterly ridiculous. As you read on the website, there is talk that if he gets fired, he would slap them with a lawsuit. Oh really? I would think them giving you a chance and a national spotlight, not to mention major storylines would prove they were anything but discriminatory. If you want to argue that you keep losing matches, get in a long line behind guys like Rico, Steven Richards, Val Venis, Goldust, and other jobbers. You should be considered grateful that you even got the opportunity, because while it was impressive that you got in the ring and did what you did, you only have that moonsault. You can't move around the ring, and the other wrestlers have to look bad so you look good. But the WWE stuck with you for some time, because it was a feel good story. Granted it made them look good, but still the fact they stuck with you says something, especially when other wrestlers are getting cut or dropped from programs. Plus, you're a rookie. So a one legged rookie is going to march right in and start beeating everyone? What would that say about everyone in the WWE? Apparently this kid has a big head, and maybe Brock should have really thrown him around good.
Now for some other loose ends and other things......
Even though the Undertaker is not the wrestler he used to be, I would say he has been the most consistant over the last decade. He was out of shape for awhile, but he looks like he rededicated himself lately and appears he could wrestle his new style of matches for some time.
I would say right now that the future of wrestling is John Cena, RVD, Chris Jericho, and Shark Boy. You heard it hear, eventually Shark Boy will make it into the WWE and he will be huge.
Well, that about wraps up another edition of the Novak Notebook, so I hope you enjoyed it as much as I enjoyed writing it. If not.....your loss. So until Torrie Wilson threatens me with a bra and panties match, keep reading
Although I really don't know what I mean by that at this time in the conversation. I'm sure it will come to me by the time I'm done writing this episode of the Notebook, unless I'm just making this stuff up like it was a bad Seinfeld show. Who really knows?
Chapter Two. What makes a good wrestler a lot like a cool comic book hero? This is a question that has plagued mankind for nearly not long enough. It isn't something that is brought up, much less discussed online. It should be though, because believe it or not, unlike the first paragraph, this actually does make sense.
Think of two of the top comic book heroes of all time. Batman and Spider-man. The two of them have starred in big box office movies, have historic careers in the world of comic books, and also have two of the more complex personalities in the world of comics. Wait a minute? Oh, this isn't about comic books, this is about wrestling. Okay, forget all of that. What makes these two huge in the world comics is not all of that stuff mentioned above, but who they fight every month in the comic books.
Spider-man has so many different villains. Electro, Mysterio, Hobgoblin, Kraven, Venom, Carnage, Sandman, not to mention two of the biggest; Dr. Octopus and the Green Goblin. They are colorful, and most of the time they will sell the comic book along with the hero inside.
Batman. His is just a long list, and it is called the Rogue's Gallery. They even named the prison and it has become famous. Arkham Asylum is the name of the prison that holds such famous villains such as the Mad Hatter, the Riddler, Bane, Poison Ivy, Two Face, the Penguin, Ra Ghul, Catwoman, Clayface, Mr. Freeze, and the one and only Joker.
What does all of this have to do with wrestlers? Well, nothing if you stopped reading by now, thinking the Notebook has flipped his lid. However, what this all points to is that sometimes the strength of the hero and the willingness for the people to keep reading the books relies heavily on the adversaries he faces. People keep reading because they love to watch the Joker take on Batman over and over, just to see how it will turn out this time. They can't get enough, if it is done properly.
Wrestling is much the same way. McMahon has built up all of these Supermen, but much like Superman, he usually only puts them up against one man at a time. Superman got old with the comic readers, because he really had nothing left to face. Luthor was growing old, and they didn't come up with anything new. Along came Doomsday, and then they worked really hard on creating a new type of Superman.
McMahon has to do the same thing. Think of the Glory days of wrestling. Hulk Hogan may have fought one person at a time, but he had a plethora of people working to take away his title. He had his Mr. Wonderful, Muraco, King Kong Bundy, Andre, Slaughter, Bobby Heenan masterminding things, and of course the Joker; Roddy Piper. Most of the successful title runs that created excitement over the years had more than one wrestler going after the title. Even the successful Intercontinental Title runs had more than one person chasing the title. Now, it seems like they gear for one person per month, then they move on.
In a way, this isn't the comic books. They can gear for one person a month, because they are creating a whole backstory as well. Wrestling doesn't have the backstory that the way the comics have, so they need to fill it using bigger than life characters.
That is why right now, smackdown is a load of fun. Everyone seems to be gearing up toward Brock Lesnar right now. Chris Benoit, John Cena, and Bob Holley right now are chasing Brock. Not to mention, it looks like they may be having other people starting in on the chase. These guys can chase the title, while still fighting other people like the Big Show and whoever else. Cena can still be in the title hunt yet be fighting the Big Show. Hell, Undertaker is still in the title hunt and he's not even doing anything right now.
Goldberg has a few chasing him, but they are both at the same time. Kane and HHH are both wrestling and chasing Goldberg. Now, I guess they're trying to show Goldberg as the guy who can overcome anything. Kind of like the modern Hulk Hogan with a much edgier attitude. He needs bigger and more competition if he's ever going to reach the status of Hulk Hogan.
That is one of the problems HHH has had as a title holder. He has beaten everyone, but none of the feuds he has had would be considered classic feuds. It's not that people didn't care about him or Jericho or whoever had less than successful title runs, it's just that the runs they had weren't anything to write home about. HHH had some decent feuds, but none of the guys he fought was ever built up as unbeatable until Goldberg. None did beat him, and so people just kept yawning and turning off their tv.
So....this is what is needed to have a successful title reign. You need a rogue's gallery to challenge you. You need a few people at a time chasing you, and you manage to wrestle one a month at the big ppv. It should look like that even though you wrestled one, you aren't relieved because you realize there are a few more guys out there ready to step up and take your belt. There should always be a threat. Some are lesser (the Mad Hatters) and some more serious (the Joker), but there should ALWAYS be a threat. If the threat isn't there, people aren't going to tune in. When Spider Man took on Venom, everyone wanted that comic book. When Spider Man took on Hydro Man, nobody really cared.
The WWE should try and start to build a rogue's gallery for every wrestler that has a title. They can do this one of two ways; one is build for each individual wrestler, or just build a stable of guys who are always in title contention. Once in awhile, they need to win to, to make the threat more believable. Bob Holley isn't as big a threat as he could be, simply because he has never really won anything. The Joker wouldn't be nearly as big a threat if he hadn't killed numerous people, including a Robin and crippled Batgirl. The threat has to be there and it has to be real. The WWE needs to do that, and they will start the long road back toward fun and excitement back in the WWE.
So, what did the pointing fingers comment mean at the end. The WWE needs to turn the fingers on HHH for preventing certain wrestlers from challenging, and themselves for not creating the excitement the fans clamor for. There are always other reasons why people don't tune in, but one thing is certain. People will not tune in if they are not excited by the product.
Until the WWE figures out how to give the Notebook his own Diva's Rogues Gallery.....
A Novak Notebook of a different color. This isn't going to deal strictly with wrestling, since wrestling isn't the only thing out there (sorry to disappoint all of you). This is going to be a commentary, along with a year end wrap-up of what happened this year, in wrestling as well as a few other areas. Now some of the views expressed are mine and mine alone, and if you do not agree, you must enjoy being wrong quite a bit.
The year in sports surprised many this year. In football, we saw all kinds of different things, including a number of new teams entering the playoffs and for the second time in three years, the Super Bowl Contenders of the year before fail to even make the playoffs. So, who wants to go to the Super Bowl now? You get a few commercials, but why on earth would you do one where you let the world know your underarms stink?
In basketball, one great retired (Michael Jordan) and a new one took his place (LeBron James). Only time will tell whether this was a good trade off or not.You know, the notebook used to be able to play basketball, but I knew my days of playing were done when I took a shot and the guy who blocked it didn't even have to jump. I just think it's unfair that the shorter you are, the further away you have to shoot. I mean, give me a seven foot body, three foot arms, let me jump five inches and I could slam dunk too.
In hockey, they seemed to have a season, but nobody really noticed. Worse yet women's professional soccer folded and nobody seemed to care. Beckham getting traded and being named in a movie made more news than women's soccer losing to Germany and having their league folded.
In entertainment, everyone is still trying to figure out what the hell the Matrix is, even after two more movies. After Kill Bill, Bill ain't dead. After The Matrix and Kill Bill, it seems doubtful that many more movies and their sequels will come out so quickly, one after the other. Although with the success of Lord of the Rings, it sounds like it might be the future to make movies back to back, and then release them one year at a time.
Elsewhere in entertainment, Britney's smooch with Madonna was the talk of the town. Paris Hilton happens to come out with an "embarassing video" just in time to promote her new show. Bob Hope passes away, along with people like Johnny Cash, John Ritter, and many many others. Orlando Bloom may be the first person EVER to be in two movies released the same year that went on to gross over 300 million dollars each! And he had a pretty big starring role in each, Pirates of the Caribbean and Lord of the Rings: Return of the King. And after all of that, most people probably still don't know who I'm talking about. If you don't know....look it up.
This is a year where this country started a war, because it couldn't find the man responsible for attacking us during 9-11. Now, don't confuse my issues with the war with problems with the troops. I will always supports the troops out there in the world (as everyone should), but I do not like the fact that this country started a war with another country, who wasn't doing anything. Sure, I don't like Saddaam Hussein, and I wouldn't have lost any sleep if a group of guys would've taken him out. But considering the number of terrorists and dictators in countries like Iran, North Korea, China, Vietnam, large portions of Africa and South America, picking out Sadaam was just ridiculous. What had he done to other countries in the last ten years? He was an easy target because our President knew he could tear him apart. What's next? People from another country looks at Bush cross-eyed and Bush orders their country attacked? Does anyone know that most terrorists actually come out of Saudi Arabia? If it were me, I would've just left him in that hole and poked him with a stick every now and then and yell "the Americans are coming!". Anyway, off of my soap box.
Also this year, reality shows have officially saturated television. They have reality that is fake, fake that is real....real is real, until it is faked, then fake people acting real, or something like that. DVD has completely replaced tapes (some stores don't even carry tapes anymore). Now the debate is whether blue laser or red laser DVDs will be the wave of the future. Or is that the pill controversy from the Matrix? Sports cards have featured everything from pieces of uniforms to pieces of an official Babe Ruth bat. What's next? Pieces of Ted Williams' frozen skin on a card? Whatever happened to collecting good players and sets?
Cable has reach 800 channels or something like that, and there still isn't anything on. Every other channel seems to have bass fishing or figure skating. The internet has broadened to unseen horizons. Why just the other day, it was announced there are over 1 million porn sites, with new ones added every day. And, you still can't find what you're looking for unless you type it in exactly, but if you did that, you probably wouldn't need to look it up to begin with.
Compact Discs have started to fall in price, but not much. After only 20 years or so of promises, the record industry was backed into a corner with pirating running rampant, and had to start dropping prices. Places like National Ripoff Mart started to close shortly there after.
The Rock started out as the new action hero to replace people like the Governator!!! and Rocky 6. His stumble with the Rundown hurt him a little, but his next film or two should make the big difference. Jack was as perverse as ever, chasing younger women, but he seems to have broadened his horizons and has started to chase Diane as well. Did Tom Hanks even make a movie this year?? Jack made two. And really and truly...is it any surprise that Arnold got elected by California? I mean they already had one actor as govenor and his co-star was a chimp. Speaking of Ronnie, congrats on being the oldest former President ever, although we could tell you that you are a twelve year old boy and you would believe us (Of course we would have to hold Michael Jackson away from you-unless you were Catholic of course).
The talk of the a new cult movie has emerged with the Suicide Club. An interesting and yet perverse Japanese movie that will leave you talking.
More dotcoms closed their doors, as did more mom and pop stores, while Wal Mart seemed to pop up everywhere and anywhere. I'm waiting for Wal Mart to get into air travel, since that area is already struggling, with more of them closing as well. You can shop on the plane for discount prices, while flying on something that was put together late at night by a whole bunch of people with a fifth grade education. Gives ya a nice warm fuzzy feeling doesn't it?
We've had a year of mudslides, floods, hurricanes, and tornados. But once again, wildfires seemed to have done the most damage in this country once again. Unless you count Elizabeth Taylor getting married again.
I still haven't seen a plan to turn the economy around. Guess the way and capturing Sadaam hasn't gone as well as Dubbya had hoped. His dad did the same thing after the Gulf War. He sat on his posterior for over a year while his approval rating went from an all time high for a sitting President to under 40 %. He tried to promise he would do more in a second term, and I guess a lot of people thought like me and asked the question "Why didn't you do it while you could?" And why is it everytime this George has a speech, he looks like a deer caught in the headlights?
Does this country actually make anything anymore? It kinda makes stuff, ships it out to other countries to have them put it together, then ship it back here? This confuses me til this day. So if nobody actually makes it, then who owns it? Ugh
The church had issues, both the Episcopal Church and the Catholic Church. It does seem odd when you can mention the Catholic Church and Michael Jackson in the same sentence, and it makes sense somehow.
Kobi Bryant is in trouble, but boy does he have good news. Nicole Richie is willing to sleep with him! Wow, you could just bowl me over with a feather with that one. Who wouldn't she sleep with seems like a more important question. I saw her eyeing up that little kid on "Simple Life", but I think she might have to fight Michael Jackson over him. Unless he's Catholic of course.
Has Robert Blake stopped cawing like a bird in court yet?
Oh yeah, there was some wrestling this year too.....
HHH is champ...isn't that where we started the year?
Shawn Michaels has actually made a full fledged comeback and unlike others who have come back, he has not embarassed himself while doing it. Many others have come back, yet not to the degree or success with Shawn. And he hasn't looked bad in the ring doing it.
The WWE is still riding high, sort of. It is still the company everyone wants to go to to shine. Yet, since it doesn't have any competition it doesn't seem to have the same spark or flare that it once had. It is a combination of timing, and them losing their top draws (Rock, Stone Cold, Angle) for long periods of time. They can rebound, and they have a good core of young wrestlers to do it (Orton, Cena, Brock, Jericho, RVD) to do it. McMahon may actually be right about this Wrestlemania and let the old guard go, so the new guard can shine.
The new crop of talent for the WWE has certainly established itself over the last year. John Cena has exploded onto the scene, and Brock was launched. He's getting better and we'll see how long he lasts. Orton has taken his bumps and early injuries have hurt his progress, but he looks like someone who could replace Flair for ego. He's a little rough around the edges, but we'll wait and see. We'll have to wait and see how they do over the next year.
Has any wrestler broken their neck since the beginning of this column? I mean, how many more wrestlers are going to break their necks before they figure out that landing on it might be a bad idea. It's kinda like hitting your head with a hammer. It might show you're tough, but after awhile you aren't going to know your name from your age, because you won't have no brains left.
It looks like Kurt Angle may soon have to hang them up, and that would be a shame. It would definitely be a career that ended too soon. By the contrary, it looks like Goldberg may be ending his WWE run very soon, and it looks like most people won't care. This is a man who could've gone very far in the business, but since his carelessness has cost others their careers(ie: Bret Hart) and his drive for only money has cost him time in the ring, his career has amounted to not much of anything. I mean, really. He was a borderline pro football player, who nobody had ever heard of. He was built up in WCW, and thinks he's something. Dude...a little wake up call...you were MADE. It was given to you, you didn't earn a damn thing. Now falling to HHH would give anyone heartburn, but swallow it, and try and figure a way to get around it. Or take your ball, pout, and run off to Japan. Nobody will know who you are ten years from now, much like it is in football right now.
We've lost many wrestlers over the last year. Too many to name, and I wouldn't do justice to anyone if I just named a few. Some were bigger names in this business than others, yet they were all out there to entertain us the way they knew best. Sure, they got paid to entertain us, but they still had to perform otherwise their careers would be over.Many of them a surprise, a few weren't. My hope for this year is that these surprises just stop. We don't need them anymore. And, if you are not in shape to get into the ring, please don't get in the ring....we don't need another death in the ring because the guy was too old and out of shape to be in the ring.
Has Nash or HHH torn anything since the start of this column?? Has Hogan's fake teeth or Piper's gut fallen out yet? Didn't miss much since the beginning of the column have ya?
My picks for the year.....
Anyway, that's my picks, rants and raves this time around. Until next time.......when Santa plants a Trish-sized (not Ferrell-sized) elf under the notebook Christmas tree....keep reading,
Who watches wrestling has matches they would love to see. Dream matches they are called. I am no different. I have seen so many matches over the years that there are plenty of dream matches that I would've loved to see. I wanted to see Piper and Savage team up, destroying everything in their path. I would have loved to see Bret in his prime fight Benoit now. Angle v Backland. Superstar Billy Graham v Jesse Ventura. Big Show in his prime v Vader in his prime. Rey Mysterio v Dynamite Kid. Legion of Doom v NWO falls count anywhere match. These are the types of matches (along with many more) that people dream about, but unfortunately for various reasons, fans will never get to see.
Lately, especially during Wrestlemania, the WWE tries to accomodate those dream matches. They realize people tend to think back to their youth more during Wrestlemania than at other ppv events. They brought back Okerland and Heenan for the gimmick battle royal, Piper, Hogan, NWO, and many others make their return right around the big event. It seems like the WWE is going to try and do that again this year. They're going to try and make a Goldberg/Lesnar match, or a Benoit/HHH match.They're still trying to get something out of Hogan, and the Undertaker's deadman gimmick may see a return. The real question is does it help the Royal Rumble when the WWE starts gearing up for the Wrestlemania event at the beginning of the year? The rumble used to be important, but now is just a stepping stone for Wrestlemania.
Now I'm never one to point fingers, but doesn't this just kind of make the Royal Rumble a moot point. If they can pretty much do what they want with the matches anyway, why worry about who is going to win the Royal Rumble. They change the rules, twist things around, and also have matches at RAW to determine who really wins the Rumble. They actually continue the ppv the next night? Doesn't make sense.
Remember when Jake sitting in the corner during the Rumble was considered a novel idea? Or just getting out of the ring for too long was grounds for not being allowed back in? What has happened to all of that? I know it's all for show and whatever, but you need to at least make it somewhat believable for the fans to like it. You keep having people run out of the ring, disappear for awhile, and then pop back in to win? That is just silly. What they need to do is clamp back down and make the rules relevant again. If they do that, some respect will come back to the Rumble. Not only that but they need to have someone win that people wouldn't expect to win. Add some surprise back to the Rumble. I'm not talking about a complete stiff winning like Hacksaw Jim Duggan, but a little surprise is needed a little bit. I mean when it comes down to Austin, Rock, or something like that every frickin' year......everyone stops caring.
On the flip side, I do like what they are doing with the Rumble. They seem to be playing everyone up in the Rumble. Angle, Benoit, and Goldberg have all gotten serious face time with their bids for the Rumble, and that makes it exiciting when you don't have a clue as to who might win.
Now, since we're talking about dream match-ups, I'm going to put in my dream matches, but they're a bit different. Like the last column, I am mixing wrestling with stuff happening around the world, hopefully with some humor and truth mixed in.
Wolverine v Freddy Kruegar
Paris Hilton v Pamela Anderson
Mini Me v Angry Elf (King Kong Bundy referee)
Hilary Duff v Mandy Moore
Johnny English v Inspector Clouseau
Pinhead and the Cenobytes v The Seinfeld cast
Mike Ditka v Billy Martin
Britney Spears v. Young Madonna
George Bush v Anna Nicole Smith
Bill Clinton v Wilt Chamberlain
Donald Trump v Bill Gates
Michael Jackson v Tammy Fae Baker
Demi Moore v Cher
Jennifer Lopez v Howard Stern
Rush Limbaugh v Archie Bunker
Colin Powell v Oliver North
N'SYNC v Mennudo
Robert Blake v Phil Spector (OJ guest referee)
Whitney Houston v Steven Seagal
Bruce Lee v Elvis
Christina Aguilera v Lil' Kim
Calista Flockhart v Kate Moss
Gary Coleman v Tatoo (Webster guest referee)
Maculay Culkin v Bubbles the Chimp
And finally......
Anyone who knows all the Survivor winners
**** The preceding matches were inspired by Celebrity Deathmatch, when it first came out.
Well, until I am put in a special threeway match with Trish Stratus and Stacy Kiebler, keep reading.....Sincerely, the
Novak Notebook.
The Royal Rumble is over and the next big thing as far as the WWE is concerned Wrestlemania XX. The WWE has a ppv in February called No Way Out, but should be called No Body Cares. Everything from here on out is gearing up for Wrestlemania and the special feel of that event. There is nothing wrong with that. I think everything should culminate at one big event every year. The World Series, Super Bowl, Stanley Cup, NBA Finals, March Madness or whatever your sport of choice ends up being determined in one major event at the end of that sport's season. Why should wrestling be any different? Well, it shouldn't. Everything should head toward a climatic conclusion at Wrestlemania. With it being the biggest ppv (and first ever) of the wrestling year, everything should point to it.
That is not what this column is about this time around. Now I have had fun with several of my newer columns, and I will continue to do so with future columns as I see fit. Afterall, it is my column and I can do what I want with it. But this time around, I was sitting around pondering some things after the Rumble and thought they may make a good column.
Normally when you read a column criticizing a sport or movie, or something along those lines, the critics tend to rip into whatever they are discussing but they don't offer any better solutions. I have done this, so I am not saying I am better than other writers who have done this. However, I will admit that while I am tearing into something I don't have any solutions to the problems. I am just smart enough to point out the problems, but not smart enough to figure out what to do about them. Usually I try and offer something, since I feel that with over twenty years of watching wrestling, I have something to offer.
In this case I do have something to offer. What is the problem you ask? The WWE is struggling. They don't know what to do, and they feel they have been falling in the ratings for years. As I've said in the past, moving from the USA Network, having no competition, and misusing wrestlers have all been problems in the past. They are still problems, and with the exception of misusing wrestlers there isn't much they can do about them. They have to look at the whole problem in another light.
How do you get the WWE more attention right now? Well take a look around? What does the sporting world have to offer right now? The Super Bowl is coming up, and then after that you don't have much of anything until March Madness. After that baseball season starts and the NBA starts shuffling for playoffs spots. Oh yeah hockey does something around then too, but has anybody watched hockey in like the last two years?
The WWE could take advantage of this prime real estate. They have to deal with the Winter Olympics and things like that, but overall it is a well known fact that between the Super Bowl and Opening Day Baseball is a dead area for big sports fans.
Now I'm not saying that all sports fans are wrestling fans, but when you have sports fans reduced to watching golf and chess, I'm sure they would be willing to tune in to more wrestling.
That's right, I am suggesting more wrestling. RAW has Monday nights for now, and they should take full advantage of it. After football, expand to two and a half hours. Three if they can pull it off, but at least two and a half. Smackdown is okay on Thursday, but each show should start up another show on other days. RAW should have something and Smackdown should have something, and they should both be about an hour and a half long. They could use wrestlers (like on Velocity) they don't use much, create and expand more storylines, and at least have something on for wrestling fans during the week.
They could have wrestling on six days a week. I mean each brand has two shows and I would turn Velocity into something of a week long recap for both shows. I would combine Confidential and Velocity, and intermix the highlights and the behind the scenes stuff. I'm not a big fan of the behind the scenes stuff, but it doesn't look like it's going anywhere so combine the two of them.
Now why did I say six days a week? You have two RAW shows, two Smackdown shows, and a Velocity/Confidential show. You put RAW on Monday and Friday, Smackdown on Tuesday and Thursday and then have the Velocity/Confidential on Saturday but I would move it up to right before SNL and maybe have it as a lead-in of sorts, even though it's on a different network. There you have five days.
Why six? What to do on Sunday? Hmmm, no Football, maybe you can watch Soccer from Europe, or you can always watch the dog show. I don't think so. What you do is run a different type of wrestling program on Sundays until Baseball starts up. Unless the ratings are high then you keep it going until Football starts.
Vince McMahon now has access to more wrestling than anyone could possibly ever watch. Not to mention his own lengthy library involving the WWE, he now also owns the WCW and ECW library. He could showcase the show of shows and keep it going for some time. He is starting to do the right thing with the DVDs, both the Ric Flair and Mick Foley DVDs, but he could also do that with television. They could have a Best of program covering the WWE's past, along with focusing on current WWE stars and their past with other companies.
Every Sunday they could put on a two hour program with themes like the best RAW matches, best Smackdown matches, best Ladder Matches, best of Wrestlemania, best debuts, best last matches, all kinds of things.
People could watch and remember the past, and the WWE could slip some things in about stuff going on now with the WWE, keep fans in touch with now, and have a blast from the past for older fans. The fans could get fuzzy memories and maybe the WWE could point out the positive stuff about what they're doing now. They may pull some people in, but if nothing else they would keep a lot of sports fans entertained during the dark days of the sporting year.
Lastly, the WWE needs to keep releasing the DVDs the way they released the last two. Ric Flair's career did not just begin in the WWE, and the same for Mick Foley (although what does it say when McMahon thinks a character is sleezy like Catus Jack?). They span the career of the person and hit some highlights and key matches from their career. Oddly enough, I think they did the Foley DVD a lot better than the Flair set. It was mostly matches and Foley commentating on them. Flair's was a bunch of different stuff. Two minor things though. First, they need to be put in chronological order from now on. The other thing I would like to see is behind the scenes stuff like what other wrestlers (including the Undertaker) thought about the Hell in the Cell match, or how Flair and Piper were really road buddies and enjoyed working with each other. They need other people talking about those wrestlers and how they worked with them, also what worked and what didn't. What wrestlers worked well with Flair and Foley and which ones didn't. Also why they worked or didn't work well, and things like that. I think those things would be interesting and add more to the DVD. More matches (like Foley-who will replace Flair on the sellout DVD list) and behind the scenes stuff.
Well, that about wraps it up from this end. So until I end up with Elisha Cuthbert spending a grueling 24 with me....keep reading...sincerely the Novak Notebook.
Is around the corner, and the WWE is suddenly taking notice. Over the last few weeks they started putting together the matches, and despite the haste, the card is actually shaping up to be a pretty interesting card. Some of the matches, to be fair, have been in the works for some time (Undertaker v Kane, Goldberg v Lesnar, Jericho v Christian) but I do have one question for everyone. Is any of this striking you as must watch TV? I mean they are putting together some pretty solid matches, but are any of them of the caliber that you just can't miss them? The only one that is now piquing interest is the just put together handicap match between Evolution and Mankind and Rock. HHH v Michaels v Benoit is going to be interesting just to see if Benoit gets it and he pins HHH to get it. My prediction is that if Benoit wins, he will not pin HHH to do it, and HHH will certainly not tap.
Jericho goes from king of the world to mid-card in Wrestlemania. This guy has had more ups and downs in this company than their stock. He was one of their more entertaining performers and a solid performer in the ring, yet he doesn't go any higher because he got squashed a few years ago by HHH and has been kept there ever since.
Guerrero winning the title, and Benoit going for the title now makes getting the Radicalz way back when a good idea. Even though Saturn bombed and Malenko retired, the other two were the ones McMahon was really shooting for anyway, and now they are reaching their potential. It is good to see them finally get their shot at the big time, and maybe the WWE is realizing that they can't rely on guys like HHH, Austin, Rock, Hogan, Hart and Michaels forever. They need new people to come in and try and hold the title. Quick trivia, who did the Radicalz turn on when they came to the WWF?
Even though the Undertaker is fighting Kane yet again, the WWE has managed to do the unthinkable. They made this 6 year feud fresh and viable once again. It is interesting, and I can't wait to see the Deadman return one more time. Even though the Undertaker isn't the same he was ten years ago, he still has the presence and can pull off a move here and there to get the job done.
Now the WWE is bringing back the Hall of Fame and inducting everyone and Pete Rose into it. My question is does anyone care and does anyone know who is already in the Hall of Fame besides Gorilla Monsoon and Andre the Giant? It is a stupid Hall of Fame, and nobody really cares.
A few things off the top of my head, and some relate to wrestling and some may not, but it's my column so don't care.
American Idol came out with the bad and ridiculous people who actually thought they could sing. They went on American Idol and made a fool of themselves in front of the whole world. Now some just wanted to try it, which is fine, but I really feel sorry for these people who actually thought they could sing. I KNOW I can't sing, and I would never try out for some of those shows, thinking I had a shot. Anyway, the point is they have a guy who went on there named William Hung who can't sing but people love him anyway. People flock to him and girls (?) love him. Ladies and gentlemen, he is the Gillberg of the American idol scene.
And now to wrap things up, a quick where are they now for some of your favorite wrestlers.......
Lex Luger....he decided to try out for baseball before they test everyone for steroids. He needed something to do and he figured if Jose Canseco can come back, he could certainly try out. Plus, be honest, wouldn't you love to see him clothesline some second baseman trying to break up a double play.
Zack Gowen.....went on a self discovery program to see what does happen to a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest. I heard he got a grant around $50,000 to find out.
Sting.....well, he suddenly woke up and realized that unless you're a wrestler stuck in the 80s, or a rock band from the 70s, people don't wear face paint anymore. He went to wipe it off, and there was nothing left. He wiped his face off!!!!! Those weren't all just little Stinger masks (sidebar; Heather is just going to hate this one!)
Ultimate Warrior....ran down to the end of his driveway to get to get his mail, and his chest exploded. His brain was so steroid driven, that he walked back to the house and fell through the trap door in his floor, never to be seen again.
Ric Flair.....didn't he retire yet? Thought that plane wreck from the 70s cost him his career??
Tony Schiovone (spelling?)......went back to announcing baseball games, until they realized he was a weenie there too, and used him as a fungo bat. And it wasn't an accident.
Terry Funk....got arrested after getting a senior citizens discount at an Old Country Buffet, but wrapping himself in barbed wire and biting everyone who beat him to the buffet.
Sabu....not sure, but I'm certain Duct tape is involved somehow.
Jeff Hardy....Got hired by Glidden after falling into a vat of their paint, causing a new color to be created. "Everything Under the sun....and more...." brand will be on sale soon.
Steve Corino.....he got fired from his last wrestling job, and decided to put all of his blood spilling skills to use. He got hired as a crash test dummy.
Sandman....he's......still....trying....to.....get.....to ....the ring......while....his entrance.....music....is still....playing.
Tommy Dreamer.....went home to ponder what went wrong with Beulah....I mean, I can't see letting someone who looked like that go.....
Bruno Sammartino....still doesn't know what year it is, and I hear a rumor that he speeds up as he passes graveyards because two guys always come out and chase him with shovels.
Chyna.....she is anxiously awaiting the arrival of Torrie Wilson so they can start the "former Playboy covergirls, but nobody cares anymore" tag team.
Anyway, that wraps up another edition of the Novak Notebook.....so until Ralph Nader screws up this election (although I did vote for him last time)...keep reading
Over the years with HHH, and I have expressed them at this site and others before this. Now it is time to give the devil his due. HHH not only dropped the title to someone other than one of his buds (namely Shawn Michaels), but he gave up.
HHH has said on a number of occasions that he would die before he gave up his title. He built it up as more important than breathing. It meant his life, and he would do anything to keep it. He has done anything to keep it on a number of occasions, and unless my memory is wrong, this is the first time he has ever submitted during a title match.
I have said a number of times that HHH is noted for playing backstage politics and throws his weight around worse than anyone. He has held onto the title quite a number of times, which isn't unusual. However, considering he is usually a heel holding onto the title for long periods of time, well that is unusual. Many have wondered why the WWE has lost viewership, and although it wouldn't be fair to place the entire blame on HHH, he is certainly a contributing factor.
As a heel, he has held on to the title longer than most faces that gain the title. He has completely squashed big stars such as Chris Jericho and Mick Foley in their feuds. And through no fault of his own, he just doesn't have the IT factor that other men such as Austin, Rock, and Hogan who did manage to carry the company. HHH is a very solid wrestler and a perfect foil to someone, but he's only as good as the person he's going against. He doesn't have the ability to lift anyone to an amazing performance the way Benoit and Michaels can. He's great as the antagonist, but his character gets rather boring when he is thrust into the main light night after night.
But at the biggest event of the year, Wrestlemania, HHH did something I never thought he would do; He dropped the title. He lost the belt to Chris Benoit, and he not only lost cleanly, but he tapped out. It was a wonderful moment, and hopefully coupled with Eddie Guerrero's recent title victory, this will mark a huge turing point for the WWE.
Benoit will be a great champion for some time. Whether he turns into a guy who can last long term is another question. He doesn't have mic skills to get the crowd wound up, so he will be limited. But I think he will put many people over and make lots of mediocre wrestlers look good, while building toward another HHH feud. He deserved his shot at a title run after making many other wrestlers look good for so long. Here's hoping it's a long successful run.
I honestly never thought HHH would drop the title at Wrestlemania. I am still having a hard time believing it. The only way I thought HHH would lose would be if either Benoit or Michaels pinned each other. I thought he wouldn't lose any of his steam, while maintaining the notion that he never truly lost the title. He would still be able to stake a claim, but maybe others in the front office thought the way I did in that it would cheapen the title if that happened. Maybe McMahon wanted to show that he wasn't going to play favorites even with his new son-in-law, and losing the title was in the best interest of the company.
I'm not sure about this whole lottery thing. I will have to wait and see how this pans out before I make a judgement though. The last lottery started off slow, but did manage to make a few stars such as John Cena whereas they might have gotten pushed to the background otherwise. They definitely need a shake-up considering they lost both Brock and Goldberg, but maybe McMahon is sincere in saying things are going to change.
I like Eric Bishoff, although he's been pushed to the background lately, and Paul Heyman. I think they are good for each show, and since we don't have managers anymore, they kind of act in that capacity.
All I could keep thinking Monday night was how much they paid Molly Holly for shaving her head bald. Here's hoping that she doesn't take the Kurt Angle route and keep it shaved. For all of her talent and skill, she has been shown very little respect since she stopped being the cousin of the Hollys. She has talent and skill, but I'm wondering why she has never gotten more respect. I'm not talking about pushes (some feel she doesn't have the charisma for that, which is fine)....but plain old respect. First they turned her into a prude, then commented on her fat ass (which it isn't, from what I've seen), stripped her down to Granny panties numerous times, and now they shave her head bald.
Who has Chris Jericho pissed off? Losing to Christian at Wrestlemania? I mean, no knock on Christian, but we're talking about the first undisputed heavyweight champ, losing to a midcarder, with help from Trish Stratus. I was actually hoping they would keep them together, to kind of update the Savage-Miss Elizabeth storyline. It would've been nice and cute, but they turned it around. Now this might turn out to be more interesting in the long run, and we'll have to wait and see about that, but I'm not holding my breath anytime soon.
Some sidenotes from the Notebook this week. This is a great weekend to go to the movies. First if you haven't seen the Passion of the Christ, it's spell-binding movie. Next, three new movies have come out that are very good. Taking Lives with Angelina Jolie is a solid thriller, and then there's Dawn of the Dead which updates the whole zombie thing. Not too scary but a very good movie. Lastly, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a wonderful movie. It's being called a great romance, but I don't know what it qualifies as. It was made by the same people who did Being John Malkovich, and it is in the same vein. A wonderful movie from a surprisingly restrained Jim Carrey. And any movie that offers Kirsten Dunst dancing around a bed in a flimsy top and underwear is something worth watching. Seriously a great pic, and well worth the time.
That's about it for now....hope you enjoyed the show. So, until I can get Kirsten Dunst, Elisha Cuthbert, or Kiera Knightley to dance in their underwear on my bed.....keep reading....
Have anything specific to talk about, surprisingly enough, so I decided to discuss many different topics involving a wide array of things.
Chris Jericho is doing well with his latest storyline, and like always he is eliciting a strong reaction with the crowd. They love him and he is playing to the crowd to a t, but the WWE is still keeping him at midcard level. I'm not sure whether or not they are trying to elevate Christian or happy with keeping Jericho mid level, but it is confusing to say the least.
HHH does it again. First he dropped the title to Benoit by tapping out and now he is feuding with Sheldon Benjamin. Wonderful, perfect and is a great angle. I love it and think it's a great idea. HHH is showing that he is willing to play along and maybe finally he realizes that others have to move up in order for his matches to mean something. If HHH keeps facing the same people, fans get bored. The WWE needs new blood near the top, and it looks like the men at the top are willing to make the room.
Undertaker is back and the WWE is using him wisely. He doesn't have the stamina he did ten years ago, so he can't maintain the style he once had. He has had many injuries during his career, and so having him wrestle as much as he used to is going to use him up rather quickly. Pacing him and having him pop up here and there is the best way to do it.
I personally think the WWE is doing quite well. They have new champs at the top and it looks like some exciting ones coming through the ranks as well. They are trying to change things up and even if they aren't always successful, I give them a lot of credit for trying.
Brock Lesnar. Goldberg. Ultimate Warrior. Gail Kim. What do these names have in common? Three of them no longer wrestle and the other barely wrestles. The three men shot to the top of the ranks rather quickly and the wrestling world was going to revolve around them. They were the next Ric Flair or Hulk Hogan. They were going to be at the top for the next ten years, and have matches as classic as the ones like Andre v Hogan and Flair v Race. Kim was given the women's title on her very first match. Her first match!!! Where is there to go from there? Way, way down.
The question is what happened on the way to the podium? What happened to these three men and what happened to the future of wrestling? These three are gone and what's left? Hmmm, let's look around. Benoit (19 years in the business)....Guerrero (his life and family in the business)......HHH (ten plus years in the business)....Van Damm (10 or so years).....Jericho (8 or so years)......and do we even need to mention the Undertaker? I mean some of these guys are obviously not the future of wrestling, but they have lasted a lot longer than any of the other three combined. The question is why? Well, the answer might be too much too soon. I mean when you propel someone to the top they have nowhere to go but down. The guys who put in years and years, and then win the title like a Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, Eddie Guerrero or Chris Benoit appreciate the business and appreciate the title alot more than any of the others that had it handed to them. I mean who was Goldberg or Lesnar before they were in the WWE? Goldberg was a has been football player who wasn't all that great when he did play and Lesnar was an amateur wrestler. He was good at that, but not much else. Now they think they're something they're not.......they grew too big for their bitches. They think they're Gods gift to the wrestling industry because they had everything handed to them and were told they were God's gift so much they believed it. Whereas all the others worked hard, took their losses for years, won lesser titles and finally won the big one. It means so much more when it is won by someone who deserves it.
Was at Time's Square......saw where the World was at, and it still advertises WWE events. btw: Times Square is the wildest place I've seen.
Trish Stratus as a bad girl? Hmmm, should be interesting. So far it's going well, we'll see what happens when the Jericho angle runs it's course though.
I always liked the World's Greatest Tag Team (although they needed another name) so I'm hoping that the WWE does right by Charlie Haas since it has seen it to do right by Sheldon Benjamin.
Dudley Boys either need Stacy Kiebler back or they need a turn to a really evil side. They need to go around and kick asses again, and use any means necessary.
Hmmm, Elisha Cuthbert as a former porn star in her new movie the girl next door. Gets one drooling just thinking about it doesn't it?
The Whole Ten Yards??? Cute name but why did we need the movie?
Is the war over yet? I mean guys are still dying over there and we still have problems...haven't found an ounce of nuclear material that would remotely qualify as a weapon of mass destruction and yet we still have men over there getting killed. Can anyone say Vietnam, because this is starting to look a lot like that.
Happy birthday Roddy Piper. You had a great career.....and hopefully the movie career will kick back in.
Happy trails Rock......you movie did okay, but it looks like it's fading fast......so what does that mean for the Rock? A future on made-for-television movies??
Where is George the Animal Steele when you need him? Having William Regal manage a retarded relative of Eric Bishoff might play for a few laughs, but it's going to get old real quick.
We will tackle many issues not involved with wrestling. While I still watch and enjoy wrestling, there are many things that still are happening around the world that need to be addressed. This is the issue in which we will address these things. Feel free to disagree with any comments I make, after all everyone is allowed to be wrong once in awhile.
Okay, John Stevens is finally thrown off of American Idol. I have never seen so many people get ticked off over something so stupid. I watch the show, and I am hooked. I still don't know how it happened, but frankly it was interesting to talk about who was going to stay and who was going to go. Some people were getting downright ugly over it. First, this kid is 16 years old and to rip him up and down like some critics were doing is just silly. How many of them were singing in front of millions and millions of people at the age of 16? I doubt very many of them sing, let alone in front of a huge television audience.
I did not think this kid was a great singer, but I was starting to feel sorry for him. People were actually crying race? How many white singers are left in the competition? How many black singers are left in the competition? Doesn't look like racism to me. By the way, who won last year? Race is an issue........sometimes. The problem is when someone doesn't get their way, they cry race and that just isn't right. Race isn't always an issue. By crying race all the time, you actually desensitize people to the times when it actually is a legitimate issue. Something as silly as American Idol, and even mentioning race as an issue is just a stupid thing. Girls liked the guys like John Peter Lewis and John Stevens, and they voted for them. Who knows, maybe with some grooming and five or six more years Stevens may be the next Harry Connick Jr. Maybe not, but to play the race card and rip this kid in every way possible is more wrong than him getting through to the next round.
Pat Tillman is a true hero and someone young kids should look up to. Guys like Eli Manning and Kellen Winslow Jr. are the new "stars" on the block in the NFL. It is sad that on a day when Tillman was honored, you had the new kids crying and whining about the contracts and teams they were ending up with. So wrong. Here is a man who gave up money and a profession he held so dear, yet gave it up fight for his country. A true hero was tarnished by the spoiled brat antics of the new kids on the block.
Whether you agree or disagree with the war, the one thing you should never ever do is confuse the war with the people fighting over in the war. This happened in Vietnam, when people who came back were treated nearly as criminals instead of people who had put their lives on the line so we are able to trash talk the government. In many other countries this type of column, or anything that had been a negative view on the government actions would lead to prosecution if not out and out execution. These people go into battle, and risk their lives every time they go somewhere. We should honor their memories if they have given up their lives, and if you meet someone who is a vet, maybe just walk up and say thank you for everything you've done.
Am I the only one who realizes how much the rest of the world hates us? I mean, think about everything we've done as a nation lately. We wanted a war and the UN said show us something and we'll go along with you. We couldn't show them any reason to go to war, and they couldn't in good conscious support us. We start a war anyway, going around the UN, and look stupid doing it. We don't find any weapons of mass destruction, which we told the world we knew they have, and now have to back peddle on everything we said. Now we turn around and ask the UN for help in restoring a new government in Iraq? Are you kidding me? We spit in their face and then ask them for a dollar? They're probably still laughing at us over that. I am so frustrated over this whole thing, because essentially we started a war with a nation who wasn't doing anything all because our leader didn't like their leader. We can't go back now, so the real question is what to do from here? Maybe a new start?
Just thinking about it the other day when they were talking about Friends ending and Frasier coming to an end as well. In my lifetime, some of the best TV shows ever have come and gone. MASH, All in the Family, Cheers, Hill Street Blues, Seinfeld, Married...with Children, and of course Mr. Roger's Neighborhood. Probably many more than I mentioned, and some sentimental favorites that I certainly left out, but it's just a shame that I watch more ESPN than anything on regular television.
On that note, isn't it time to get rid of most of these reality tv shows? I mean let's get real for a minute here. Once you stick a camera in front of someone's face, it isn't real tv anymore. And why are we seeing Jessica Simpson, Carmen Elektra, and the Osbournes? The Osbournes were funny originally, because they are so strange, but that got old. Reality TV is probably here to stay, simply because it's cheaper than regular shows and they don't have to think about it as much. In case you haven't looked lately, tv has gotten much dumber as of late, because talented writers don't do television anymore. They aren't willing to stick with shows and wait for them to build followings, so writers get out quick, if they go in at all. They work on Broadway, or other areas.
Speaking of entertainment, exactly what is the radio for? Why is it when I turn on a radio station, I either hear fifty songs in a row that I could care less about, or the same twelve songs all day? Again, ESPN radio saves me from not having to rip the tuner out of my car.
The new nickel is out. There will be another new one later this year, and supposedly two new more next year. Also looking to change the dime, maybe get rid of the penny, and more changes to the paper money.
Murder for hire in hockey, Kobe Bryant in basketball, steroids in baseball. Doesn't anyone remember when we used to escape the news by watching sports?
By the way...thumbs up to Phil Mickelson. Way to go to get that gorilla off your back.
Hmmm, let me get this straight. Parents whine about their kids because they don't listen. Kids whine about their parents and adults because they aren't listened to. Kids can divorce their parents and even sue them. Parents discipline kids and have Child Services called on them. Teachers can't control kids anymore. Kids don't learn in school anymore. USA kids constantly end up near the bottom of all kinds of world wide tests. Teacher tries to discipline kid, parents called, teacher apologizes and gets fired. School gets sued. Teacher becomes glorified babysitters. Kids learn if they want to. What does all of this tell us? Kids are in charge of everything?? And people wonder why we're in some of the messes we're in?
Why are we so fascinated by celebrities who really don't do anything? Why do more people know who Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie are than Steven Hawking or Ruth Ginsberg? Does it really matter that Posh Spice got cheated on by David Beckham, yet very few bat an eye when a train full of people blows up? Something is wrong with that.
I personally like Jessica Simpson more than Britney Spears or Christina Aguilera. Even though Britney is gorgeous and Christina is from my home town, Jessica is kind of carving an interesting career path for herself. The way she is heading, she could become the next Goldie Hawn. Portraying a dumb blonde to perfection helped launch Goldie's career, and it has definitely gotten Jessica noticed.
Now for some other stuff...tidbits and recommendations.
The new Divas magazine came out, along with the new DVD. Bought the magazine, but I'm skipping the DVD unless I get it cheaped. The pictures are always worth looking at and you can never have enough Trish, Stacy, and Torrie. But the DVD is $20 and it's pretty much the same thing every year. They pose, tell you how wonderful the area is they went to shoot, and show some of their silly side. It's nice at first, but gets boring quick.
Do we really need Eugene around? I mean, I guess William Regal needs something to do, but why couldn't they put him in charge of someone like the Bushwackers or the Bashams, which would be a complete contrast to what he is. It would still be funny, and he does have the greatest reactions in the business, but Eugene? C'Mon!!! If George the Animal isn't available, then don't try to copy him. We just got over Zach Gowen, we don't need RainMan.
Where the hell did everyone on Smackdown go? I mean it's like Eddie Guerrero doesn't have anyone to wrestle, so they have to reinvent Bradshaw. This isn't looking very good at all.
Raw is looking very solid, even without Stone Cold. I don't miss him right now, but sure enough as soon as there is a slump, everyone is going to be saying how they miss Stone Cold. What the WWE needs to do right now (which they seem to be doing) is developing new stars. Having Benoit, Guerrero, Sheldon, and Orton propelled to the top is a good start. Have to wait and see how it works.
And finally, believe it or not I'm actually going to defend the WWE a little bit. After everyone was pressing them to admit they were fake, and they made the mistake of caving in, along with the slew of shows that displayed behind the scenes of professional wrestling, and the movie Beyond the Mat, and the name change taking wrestling out of their name, the WWE has been reeling. They don't have competition, and the reality shows that showed behind the scenes of what they were doing are tailing off in interest. They are kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place. Everyone now knows they are fake (which they did before, but at least they had never admitted it, keeping that veil of illusion between them and the fans), and yet showing what they do behind the scenes doesn't hold the interest it once did. What are they to do?
They can't go back, but they need to make small steps. Go back to WWWF, instead of WWE. Get wrestling back into their name. They are already getting rid of Confidential, but that's too late. They can't put that veil of illusion back up, but they now have to promote themselves like a movie. That's why people don't watch with the interest they used to. Why root for someone when they change sides as often as you change socks? They need to make some changes, but it's harder than it is in real sports. In baseball, they went through a slump but McGuire and Sosa brought fans back, along with Cal Ripken. LeBron James catches people's interest in basketball, and Tiger reinvented interest in golf. The stars brought in the fans. Unfortunately, wrestling has to work a little different.
The stars are made by the fans, as Roddy Piper once said. If the fans don't like you, you won't be around long. Rocky Mavia was nearly done when he rebeled against the fans, and all of the sudden he struck a cord with the fans. Stone Cold did the same thing after ditching the ringmaster gimmick. But the WWE is in a bit of a deficit right now. They don't have the stars like Hogan, Piper and Savage to bring in the fans, and they haven't been great at greating new stars the fans are interested in. They've tried, but it becomes harder when you don't have the fans coming in. What the WWE needs to do,which it seems like they're doing, is just keep experimenting with different guys at the top. Keep putting new guys at the top and see who sticks. See who the fans like and who they react against and for, and then move on from there. That's all they can really do, since they've had so many stars leave over the last few years. Foley, Austin, Rock, Hogan, Piper, Goldberg, Lesnar, and a few others have left over the last four or five years, with very few taking their spots at the top. Some of that blame falls on poor planning. Some of it is a rash of critical injuries at bad times. Some of it is backstage politics. All of that together makes it difficult for someone to climb the ladder when the ladder is constantly shifting. Another thing is the rapid build-up to main event status, with a quick fall off to second tier matches. Angle, Jericho and Booker T have been the more recent examples of this type of booking where they get hyped up for the new ppv, then quickly disposed of, only to get mid level matches for a long time. They can't build any momentum by facing people like Val Venis, Goldust or wrestlers like that. If you build them up too slowly, then you don't have much of a ppv. There are only a few wrestlers they have done right lately (most recently, John Cena), and the rush to get the next main event at the next ppv out of the way has stagnated quite a number of careers, while boggling a lot of writer's minds. This is a quandry which doesn't look like it will end any time soon. You would need to build a lot more slowly, which would require less ppv's. Instead, it looks like the WWE is going to actually add a few ppvs for the summer, which is going to make it even tougher to get to the top and stay there. Think about the past stars and what made them stars. It wasn't because they were always on top (after all, Piper did face Bad News Brown at a Wrestlemania), but they stayed near the top for so long that even when they dipped a little lower, no one thought anything of it. This needs to be done again if these stars are going to actually stack up against the stars of yesterday.
Well, that's it for now. So until Stacy Kiebler comes to my place and makes a video with me...
The Novak Notebook will look at several different things, and this time there might even be talk about some wrestling.
First and foremost as I was doing laundry and eating dinner at the same time (it isn't as hard as it sounds if you're putting stuff in the dryer for over an hour) I was sitting there thinking about things that have adversively affected this country over the last century. Now, I'm not talking about wars or things like that, but inventions and incidences that have changed this country for the worse. So, I'm going to list a few, in no particular order, and explain myself for each one.
1. Fast food restaurants......I don't think this needs much explaining, but here it goes. This country has gotten fat (myself included). We have places to eat where you grab a super sized french fries and suddenly you're not allowed to eat the rest of the day. This is never a good thing.
2. Video games.....this is coming from a closet video game junkie, but I don't think this was the best invention in the world. They are entertaining and they provide great hand eye coordination, however in the long run they isolate kids from the rest of the world, which creates problems when they go out and try and communicate with the rest of the world. They just don't have the social skills they would if they were outside doing something. Also doesn't help the weight issue if you sit in front of a television all day.
3. Fashion and model magazines.....These have just ruined society. Every man wants a girl who looks like that, and every women is supposed to look like that, otherwise there is something wrong with them. This has made it hard on women and made it difficult for any of them to look like anything other than super models. Most of the world doesn't look like that (hell most of the models don't look like that before the air brushing). It has given me fits over the years to see women who look fine the way they are stand there with a straight face and tell me they need to lose weight.
4. Brown v Board of Education.....for those of you who don't know this was the case that outlawed segregation. Now before I get a bunch of hatemail from people who don't even read this let me clarify why this was a bad thing that happened in this country. It wasn't the case itself, but what the case represented. The fact that slaves had been freed for nearly a hundred years by that point didn't matter as they were still being treated as less than equals. It was a sad thing that the need for that case was still needed just a little more than fifty years ago. Hopefully we'll progress much faster in the future.
5. Nixon lying.......this part of history changed the conception of politics forever. When it broke what had happened, coupled with just getting done with Vietnam, the public needed something hopeful to look forward to, and Nixon was looking like he was getting the country out of Vietnam, yet get the country important ties with places like China. Then when he started gaining momentum toward a second term, he got paranoid and bugged the Democratic offices in the Watergate hotel. He came out and said he didn't do it while he was trying to cover it up behind the scenes. He wasn't the first President to lie, nor was he the last. But his lie and resignation changed the face of politics for the worse in this country forever.
6.English teachers who wanted to be authors....I don't have a problem with a good debate. Believe me when I tell you that. But what I have a problem with are English teachers who think they are the most important thing in the world, and their opinion about a book is the only thing that matters. Unless they were the author of the book or married to the author or interviewed the author about the book, their opinion is just that; an opinion. If I've read the book and they've read the book then my opinion is just as important as theirs. Just because they may have read about the book doesn't mean they know exactly what the author is trying to convey. My uncle is an author and he said that if authors put as much thought into the story as teacher's give them, they would never get past the first chapter. Most of these stories were written during a period of time when most of the population was illiterate and quite a number of people didn't go to college. How ironic that we study them there huh?
7. The hot coffee lawsuit....let me get this straight, if I can. A woman buys a cup of coffee, places it between her legs in her car, getting ready to drive off. It spills and gives her a lot of burns. She then receives three millions dollars in a lawsuit, which I believe was later reduced to a million and a half, because she said the coffee was too hot. Whaaaat? Lady, you bought coffee, not iced tea. It's supposed to be hot. And unless you're a hooker or a leg model (which she was like a hundred years old, so I don't think so) you don't make money with your legs, so why do you feel you deserve that much money. But in this country, she won which set a precedent for all stupid and needless lawsuits to come, forever clogging up the legal system forever more.
8. CGI in movies (namely Independence Day).....why is this on here when I am a fan of the big action movies? Good question. Let me ask you a question hotshot. How many good action movies are there that come out every year? Maybe a few. But most movies like that don't have a plot to save their life. Independence Day was the first big budget CGI movie with a mindless plot that I can think of right off the top of my head. CGI completely took creative writing out of most major movies, instead replacing it with mind numbing effects. There are exceptions to this rule mind you, but for every Matrix there are a hundred Godzillas. Instead of relying on chemistry, plot and caring about the characters, we have gotten to the point in movies where the bigger explosion wins the battle. Some are truly great and spectacular (I love the battle scenes in Troy, and Day After Tomorrow looks amazing), but some look overblown (Bad Boys II is a great example, and Chronicles of Riddick could be another. Remember Pitch Black? It was a nice low budget sleeper hit). I understand some of it is needed for movies like Jurassic Park or Spider Man 2, but not for everything. It eventually just dulls the senses unless there is something more to it.
9. All you can eat buffets......see fast food resaurants up above.
10. Last but not least absentee parenting......now, let me first say that I'm not a parent and I don't speak from experience, but from what I've seen around a good number of parents nowadays do not want to take responsibility for the kids they have. They don't even want to be bothered with them sometimes. I understand that some latch key kid situations are unavoidable, however leaving your kids watching Beavis and Butthead while you're doing something else in another room is ridiculous. Then you bitch and whine when your kid burns down the house because he saw them do it on television. Instead of saying you screwed up as a parent by not watching them, watching what they were viewing on television, and making sure they didn't get their hands on matches, it is much easier to blame someone else. That is the big problem in this country. Everyone is a victim. Nobody can take responsibility for what they did. It was their parents fault, or society's fault, or someone else. That is utter nonsense. Just plain ridiculous. Unless someone has a gun pointed at your head, or you are crazy, you are reponsible for what you do. I understand about addictions, but people have managed to overcome them in years gone by. It isn't easy, but I guess it's easier to blame McDonalds for making you fat rather than you eating there five times a week. Give me a break. This started with parents not wanting anything to do with disciplining their kids (now there are so many stupid laws out there, the kids can't be disciplined by anyone) and now everyone is out there claiming they are a victim. Soon, those kids who were someone elses problem are going to be growing up and running things, and they are going to be a problem for us when we get older. This country has got to get back on track with that and soon enough.......or else.
Now to some wrestling......my top ten list in the world of wrestling....the good the bad and everything else.......
10. Two ppvs a month in October for RAW??? Now what has been my main beef over the years with wrestling? Too many ppvs, and now they decide to add a few more. That makes a whole lot of sense. PPVs have been a problem and here's why. It isn't the fact that I want to see them give away great matches for free on regular television. I want to see them built really well for awhile, but I don't mind if they don't give them away. What I do mind is all of the crap that manages to make it to a ppv that years ago would've ended up on a Saturday night somewhere. There are too many feuds that would be very interesting on regular television but that aren't good enough people should be paying to see how they fall out.
9. NWA on television.......that is great. Fox Sports is getting into the wrestling business and NWA is getting on air. Now for the bad news......3 o'clock on Friday afternoons? What were they thinking?? I have this little thing called work that I do from time to time. I don't know if I can skip out an hour and a half every Friday afternoon to come back and watch wrestling. If you're going to put it on at least put it on either in the evening or weekend afternoon.
8. Has anyone noticed something about the major titles in the WWE right now? Most have been held for a good period of time right now. Think about it..... John Cena (US Title) Eddie Guerrero (WWE Title) Randy Orton (Intercontinental Title) and Chris Benoit (World Title) have all held the belt for well over a month....most of them a lot longer. I think the WWE finally realized they needed to have their champions last longer, otherwise the titles would truly mean nothing. These four men have brought meaning back to each of those titles.
7. Why am I more excited about getting a Harley Race autograph from a pack of NWA cards than I was getting a Sparky Anderson autograph from a pack of baseball cards? Don't know, but when I saw old Harley's signature on that card, that was a sure pretty sight.
6. Okay....Eugene is growing on me. I admit it. So there. I wish Stacy Kiebler would be growing on me somewhere right now though.
5. How long before Brock Lesnar comes back to the WWE? Is anyone going to place any wagers on this? I'm going to say eight months, because look at it this way. Most former football players come to wrestle, not the other way around. And think about most of the football players that come in to wrestle....they weren't that great. Mongo and Big Cat Ladd are probably the two best that every were on pro teams, and yet neither was ever the best player on their team. Makes you wonder how long before Brock will be whining his way back to the WWE.
4. Where have all the managers gone? I think the WWE is missing something with this. They have a lot of talented wrestlers right now that can't get over. Most of them aren't that great with the mic, so the fans don't care about them. Why can't they bring back the managers? I realize a few years ago they were going with cliques (DX, Nation of Domination, etc.) and the need for managers disappeared. But now they need them again, and it is the quickest way to get someone over. Think about Cowboy Bob, Mr. Wonderful, and Hercules. Would they have been nearly as well known if not for managers. You get booed quick, and when you turn on the manager you become an instant fan favorite. It is easy, and it is something that has proven to work. They can use the Divas that are sitting around and use a few of them (give Stacy and Torrie stables and they will get cheered, just ask the Dudleys)....then have some other guys like Coach who is good on a mic come up with a stable, and then you have something to work with. I think they could do so much by bringing back the managers.
3. Nathan Jones lasted about ten seconds against Brad Pitt in Troy. Kevin Nash lasted quite a bit longer against Thomas Jane in the Punisher. It's nice to know that these guys have a career of dropping dead quickly (much like they did in their wrestling days) in movies now that their wrestling days are over.
2. Okay....I want everyone to think real hard for a minute about the great style of match invented over the last ten years. There are a lot to choose from so think hard....okay, time's up. This was a fun one to think about, because you have the whole ECW experience, ladder matches, iron man matches and the whole thing. But if I had to choose, I would say the Hell in the Cell matches have been consistently the best over the years. We had the one with the Big Boss Man, but if you throw that one out, each of the others was exciting, and yet they were all a little different. From the first one between Michaels and the Undertaker through the the last few....they have all been a lot of fun to watch.
1. I don't know if this is good or not but the Eddie Guerrero story is coming up soon. Now as many of you know, I'm not the biggest fan of when wrestling pulls back the curtain, and this is no different. While on some levels I applaud Eddie coming out and telling his story, on other levels this smacks of another celebrity out of control and apologizing story. How many have we heard over the years? I swear at one point I thought all of Hollywood had a cocaine problem they had just kicked. I mean when Drew Barrymore comes out and tells us she was drinking and doing drugs at eleven (not to mention what else), why should it surprise us that a wrestler is going through the same things? It's sad, and I am very happy for Eddie that he is cleaned up and moving on, but we all take life one day at a time, as we all should. I guess if you need inspiration then these stories appeal to you, but they never worked for me because I usually can't relate to the people telling them. It doesn't mean I don't sympathize with them because I understand that celebrities have problems just like the rest of us, and they have to overcome them the same as we do too. We just don't all do it on $300,000+ a year to try and get over our problems. I understand money isn't everything, but let's be honest here. If Robert Downey Jr. or Daryl Strawberry or most of the people in Hollywood who have confessed to doing a ton of drugs were normal people, they would be locked away for a long long time. So, while they still may have some problems that an ordinary person faces, being a celebrity certainly does have its advantages. I don't feel sorry for any of them, although I like the story when the person overcomes their demons, because it makes a good human interest story and who doesn't want to see someone overcome their problems. However, with the money that's involved and the lifestyles these people lead, I can never really relate to what they're going through, so I don't know what them telling me their story is going to accomplish exactly. Chances are good I'll never be in their position, and chances are better they aren't in mine. So my basic question is what is the point? Who are you helping by telling your story? Other celebrities?
Well, that about wraps up another edition of the Novak Notebook...so until I can walk into Burger King and order a double Chavo Classic with Cheese (what is it with this...first Lawler now Chavo Sr?)....keep reading, sincerely the Novak Notebook.
has explored many areas over the past several months, and in case anyone is wondering, yes the columns are getting further apart at times. Unfortunately, there just isn't as much to write about right now, and since I've pretty much criticized the hell out of the WWE, what else is there to say? I mean, I've given my suggestions, and offered my opnions, however to be fair, I have never run a business let alone a billion dollar company.
1. First, I have never watched the Jarrett run programs. TNA hopefully will do well, and eventually be a solid second place contender, and if nothing else, will give wrestlers another place to go. It broadens the horizon and doesn't allow the WWE to have a monopoly on wrestling. Let's all route for the TNA wrestlers and hope they get it right.
Now on to other matters. I thought about this awhile, and ironically while reading a book called the "Republican Noise Machine" it hit me. Even though the wrestlers get out there somewhat and mingle with the fans, they really don't have a lot of contact with the fans, other than what they do at the arenas. They are pretty much the same as other sports, in that they may give someone a high five while entering the ring, or celebrate with the fans after a victory. They even respond to the taunts and praise of the fans while they talk. But most other sports do that as well. The Lambeau leap, Cal Ripken high fiving everyone, and basketball players getting psyched up or out by the fans. It happens everywhere else, but those other sports have done something else to get the fans further involved with their respective sports.
Most of these sports have realized over the years that the fans can no longer relate to the players playing the games. I mean, c'mon, a "blue collar" team in baseball is still earning millions of dollars a year. Minimum wage in baseball is in the vicinity of $300,000 a year! That's the least you can make (unless you're a September call-up). How can fans making ten dollars an hour relate to someone who gets paid hundred thousand a hit? They can't. People running sports teams realized this so they needed to do things to get the fans further involved with the sport.
Rely on the players? Forget that. They are so involved with themselves they have no time for the fans whom they rely on for their paychecks. People understand this, I would hope the players understand this, but they don't care. They have no time for the fans, so teams couldn't rely on players mending bridges with fans. So what else could they do?
Give the fans an All-Star game, where they could vote for the players they wanted to see. This gets the fans excited, and they can maybe see some match-ups they wouldn't normally get a chance to see. Pedro Martinez pitching against Barry Bonds. Seeing Bonds, Sammy Sosa, and Ken Griffey Jr in the same outfield. Three players still playing well, and all of them have over five hundred homers in their careers. Seeing Clemens go back against the teams who he used to face all the time. That is stuff that's great.
It's the same in the other sports as well, although football is a bit different. They seem to be doing well everywhere, and their All-Star game at the end of the season doesn't mean a whole lot. Especially not after the Super Bowl. But other sports have the All-Star games where people can see things and see those match-ups you might never get to see. Even though most All-Star games don't mean a whole lot, there are still some good memories that can come from an All-Star game.
Where is all of this going? I'm glad you asked my fine feathered friend. Wrestling really doesn't do a whole lot to get the fans involved. There is no All-Star ppv for the fans to vote on, barely a few times can vote on different things like favorite matches or stuff like that. Fans can't really do anything to get closer to the wrestlers, and the wrestlers are not really in touch with the fans.
Who wouldn't like to pick matches for a fan type of ppv and then see them played out for everyone to see. It would be really cool, and it would make you feel a little closer to the wrestlers. The wrestlers could comment on what it was like to get chosen for the ppv, and what it meant for them to face the person the fans wanted them to face. Not only that, but McMahon could gauge who is working and who is over with the fans by how the voting goes. It could help tremendously, and it doesn't even have to be a ppv. It could be a Smackdown or a Raw every once in awhile. It think it could help everyone involved.
now some short points from a short man.
Eddie Guerrero is not to blame for the problems on Smackdown. Just the fact that he doesn't have any competition and there isn't anything going on with Smackdown outside of Angle v Cena (aka Austin v McMahon). It is a boring show and there isn't much of a reason to watch.
Raw is a good show and it seems to be getting better. There are wonderful dynamics on the show and there are so many subplots right now, you have to stay glued to the show.
Other news......
Best movie recently; Spider-Man 2 A great movie, probably better than the first. cool villain, and everyone is given a bit juicier part that was in the first one. Dodgeball was probably my guilty pleasure movie for the summer....slapstick funny.
Well, that about wraps it up this time, so until some woman comes along and wraps me in her lasso of truth,
Many areas over the past several months, and in case anyone is wondering, yes the columns are getting further apart at times. Unfortunately, there just isn't as much to write about right now, and since I've pretty much criticized the hell out of the WWE, what else is there to say? I mean, I've given my suggestions, and offered my opnions, however to be fair, I have never run a business let alone a billion dollar company.
First, I have never watched the Jarrett run programs. TNA hopefully will do well, and eventually be a solid second place contender, and if nothing else, will give wrestlers another place to go. It broadens the horizon and doesn't allow the WWE to have a monopoly on wrestling. Let's all route for the TNA wrestlers and hope they get it right.
Now on to other matters. I thought about this awhile, and ironically while reading a book called the "Republican Noise Machine" it hit me. Even though the wrestlers get out there somewhat and mingle with the fans, they really don't have a lot of contact with the fans, other than what they do at the arenas. They are pretty much the same as other sports, in that they may give someone a high five while entering the ring, or celebrate with the fans after a victory. They even respond to the taunts and praise of the fans while they talk. But most other sports do that as well. The Lambeau leap, Cal Ripken high fiving everyone, and basketball players getting psyched up or out by the fans. It happens everywhere else, but those other sports have done something else to get the fans further involved with their respective sports.
Most of these sports have realized over the years that the fans can no longer relate to the players playing the games. I mean, c'mon, a "blue collar" team in baseball is still earning millions of dollars a year. Minimum wage in baseball is in the vicinity of $300,000 a year! That's the least you can make (unless you're a September call-up). How can fans making ten dollars an hour relate to someone who gets paid hundred thousand a hit? They can't. People running sports teams realized this so they needed to do things to get the fans further involved with the sport.
Eddie Guerrero is not to blame for the problems on Smackdown. Just the fact that he doesn't have any competition and there isn't anything going on with Smackdown outside of Angle v Cena (aka Austin v McMahon). It is a boring show and there isn't much of a reason to watch.
Raw is a good show and it seems to be getting better. There are wonderful dynamics on the show and there are so many subplots right now, you have to stay glued to the show.
Other news......
Most interesting book I'm reading; "Republican Noise Machine" by David Brock. Talks about how the Republicans over the past thirty years have manipulated the media to get it the way they want it. Very intriguing so far.
Best movie recently; Spider-Man 2 A great movie, probably better than the first. cool villain, and everyone is given a bit juicier part that was in the first one. Dodgeball was probably my guilty pleasure movie for the summer....slapstick funny.
Guilty pleasure DVD; Wonder Woman season one. Okay, the show wasn't all that great, and it was before special effects really went anywhere, but I had such a crush on Lynda Carter growing up...she looked fantasic in that Wonder Woman outfit, causing grown men everywhere to have dirty thoughts when they were thinking about the Amazon.
Well, that about wraps it up this time, so until some woman comes along and wraps me in her lasso of truth, keep reading....sincerely the Novak Notebook
And how many matches can you name that would be considered for match of the year? Most of the ones I would name probably have Benoit or Angle involved with them somehow. This has been a great year for Benoit, and a good/bad year for Eddie Guerrero. It is amazing what winning the championship does for one man's career and what it does for another.
First and foremost, let's be perfectly honest here. Eddie Guerrero is on a program that's in a lot of trouble. They have lost a few stars and really haven't replaced them in any way. Say what you will about Eric Bishoff being on RAW, but at least he gives RAW a face. Smackdown has had Paul Heyman, Stephanie McMahon, Kurt Angle, and now Theodore Long. I haven't been a fan of Teddy Long's but at least he's been in the business awhile, and he knows how it works. I think he could be a pretty decent general manager, and besides why not use him? They haven't had anyone else work really well as a gm in a long time. They have had too much turnover at the top, and I do think it affects their product, even though it is the same company that owns them. They've lost Brock Lesnar, Show has been out for awhile, and they didn't have a real strong program before those two went out.
Eddie got caught in the middle. He was the champ when the show started to slide, and naturally he gets the heat for it. But the problem has been; who have his opponents been since he faced off against Kurt Angle? Not too many big names to say the least. I mean when you have to promote Bradshaw and give him a face lift to JBL, then your company has problems.
Now, there are some bright spots on Smackdown. John Cena has come into his own, and I will tell you that it is his show to say the least. I like Booker T and especially the way they've thrust him back into a title picture. They still don't know what to do with RVD, but at least they put them out there. The new Bronze Warrior might turn into something, but right now they have a lot of if's and's a buts. Not too many sure things right now.
On the other hand Benoit has been hot, and he is on the clearly better show and was the main event. Although he just lost to Randy Orton, and most likely he will be placed on the back burner somewhat, as long as they keep him sniffing around the title, it will keep things interesting. Benoit had quite a long title run, defeated many of the top names, and had quite a number of clean victories. Teaming him with Eugene was something a little odd, although title holders sometimes do that (Steamboat with the Animal, Hogan with Mr T and Cyndi Lauper, Bret Hart with the Bushwackers) but it didn't tarnish his reign.
He had a great run, and he was part of an idea the WWE finally had. Let's have all of our title holders run with the titles for awhile rather than turning it over every month. I mean, lately unless you name began and ended with an H, as soon as you got a title, you handed it over at the next ppv or two. Benoit has held the title since March. That's nearly as long as I have been in New York. Orton, Guerrero, and Cena also held their belts for an extensive period of time. That was quite an accomplishment for the WWE. Maybe they finally realized that if they didn't care about their belts, the fans wouldn't care either.
I'm glad to hear McMahon is looking into what to do about the WWE and the trouble it is into. At least he is showing concern about the product, but the problem is nobody knows what to do about it. They don't really haven't any answers to the questions that are being asked, but at least the concern and awareness is there. The worst thing in the world would be if McMahon would have the thought that everything is fine and continue down that path. It would surely lead to problems down the road.
I just finished watching the DVD, RAW v Nitro. It started out as the war between the two, but it eventually turned into the demise of Nitro and WCW. The other thing with the video is it didn't go into detail about what McMahon has learned and taken for his own since the demise of Nitro. What is also funny is that McMahon talked about WCW stealing talent and using them, but then McMahon took all of the things WCW created and squashed them. Took Goldberg and turned him into a fool, and he crushed the NWO. Now is he just doing this to feel better about himself, or was he trying to tell his audience that everything they watched over in WCW was stupid and silly?
I liked the DVD, and it went into a lot of depth. I have to give Eric Bishoff props for coming out and admitting that he was an ass as things progressed. McMahon however, still comes off as a victim. I mean some of the things he said about the business practices of the other party make me laugh. He didn't exactly make nice with local promoters in the 1980s, trying to squash as many as he could. He went to rather low tactics himself, and isn't he the one that had Ric Flair bring the WCW belt to the WWF to show up the people over at WCW? I don't exactly feel too sorry for him. If he knew what he was up against, and he didn't do anything about it, that's his problem. The one thing the disc points out rather clearly, is that it was a great time to be a fan, and chances are good we won't see that much in the way of good wrestling programming for years.
We're still hoping for TNA to take off, I hope.
I just started reading the Ric Flair book (it was next on a list after a book about the lies of George Bush- it isn't a short book). I skimmed over some of the chapters, and I must say that of all of the WWE promoted books, this one seems to be the most honest of them all. It by no means paints the WWE in a bad manner at all (why is the WWE like a big frat house in all of these books? Then we turn around and here about all of the backstage politics and backbiting? Kinda makes the books ring hollow doesn't it?), but Flair does talk about certain wrestlers, and he isn't always kind. Like I've said, I find it funny that both Mick Foley and Bret Hart have been upset about it, because both of them have made jabs at Flair in the past. Sounds like they are more upset with the WWE because they are promoting it, although when the WWE was promoting Foley's first book and he talked about Flair not being able to tell who Foley was even though he worked for Flair wasn't exactly kind. That was okay. Guess rules are different for different people.
RAW is smoking right now, and with the turn of Orton and wondering who is going to replace him in Evolution should be interesting. If the WWE was smart, they would drag out the replacement of Orton for at least a couple of weeks, maybe even to the next ppv. They should tease that Orton is going to be replaced, have everyone jockey for the position and then replace him with a shocker.
That is one problem with the WWE right now. They can't surprise anyone anymore. There are no shocks, and part of it is the Internet. They get word before anyone else, and before it even hits the tv, everyone already knows. That's too bad, but this is something they could surprise people with if they do it right.
Now, I have an idea for the WWE if they would want to consider it. They have Evolution, which is their version of the Horsemen. Now, what they could do which would be a really interesting angle, is bring back the Horsemen, only Flair would be on the other end. Think about that? Benoit and Orton as the founding members of the new Horsemen, and this could be the kicker. They could bring back Rowdy Roddy Piper, and use him in the role Flair serves in now with Evolution. Piper is close friends with Flair, as evidenced by Flair's own admission in his book, but they always play well off of each other. Since the WWE is sorely lacking in managers, these two could be at the top. Then Orton and Benoit could go through a recruiting of their own to get members, maybe bringing everything to a head on Survivor Series or something. I think that could make things very interesting.
Speaking of surprises, despite the Orton turn being somewhat of a surprise, it had been talked about all over the Internet, much like the supposed Edge turn, so it wasn't all that much of a surprise. I'm going to list the ten things that really surprised me over the years while I was watching wrestling. These are the things that just completely took you by surprise for one reason or another. I'm sure everyone's list is different, and feel free to share your own on the message board. But since everyone is into lists lately, I decided to do this one.....here we go.......
10. Rick Rude on both RAW and Nitro on the same night. Completely surprised me and I kept looking at the tv, not believing what I was seeing.
Some other surprises that get honorable mention;
George Steele losing his mind and ability to speak when he ran down to ringside during a Bruno Sammartino v Pedro Morales match.
Sgt. Slaughter going Arab was a big shock
Rock hitting Mankind with 12 chairshots during their "I Quit" match. We were all yelling hit him again, never thinking he actually would.
Flair bringing the WCW belt to the WWF
Madusa dropping the WWF woman's title in the trash in WCW
the massive flop of most of the ECW talent when they have gone elsewhere. I guess their method of doing matches hasn't translated when they go mainstream.
and finally......Owen's death during a ppv. A terrible shock and tragedy that I know I will never forget. My friends and I just didn't know what to do when they got back on and announced what had happened. The rest of the ppv was awkward to say the least.
Anyway let's move on.....
Now on to other streams of unconsciousness........
Pick up the DVD of The Girl Next Door. On of my favorite hot girls, Elisha Cuthbert is in it, and there is an unrated version. Now she doesn't get naked, but she doesn't need to because she's hot anyway. Another one to get if you can find it is Ichi the Killer, only get the unrated version. Weirdest movie I have seen lately is Revengers Tragedy. Very strange and it may take multiple viewings to figure it out.
Just saw: Open Water.....a great movie, but I have a bad feeling that it is going to get overrated much like Blair Witch did. It is simply a good, smart little film. It is not the second coming of Jaws. It is better than anything that M. Night has put out though. If you want something different, try Collateral. It is a really good, smart movie too. Very well acted and the tension is paced very taughtly as well.
Guilty Pleasure; Bought the complete first season of Sledge Hammer. If you don't remember this show, or if you were too young now is your chance to watch a classic spoof of Dirty Harry. It is funny, well acted, and it actually lasted into a second season.
well, that's it for now......so until I become the next Ansel Adams, keep reading.......sincerely, the Novak Notebook.
To a new and improved.....ahhh screw it, it's the same old Notebook that most of you have grown to love or at least read often throughout these months/years. I'm not Vince McMahon and I won't take the reader's suggestions on how to improve my column. Anyway, if I took the suggestions of most of the people who had ideas over the last few years, well let's just say someone can't drop dead that many times. So there.
Vince McMahon has finally gone and done it. Whether people realize it or not, Vince McMahon has put the public who has been squawking about his product on notice. He's essentially telling fans that if they don't like what he's doing with the WWE, then they can run it and see if they do it any better. Although what he is actually doing is giving the fans a false sense of control, McMahon has basically told the fans to put up or shut up. He's giving them choices on opponents, type of matches and it appears a few other things. Let's be honest here though, because if it were truly up to the fans then every match would be a tables, ladders, and chairs match, Hell in a Cell, HHH lose and beaten to within an inch of his life, and all of the Divas would be running around naked. We're going to have limited options, so that the WWE can still control some of it. It still is a pretty good idea, and we'll see if it carries over to any of the RAW or Smackdown programming. I am kind of anxious to see how it plays out.
The first thing that struck me about the ppv is that Taboo Tuesday is going to be held on, well Tuesday. At first many people may take a second look at that, but in reality what difference does it make whether it is Sunday or Tuesday. In actuality, the buy rate may be a little better on Tuesday than on Sunday for one simple reason.....FOOTBALL. Sometimes, I don't even care who is playing, as long as a football game is going on. You have football and baseball playoffs. There is nothing going on on Tuesday, and either way you still have to get up and go to work the next day anyway. So, try it and see what happens.
Well, well, well......a few ideas and storylines are mercifully coming to an end. The whole Diva search is finally over, and hopefully the Lita pregnant storyline will be coming to an end soon. Although I have a bad feeling that now we're going to go through the whole "who hired the schmo to kill Lita's baby" idea. Maybe Rikishi will come back and since he tried to kill Austin, figured he was on a roll.
Tough Enough, the show nobody cared about after the first season, is now coming back giving away a million dollars. Way to go Vince. Way to get fans to come back (it won't) and keep happy faces on your wrestlers (that definitely won't happen). They are busting their asses every day and night getting maybe a quarter mil a year, while some guy or girl is going to walk into the mix and win a million dollars. Let's be honest here.....Tough Enough hasn't exactly met with success. Maven is the only "success" although most true fans still don't view him as a real wrestler. Nidia has done all right, but what about the others. Miss Jackie is slowly disappearing, and the ones from season three or four (lost count) aren't even on television. It was an idea to cash in on the reality tv that just hasn't worked. Time to get rid of it.
I have read most of the Ric Flair book, and although I really like the book there are a few comments I would like to make. First, he really didn't talk a whole lot about the NWA, or before that. He mostly complained and sounded like a know it all, telling people what the promoters what they did wrong. The next thing is the book almost reads like a comic book with all of the pictures in it. I wouldn't mind the pics if they were in a five hundred page book or something along those lines, but in a nearly three hundred page book? It just kind of surprised me.
Now if the fans vote the way true fans watch wrestling, then Chris Benoit will face HHH. Benoit got hosed, no disrespect to Orton, but he should've never lost the belt. He was on a roll, gave the company a lift and was making everyone look good. Okay, Orton wins the belt, but then loses it to HHH a month later? Just stupid.
HHH is now on my list as an ultimate ass. A nine time heavyweight champ, and nobody really cares. Remember the Rock when he was the corporate champion? Well, now we have the real corporate champ. McMahon wonders why the ratings are lower, and I say people are sick and tired of HHH. He isn't a draw anymore, and the only way he was any good was when he had someone like Austin, Rock or Foley to play off of. Benoit was a good foil for him, but he never could carry a match, and he isn't the reason people tune in to watch a ppv. Want proof. Think of WWE stars, and I can name so many more that he wrestled that people paid to see. Austin, Rock, Undertaker, HBK, and Lesnar were all people fans paid to see. Guys like Angle, Jericho, Benoit, and Guerrero are all great wrestlers, but they aren't the attention getters. I think there is a difference, and I don't think the WWE realizes it. Characters carry the headlines, while the other guys are around to make them look good. You want more proof? Hogan and Piper were the two biggest names going in the mid-eighties. Yet neither one would be considered a great wrestler. Both had charisma coming out the ears and each could carry the company with their antics. Yet guys like Tito Santana, Ricky Steamboat, and even Savage carried the workload. They all had their loyal followings and each one was a star, but they weren't the ones carrying the company at the time. They could do the work but you couldn't put the company on their backs and go. With Rock, Undertaker, Austin, Hogan, Savage later one, Piper, Flair, HBK, and many others, you could just strap the company on their backs and let them go. Some were better wrestlers than others, but they all had the personality to keep the company going.
HHH may have been like that for a brief period of time, but for as many times as they have tried to strap the company on his back, he has proven he can't do it time and again. He hasn't dropped the ball, but he can only carry for a little bit of time, and that is basically the problem with the WWE. They have a number of very good workers, but nobody who can carry a team. If not, then how can it be that HHH can ramble on for twenty stupid minutes, and yet Ric Flair can deliver a much more potent speech in less than seven minutes? There have been many times when HHH talks, that I used to go and switch channels, just to see if there was anything else on that was more interesting. But alas, the kissing of HHH's ass continues each and every week on RAW.
It says something when the Divas rip each other to shreds and makes all of the heels look like little pansies. I do agree with HHH on that end of it. If they're going to let the Diva hopefuls do that, they need to let the heels and harder edged faces do that as well.
Finally got back to Pittsburgh for the last ppv, and it was fun to get together with my friends and catch up on old times. Although seeing HHH win for the millionth time was a bummer, hanging out was great. If you have the chance, I always recommend seeing a ppv with a bunch of people. It is always more enjoyable.
Now on to other things to talk about that may or may not involve wrestling.
DVD of the week: Of course it has to be the Star Wars movies. Star Wars was the first movie I went to see in theatres and actually me and the girls up the street went to see it, the younger one falling asleep in the theatre. It was so tremendous, I went on to see it 13 times. Now having it on DVD is a must for anyone who ever wanted them.
Also, if you haven't checked it out, I recommend Mean Girls. I truly funny movie. Tina Fey is a great writer.
Surprise of the month: USA Today raised its price to 75 cents. I would normally comment on a company that would raise its price by 50%, but they have been around since 1982 and have never increased their prices. They said when they came out that they would keep their price at 50 cents for five years, because at the time that was high for a daily newspaper, but they were true to their word, and 22 years later, they raise their prices.
Losing her mind: Britney Spears. I mean, two marriages in less than a year? And then she wonders why people can't take her seriously and question her mental capacity? Hmmm, wonder about that does she? Bet her ear still have smoke coming out of them.
TV to watch: I'm not a big tv guy, but I was intrigued by the show Lost on ABC. I tuned in and was not disappointed. It was an interesting show, held my interest and looks to stay interesting down the road. It could be this year's 24. I definitely like the looks of the show and will continue to watch.
Girl of the month: This could be a rotating thing with Elisha Cuthbert, Kiera Knightley and Sarah Michelle Gellar. Right now however, Hillary Duff (I know she's only 16) has a nice little cover on the new Blender magazine, and Kelly Carlson is on Stuff magazine. Both make you wonder why they bother putting words inside.
Speaking of Sarah Michelle Gellar: She is coming out with a movie called the Grudge. If you like the Ring, this one is one you won't want to miss. The movie is based on a Japanese movie, much like the Ring was based on what, but the novelty item here is that it is the same director that is directing the remake. That is nothing new, as Alfred Hitchcock did it three times (can you name the movies he did this with?) but it isn't all that often that the movie goes from one culture to another and keeps the director. It looks interesting and something to check out.
Well that's it for now boys and girls, so until the Notebook goes Hollywood, keep reading
Well, Taboo Tuesday has come and gone, and what have we learned? The real Taboo Tuesday is coming up in a little more than a week, so this Taboo Tuesday will shortly be forgotten.
That is the right word for this ppv event. Forgotten. Not the movie starring the beautiful Julianne Moore, but the wrestlers in the ppv. Not much changed because of this ppv, and the most significant development stemming from the ppv was Eric Bishoff getting his head shaved, which we have already seen. So in reality, not much was that great about this ppv.
In part, that was what was wrong with this ppv. Nothing stood out, and that is becoming the case with all of the ppvs lately. There isn't anything that is a must-see. Remember Must-see TV on Thursday nights on NBC? Yeah, I know it was awhile ago, but think back. Well, the buzz is what made it must-see. There is no buzz around the WWE right now. Even Pat Patterson had to "retire" because of his suggestions and what he told Vince about the problems with the WWE. Vince does not want to hear that HHH is in any way shape or form a part of the problem, and anyone who disagrees is going to run into a major confrontation with Vince.
Is HHH the problem? No. He's a big part of it but he isn't the problem. Does anyone really care that he is chasing Ric Flair's 16 time world champion mark? Does anyone know he on number 9? Would anyone know if he wouldn't keep reminding everyone? I've said it before and I'll say it again; HHH is good when he has someone good to work with who has loads of personality (Austin, Rock, and Foley), but the fans just don't care about him at all when he is in the lead. Plus, with most of the fans knowing he pulls alot of backstage politics, he really isn't liked. Remember when Nitro was beating the snot out of RAW? Why were they doing that? Because Bishoff knew that HHH would come out and do a twenty minute tirade that bored everyone to tears, so he would open the show with a bang and therefore causing people to change the channel. I mean, if Vince was honest with himself, he would see a direct corelation between HHH becoming top dog and the numbers starting to dip down.
HBK v HHH? I voted for Benoit, and I know a lot of other people that did too. The rest of the results were right in line with what I thought they would be, but that one kind of surprised me. HBK v HHH we've seen before a hundred times. Benoit v HHH is always good, and HHH has never beaten Benoit. Edge has never faced him period, so I would've expect that to be a close second. The rest of the results, as I've said were in line with everything I would've expected.
Seriously, where was the buzz? The curiosity factor of how the voting would turn out is the only thing that would draw peoples' attention. Does anyone care about HHH and who he faces? Kane and Snitzkey is interesting but hardly worth a ppv show yet. And other than Flair v Orton, did any of the other matches even register with anyone. Jericho v Benjamin could've been fun, but this is where the voting backfired because with 15 people in the voting, they couldn't develope any heat with anyone of the 15 for an extended period of time.
Here's another theory of mine that came to me as I sit here and watch the Red Sox winning game two. Has anyone considered the price of the ppv as part of the problem? I mean they have remained around $35 per ppv ($50 for Wrestlemania) for a few years now, but the question is with the economy the way it is, do people have the disposable income they once had? I mean $35 times 1 isn't that big a deal, but you multiply it out by 10 or twelve and you start running into some money. I think most of the same people that were watching ppv's a few years ago are watching them now, but they aren't watching as many. They know some of them are going to suck, and why would you want to plunk down $35 for something that you aren't going to enjoy? So, the public has become more selective about the various ppvs they are going to buy. It's no different than in baseball, football, or other sports. If the team is doing well, you'll keep buying tickets. If the team isn't performing the way you would like to see (like the Pittsburgh Pirates stinking out the joint for the last decade plus) then you simply won't go to the games. The WWE has decided that a hundred ppvs a year is the answer to their problems, but they aren't putting out the matches people want to see, they don't have the must-see qualities that they did years ago, and so people are being much more selective than they were. One match can't really carry a ppv anymore. If people are going to spend the money, then there have to be at least several matches that appeal to them, and a few others that the fans are curious to see.
The Diva search was fun and exiciting (not) and has carried on far too long. The Divas in school girl outfits is something I don't mind seeing, but once you see them in the outfits, does anyone pay attention to the matches? Trish Stratus has turned herself into a really good wrestler, when pushed by her opponents, and I do like the way the heel turn has played out. However, she has only three people to wrestle here and there. Since you really don't have that many women to work with, why not just make them (gosh this is original) women? Instead of heels and faces, just make them all women vying for the title. It opens up the division a little better, and they can all appeal to the crowd in their own way. They can each do good or bad, or even naughty if they want. Other than that, it is pretty limited when you have to throw Stacy Kiebler in there to mix things up. Now, don't get me wrong, I like Stacy Kiebler (a lot actually), but she isn't a wrestler. She's making it a little more passable than she used to but it's still obvious that the other women have to play down to her because she can't elevate her game yet.
Now on to a short list by a long winded man;
>Who the hell has Chris Jericho pissed off when he can never beat HHH, making a feud for the title later on down the road seem impossible (thus killing a serious contender for HHH who has a lot more charisma and likeability with the crowd), and then keeps losing the Intercontinental title, getting buried in mid-card matches after the fact? I've never seen HHH go down to mid-card even for a little while after he loses.
>Who are the women left on Smackdown? I forget.
>Where's George the Animal when you need him?
>In the action figure world, the WWE has been making action figures of their past stars, and in the new line Roddy Piper is going to be in it. It also looks like he is going to have the long hair in this version.
>Piper's Pit is coming back yet again? Let's hope TNA learned from the WWE and doesn't turn it into Vince's Pit.
>So Hulk Hogan wants to have his daughter wrestle with him? If she was smart she would say no, especially if she wants to be taken seriously as a singer. Don't believe me? Ask Cyndi Lauper where her career went after she got involved with wrestling. Her career in music was actually ahead of Madonna's, and she had more hits and a better voice. She got involved with wrestling and the hits died off. Brooke Hogan has a good voice, and although she may get lumped in with the other teenage girl singers out there, I would recommend doing something other than wrestling to get her career off and running. How many celebrities have actually advanced their careers after they got involved with wrestling? I can't remember any.
>What I'm watching? Baseball playoffs and World Series action of course. Hoping big time for the Red Sox.
>What else am I watching? Lost on ABC Wednesday night. It is an interesting show so far and really has grabbed my attention. I really want to see where this goes. It is kind of like Gilligan's Island with bite and without a Professor who knows how to build everything but a boat. I mean, wood, rope, and you can't build a raft or boat??
>Ginger or Maryann? Definitely Maryann. She was wearing the Daisy Duke shorts even before Daisy Duke was around.
>What am I reading? America by Jon Stewart. It looks like a text book but it is hilarious. It is funny, sharp and pokes fun at everyone.
>What am I listening to? ESPN Radio. I hate regular radion stations because they either play the same five songs over and over again, or for every fifteen songs they play, you like two of them.
>What to see? Team America: World Police. It was very funny and worth watching. Also the Forgotten was a very interesting take on abductions.
>Newest Site visited. Motorcycle Hall of Fame and Museum outside of Columbus. Also Buckeye Lake.
>What am I listening to? Joss Stone's newest album. Pretty good. So far a very solid effort. Listening to mostly older stuff though...looking for some greatest hits albums (no not going to get Britney's greatest hits...unless it's like Paris Hilton type video ;-)
>DVD to look out for. Shaun of the Dead. It was a small British movie that came out earlier this year and did okay. When it comes out on DVD I highly recommend it. I got a nice copy and watched it (although I think it was an unrated import) and it was a very good movie.
>Guilty pleasure of the week. My coin collection. Went out and bought a ten dollar gold piece from 1932. Although it took nearly a quarter of my paycheck, it was a nice coin and since I like to shop and buy stuff, I had to add it to my collection.
Well, that's it for now, so until Stacy Kiebler wants to come over and be my French Maid...keep reading.....sincerely, the Novak Notebook.
I was going to write yet another scathing report on the supposed greatness of HHH, but after viewing a few things recently in the world of sports, I decided to table that argument for another time when I have nothing better to write about.
As many of you are aware, we recently held an election in this country, and one of the central issues focused on the moral fabric of the candidates. Supposedly that was also a major concern among the people voting as well. It wasn't the special interest money, or anything of that nature, but the moral character of the two main candidates. Also supposedly, the more moral character won the election. I'm still working out the bugs of how the re-elected President is so moral, since we have had more freedoms removed or curtailed in the last four years than in any previous Presidential tenure, but that is an argument for another time.
Since we have had the election, we have seen scantily clad white women with African Americans, fights breaking out all over the place, and everyone from coaches to fans trying to either run for their lives, defend themselves, or hold people back. And none of it was in wrestling.
Remember when wrestling was chastized as sleazy and violent without a point. Look who is laughing now. Vicne McMahon did a hilarious skit with the help of Trish Stratus and Sheldon Benjamin ripping into these groups of people who always had thought of themselves as so much higher than the WWE. At least the stuff on the WWE was a show, whether it was in bad taste or not. The Pacers, Pistons, Steelers, Browns, Clemson, and South Carolina were all putting on live performances. Now McMahon is making those people who touted the WWE as trash looking like fools themselves.
Let's take a look at all of these issues, because there is something to be said about most of them.
First the one that makes the least amount of sense. The whole Monday Night Football thing with Terrell Owens and Nicolette Sheridan. I saw it, didn't think much about it, and at the most thought it was mildly amusing. I can't believe people are creating this story out of almost nothing. ABC has the right to promote their programs on Monday Night Football how they want, since they pay a ridiculous amount of money for the program. If the NFL is going to get on a high horse about stuff like this, they can kiss that income goodbye, because it won't be worth it to ABC to carry the programming. Also, they look a little hypocritical when they run adds like the Coors Twins, the Budwieser cat fight a few years ago, nearly everytime they come back from a commercial and nothing it going on in the field of play, they cut to a cheerleader. I mean, c'mon. Who do they think they are kidding. And the people who say they don't want to expose their family to stuff like this, well pull them out of whatever bubble you have them stashed away in, dust them off, and explain the facts of life to them. They didn't see anything worse on that skit than they would see going to a beach or pool, in terms of lack of clothing. As for the suggestiveness of the material, guess they haven't heard of soap operas. And saying that their kids can't tell the difference because they know football is real, and mixing it with this confuses them; I mean are you being serious. Your kids can't tell the difference between reality and fiction. The guy isn't on a football field, so he isn't playing football....hence it is fake. Guess these are the same people who said they couldn't be responsible for their kids lighting matches because they saw Beavis and Butthead do it on TV. Since when is the television the babysitter in this country? Are we so neglectful that we just plop our kids down, walk away and ignore them. What do we say when there is a violent hit in the game and everyone is cheering? Doesn't that confuse the child more? The other thing that really pisses me off about this story was that it was everywhere, yet 51 people died in Fallujah that day over in Iraq. This is a real war and people are dying, yet we are concerned with something that is fake and where nobody got hurt and nothing happened. This wasn't a wardrobe malfunction and nothing happened, other than seeing a naked back of an actress. People need to get off their high horses, turn off their tvs every once in awhile, spend time with their kids, and see that there is a real world out there with real problems that need fixed.
On to the other fights that happened over the past week. Steelers and Browns got into a fight before the game started, Pacers and Pistons fight was so bad they had to call the game, and now we have college kids emulating them. The funny thing is when we had people going out and doing backyard wrestling, it was the WWE's fault because these kids were looking up to the WWE heroes and doing what they saw. Just today I started to hear that the kids were emulating what they saw in the to professional games. Most dismissed it and said it was a poor excuse. I agree. These aren't ten year olds and nine year olds doing this. These kids are in college and should know better. However, if that is the case, then the same can be said for the kids that were doing backyard wrestling. It is no different than someone reading a Superman comic, going and putting a red towel around his neck and jumping out a window, thinking he can fly. People in this country need to grow up and take responsibilty for their own actions. Not everyone is this country is a victim. But the more I listen to some of these lawsuits, and more importantly the ridiculous renderings, the more I am convinced there are alot of people out there who lack any intelligence whatsoever.
What the WWE did last night was hysterical. McMahon was finally able to get back at everyone who has been trashing him all these years. My only complaint was that he should've made it a theme for the evening. He should have drawn it out over the entire night and then done something really raunchy at the end of the evening to prove that he still has what it takes. It would've been funny and stuck it to everyone who complains about his programming.
What I can't understand is through all of this, everyone is saying the right things, but yet wrong things are still being done, showing what is wrong with pro sports. Why are they appealing the suspensions? They won't have that option when these cases go to trial (oh wait, yes they will...remember everyone is a victim). Just accept the suspensions, shut up and let the games heal themselves. NBA had a real opportunity to put itself on the map this year with no hockey. Football is played twice a week, and baseball had everyonce excited for more sports. Basketball could've proved that it was a great sport with great athletes who can do more than jump three inches in the air to put a ball through a hoop. But instead it has done quite the opposite and shown itself to have thugs and miscrients in their ranks, so anyone who might have tuned in here and there will be completely turned off. I feel bad for David Stern because he seems like the best of the big commissioners out there, yet he has a lot of work to do ahead of him. They dropped the ball with this one and their image will be tarnished for quite some time.
Meanwhile, the WWE doesn't look so bad anymore. Haven't had any major problems with fans lately. They still go over and visit in Iraq, whereas I here little of that over in the other major sports. They still try and be available for the fans, even though morale is at an all-time low. You hear about their blow-ups with each other, but you don't see them. Even when the World Wildlife Foundation is still breathing down their neck, because they're whiny and probably lost money when the WWE changed their name, the WWE is still trying to tick along. They will come out of this with the last laugh, if Monday Night RAW is just the tip of the iceberg. What McMahon should do is play this out as long as he can, because he has been beaten on for so long, it's time he gives some back.
Well, that's it for now....so until I get some models to let me photograph them nude.......keep reading....Sincerely the Novak Notebook
Have to discuss many different things for awhile, since I can't watch wrestling for the next couple of months. I can read the reports and keep following what is going on. Other than that, I have to keep watching Monday Night Football or something like that.
Right now the Notebook wants to talk about HHH in Blade:Trinity. Now I'm not going to rip HHH about his role or anything like that. I think he took a tremendous risk playing a vampire who likes little dogs. It's cute.
I went and saw the movie the Saturday after it opened. While I'm still recovering from the sticker shock of paying $9.50 for a matinee movie (I would still like to talk to the crack head who came up with that number). I am a big fan of the Blade movies, but this one falls a little flat. And believe it or not, HHH really has nothing to do with the movie falling flat.
The movie was stiff, from Snipes and Biel's acting, to really jokey from Ryan Reynolds perspective. I liked some of the humor, because it was different from the previous movies, but at times there was too much humor, and with the wooden acting from Snipes and Biel, it couldn't overcome it.
Jessica Biel looked great and looked like she was working really hard on her shape, which she did successfully. But she isn't there yet on the acting level. Parker Posey blew her away, even though her humor was sometimes silly as well.
HHH was actually pretty good as a muscle man in the movie. I liked him and I liked the fact he chose this role. Instead of trying to pick up a main role in a small movie, take a second banana role in a mainstream movie. It was a perfect role for a guy his size, and he was able to get his feet wet without the weight of the entire movie on his back.
A funny thing happened on the way to the movies that day however. I also watched Ocean's Twelve, and before the movie started, I saw a preview for one of the Rock's upcoming movies. It's called "Be Cool". It is a sort of sequel to "Get Shorty", with John Travolta and Danny DeVito coming back. The Rock plays a bodyguard, and this could be something which gets the Rock recognized by a bigger audience. It's not an action movie, it is a comedy, and he does the same thing in this movie that HHH did in his. Take a smaller role. Like I said, I think both have a much better chance of breaking into bigger movies if they take their time and work their way in to ensemble casts.
HHH had some interesting things to say in this month's Penthouse issue. He says all the right things, but he also makes it sound like both he and the Rock have been getting scripts forever. He also makes it sound like the Rock jumped, while he wants to be a wrestler first and foremost. He says he didn't jump because the roles weren't right. They sometimes had no lines or one or two lines. Well, you have to start somewhere. Look at the Rock. He started with the Scorpian King with a line or two in another language. It moved on to his own Scorpian King movie. That worked out well for him, although he had some bumps after that.
I'm not sure whether either man, Rock or HHH, will eventually rule Hollywood. HHH says he isn't looking for Oscar nominations or anything like that, but he'll be more than willing to blow anything or anyone up. I kind of like that attitude. He has the look, and he could be a big action hero. Unfortunately, everyone from Brian Bosworth to Dolph Ludgren thought they could be action heroes as well. It depends on what kind of movies they get into.
Which brings us back to both men. HHH might play this right and be in a few small roles first before trying to be in a few bigger action movies. The Rock has already made the jump to lead actor with mixed results. Scorpian King was a hit, the Rundown was a mild hit, and Walking Tall didn't do much of anything. Now the pressure is on for the Rock to produce something big. If the new movie Be Cool is something of a hit, he will get some of the credit. If it isn't, Travolta and a few others may get most of the blame, so it could work out as a no lose situation for him.
And that leads us to Roddy Piper. He has done a little of everything. He was in a cult hit (Hell Comes to Frogtown), was in a number one movie at the box office (They Live), was in a few other movies after that, worked in television on a Burt Reynolds movie and a Love Boat reunion movie. He had a fairly productive career in Hollywood, but what does he do now. He still has the tag of a wrestler who wants to act, even though he has been working in Hollywood since nearly before Jessica Biel was born. But he's barely mentioned, looks like he has nothing in the pipes for down the road, while guys with no talent like Van Damme and Segal still get movies that come out on DVD.
Why did I bring up the Rowdy One? Well, he is the lesson for the other ones that are following. Goldberg, Rock, Austin, and HHH might think they have a bright future ahead of them. They are relatively young, big, bad, and have a fan base. Remember, Piper had all of that back in 1987, and he was coming off being the most hated man of the year and becoming most popular man of the year in wrestling. Where did that get him? Movies like "Buy and Cell", and shows like "Tag-Team". It didn't last too long, even after a hit like They Live. So just as fast as it can arrive, the fame can fade as well, so all of these guys need to remember that when they're picking their roles, otherwise they will end up the next Roddy Piper in Hollywood. Wrestlers who want to act.
So until the Notebook turns in a bestseller, keep reading.....sincerely, the Novak Notebook.
By saying that HHH won the title.....again.....whoopdee frickin' do. After not really losing it in the first place, he fought valiantly and is now a ten time world champion. Ratings keep falling, fans keep groaning, and the McMahon's and HHH have the nerve to say he isn't part of the problem? Who didn't see this coming? Hasn't this been done a million times before? Is there anybody left who even cares. I mean now HHH has come up with a way to get past Flair's sixteen time title reign without even losing the belt in the first place. When Flair won all of those titles, yes some of them were in a rather short time span, but the overall span was something like a good fifteen years. What's the rush HHH? Afraid someone else is going to come along and you'll never get the title back. Not only does he keep winning the title back, but he also ends up holding onto it the longest. Maybe he figures he needs to get all the title chances in before the steroids do him in. In some ways, I'm glad I can't watch wrestling right now, because I am soooo sick of HHH it isn't even funny.
Now on to other matters. RVD has been ripped by several people, and the up management in the WWE for not going to Iraq in recent weeks with a number of other superstars. I want to make a few points on this matter. First, remember that these are the same people who decided to leave a lucrative USA contract for smaller TNN (now Spike), came out and said they were in the entertainment business, and also changed the name of the company to WWE instead of going to WWWF. Just some food for thought there. Second, if I'm in Iraq and I get to see and hug Torrie Wilson, Dawn Marie, Stacy Keibler, I'm really not going to be too worried about whether RVD is there or not. Gimme Stacy in cammo shorts any day of the week, and RVD can rest all he wants. Third, with the schedule the way it is for the WWE (remember, they are the ones that came out and said that there is no off season in the WWE) maybe RVD was a little banged up and needed some time away, and this was the perfect time to do it. Fourth, it wasn't mandatory. That means you don't have to go if you don't want to. If everyone is getting upset and saying you should've gone, guess what? It was mandatory.
Now I'm not taking sides here for the most part. I applaud what Vince and the WWE do with our troops, which is usually a hell of a lot more than other sports can say. They are over there quite often and entertain and show support which is a wonderful thing. The troops need our support. Whether or not you agree with the war shouldn't matter, because the troops are not the ones who made the decision to go over there. They are doing their job much like many of us do each and every day. We all do things we don't like, but we have to do it anyway because it's part of our job. Their job is the same way, although quite a bit more dangerous. I believe in our troops, even though I think the war is wrong. What the WWE does is show them that they are not forgotten and are very important to the USA.
However, RVD is a human being. He needs vacations and breaks. He needs time off, especially considering the type of wrestling he does. Vince said it was optional to go over to Iraq, which is the way it should be. If you have to go, then the meaning is shallow. RVD took that to mean he could stay or go, so he stayed and probably took some time to refresh himself. I don't have a problem with that. By the same token I don't have a problem if in general the WWE feels disappointed by his decision. Most people should want to go over to support the troops, considering they are protecting what little rights you have left, so I have no problem with Vince feeling a tad upset by the decision. But to come out and say there is heat and friction and all kinds of other stuff on RVD is just stupid. He made a decision. There is no right or wrong here, so there should be no heat. Who the heat should be on is little Mrs. Hunter for why things aren't turning around. Instead of blaming everyone from Pat Patterson to RVD to Paul Heyman is just silly. Isn't this THE VINCENT KENNEDY MCMAHON dammit? Shouldn't he have been able to turn things around by now. I don't even know why RVD took the time off. It could be something as simple as he was dejected and just didn't feel like going. I don't know whether or not I'm okay with that or not, but it is his decision. Like I said, if you wanted him to go, make it mandatory. Since you didn't, leave him alone.
So is the WWE playing with fire once again? Hassan instead of Sgt. Slaughter this time. I think this character is getting a bit of a different reaction than Slaughter did for several reasons. First, this guy isn't nearly as fun to watch as old Searge. Second, when Slaughter did it, he literally became a traitor, whereas this guy is just some poor Arab who wonders why he is being persecuted. Third, alot of people kinda agree with him. Fourth, did I mention how good an actor ol' Searge was? Fifth, this is a real war with over a thousand people dead and many thousands more wounded, whereas the Persian Gulf war was over in about a week with less than a hundred casualties. Big difference. If they want to get this guy over, the WWE is going to have to do some major stuff with him, but they better be really, really careful. With how everyone feels right now, I have a feeling if this guy lit a flag on fire the security guards would have their hands full. It is a sensitive time, so you can't go too overboard with Hassan to get him over, without risking mass chaos or rioting. Vince may want to tread lightly with this one, or someone may be stomping a mudhole in him and walking it dry.
Why hasn't Stephanie come out and taken congrats and handshakes for all the great ideas she's.......oh that's right there haven't been any yet.
The ECW via the WWE DVD that came out made me yearn for the days when you had the Monday night wars and then searched for ECW on Saturday nights. It was a wonderful time in history indeed.
Now I watch 24, Lost, Alias and my Steelers are in the playoffs, hoping they get to the Super Bowl. Tough Jets team this weekend. Picking Steelers v Colts and Vikings v Flacons. Winners get to the Superbowl.
With Randy Johnson pushing cameramen out of the way in NYC, who needs wrestling?
Why not just have a ppv every other week? Wouldn't you even make more money that way? That ridiculous argument was why the WWE went to 14 or so ppvs a year. They don't have the talent to have eight, much less 14. That argument makes about as much sense as running all your change through a blender saying that you'll have more money when it comes out.
Some things you will never see........
>Fozzy winning a Grammy
Some things you should see......
>I like the idea of all of the Divas in Playboy.....I like that idea quite a bit actually.
and finally.....
Although I guess you could just about say that any moment you wanted. But I digress, even though I am not quite sure I was gressing in the first place.
An article popped up in a recent issue of TV Guide that caught my attention. It dealt with the "latest" trend in television where the hot tv show leads directly into the next one, to keep the ratings going. Also it talked about the shows opening with a bang, again to keep the ratings up. The article went on to say that this "new" method of grabbing the viewers attention was working quite well for shows such as 24, Lost, and Alias, and you could expect other stations to start doing this. It not only grabs the viewers attention, but really stops them from changing the channel, just so they can see what is going to happen.
As you may have noticed, I put several words in quotes up above. The reason I did this is because TV Guide got it wrong, and I am mocking them. This isn't a latest trend or something new. We're not talking about the birth of a new direction in television here. Once again, this was used several years ago by the world of professional wrestling, and yet despite all of the harsh criticism they take, they get none of the credit.
During the Monday Night Wars between WCW and the WWF, they were doing things like that all the time. It was actually revolutionary back then, as was the way they watched the top and quarter hours to see when viewers would change the channels. If they saw a weakness in their programming, they would go about installing something in that slot to sure it up.
But if you recall, both programs would try and start off with a bang (either the NWO or Stone Cold), have something happen immediately that would continue through the rest of the night. They would also start something near the top of the hour before they would go to commercial break, so they could ensure that you would return once the commercial was over. It even got to the point when they would watch where each others commercials fell, so they could come back with something hot during the other one's commercial time.
So, not only was the booking of the matches great during this high time in wrestling, but hooking an audience and keeping them through your next commercial break was also vital. It was a clever time during which there were many interesting tactics, to say the least.
When the WWF was taped, WCW would announce the results, hoping to draw viewers away. It worked several times, but it backfired one big time. When they announced Mick Foley (aka Mankind at the time) was going to win the title, everyone and their mother switched over to see it happen. It backfired so badly, that the WCW never tried a stunt like that again.
They would start matches, have them continue throughout the commercial break. They would have someone storm out to the ring, wait around until after the commercial to talk. They would introduce one wrestler, and wait until they came back to introduce the mystery opponent. Surprise appearances would show up at these crucial times. Swerves, big matches, big announcements, and emmotional moments were all tied into what the other person was doing at the time, and then jumping when the time was right. As I said, it was a very clever time during wrestling heyday.
Now on to other important matters. Namely the Divas. I'm all for the likes of Stacy Keibler (believe me I am), Torrie Wilson, and Dawn Marie. They are fun to watch, more fun to look at, and can get someone to be a heel faster than any number of promos. All someone has to do is start slapping them around, and instantly the crowd is against them, by the same token all someone has to do is come down and rescue them, and they are an instant fan favorite. They serve their purpose and they are an enjoyable sideline to the wrestling. But right now there is a problem.
Just when you thought the WWE was going to take the women's division a little more seriously, all of a sudden you have a huge influx of divas that can do little more than shake their ass, smile, and wave. Now don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with a hot woman shaking her booty all over the place, but when you look as they cut people like Gail Kim, and the women's division is basically reduced to little more than a few lingerie pillow fights, something is askew. You had the makings of the best women's division in years.
Trish Stratus is still a solid wrestler, and she gets better each time she goes out. Molly is very solid as well as underappreciated. Jazz was the monster when she wasn't hurt. Victoria was pretty flexable, and could go back and forth betweem heel and face. Gail Kim was an up and coming talent. Lita was the high flyer, again when she wasn't hurt. They could've trained this Cristy Hemme and made her another talented wrestler. She seems to have the desire, and the athletic ability to pull it off, but instead they get her to come out and wave and smile, then get in a stupid pillow fight.
And while we're at it, why on earth is the WWE cutting all of these other wrestlers, yet turning around and hiring all of these DIVAS. They're doing the same thing with the girls that they did with the wrestlers. They're not all DIVAS. Some of them are divas, but some of them are glorified Hooters girls. At least the Hooters girls work hard for a living. But this bothered me when the WWE proclaimed that all of their wrestlers were "WWE Superstars". Really? That's a pretty bold claim, considering most of the people of America don't know who 98% of your wrestlers are. Even other sports don't say that every one of their players is a star. Not every actor is on the A list. Not every painter is a Picasso, nor is every photographer an Ansel Adams. No matter what field it is, you have people that are on top of the food chain, and you have many more that are striving to be there. By proclaiming that everyone is a DIVA or a Superstar, you are saying that they have already made it.
With the death of Johnny Carson recently, it got me thinking. If you really think about it, probably anyone under the age of 25 doesn't really know who he is and what the big deal is all about. Their life begins and ends with either Leno or Letterman. Kind of interesting how something like that makes you feel old all of a sudden. I'm going to go through a few things here, so indulge me if you will. I'm going to compare what's happened with me with someone who was born in 1980 (25 years ago).
When I was born, we were in the middle of the Vietnam War, and Richard Nixon was in his first term in office. You take someone who is 25, Vietnam was over for six years when they were born, and Jimmy Carter was President, about to lose the upcoming election to Ronald Reagan. I stayed up watching that election routing for independent candidate John Anderson. NOW; We've had two major campaigns since the Vietnam war, and both Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan have died.
The First movie I remember going to see is the original Star Wars. I saw it thirteen times, and my mother was even bold enough to let her nearly seven year old go into the theatre by himself on a few occasions, and then pick him up after the movie was over. Someone who was 25 was born when The Empire Strikes Back was being released for the first time (I saw that seven times in the theatre). When those people turned 17, they were able to actually go and see the first Star Wars re-released on the big screen, although with some different footage. NOW; we are working on the sixth and final (according to George Lucas) Star Wars movie, which is going to be in theatres this summer.
My Favorite TV shows growing up were MASH and probably Night Court. I also loved the Twilight Zone and stuff like that. The nice thing about DVD is that now all of these classic shows can be watched and treasured by future generations. But someone born in 1980, MASH was nearing the end of its run, while Night Court wasn't even on yet. The big talk around that time was who shot JR on Dallas. NOW; reality tv is front and center in the television world, although I can't understand how it can be considered reality tv. Once you turn a camera on, it no longer is real. But it must be a generational thing.
Also consider in 1980; the first space shuttle wouldn't be launched for another year, the Berlin Wall was still standing, the USSR was still a major force to be reckoned with, the Red Sox still hated Bucky Dent and didn't even know who Bill Buckner was (I think he was with the Cubs at the time, or the Dodgers), the Pirates had just won the World Series the year before, the Steelers were still the dynasty talk, Tom Brady was 2 or 3 years old, Joe Montana was still in Notre Dame I think. Raging Bull was the huge boxing movie instead of a boxing movie about women, while Clint Eastwood was trying something new with his career; comedies. The Cold War was still something that was present, especially with the 1980 summer and winter games. The summer games were boycotted by the US because they were in Moscow, and the winter games had the miracle on ice. By the time someone turned ten that was born in 1980, we had a Bush in the White House, and the Berlin Wall was a thing of the past. In 1980, nobody in this country knew who Mikhail Gorbechev was, and Nelson Mandella was still in jail. South Africa was still heavy into apartheid and Barry Bonds was still in high school.
The big time wrestlers back then were Bob Backlund, Billy Graham, Andre the Giant, and Ric Flair was just starting to emerge. Harley Race was King before he wore the crown, and Dusty Rhodes was bringing it to the pay window. Roddy Piper was a young up n' comer, as was Hulk Hogan. The Rock was barely out of diapers, and Randy Orton wasn't even born yet. HHH wasn't the game, and Austin had all of his hair. The Hart dynasty and the unfortunate tragedies were just beginning in Calgary, while Randy Savage was two or three years removed from being a minor league catcher.
No one had ever heard of ECW, or for that matter WCW. It was the NWA and the WWWF. Ted Turner hadn't even thought about rasslin' at that point, while Vince McMahon Sr. was running things in the WWWF. Nobody had heard of Summerslam, the Royal Rumble, Survivor Series, or even pay-per-view. Nobody thought people would actually pay to see wrestling on tv, much less shell out $35-$50 a month to watch it. And Wrestlemania was still not on the boards yet. Hard as it is to believe, the "granddaddy" of them all is still less than 25 years old. Don't get me wrong, it has had a great run, but just remember that by the time Wrestlemania aired in 1985 (when I was fourteen and a half by the way), you had already had 18 Super Bowls, and 70 World Series. There hadn't been talk of hockey in the south, much less cancelling the season. In fact I think there were still more teams in Canada than in the US at that point.
Yup, hearing about Johnny Carson's death brought back a lot of memories, and hearing younger people asking what the big deal was put things in perspective. Things change, and time moves along. Those of us who cherish wrestlers from the past, such as Roddy Piper, Hulk Hogan, Ric Flair and Andre the Giant should cherish those memories fondly, but remember that the kids today most likely aren't going to know who you are talking about. When they see these guys, they were either old when they saw them, or they caught a brief glimpse of them, and it doesn't hold nearly the meaning for them that it did for us, because we were around the first time it happened. By the same token, when they talk about your music being old fashioned, or what you like being out of date, gently remind them (or not so gently) that time does a funny thing. It will make what they like and cherish old and obsolete some day too.
Well, that's about it for now.....so until Heather and I write the mother of all columns....keep reading...sincerely the Novak Notebook...
The WWE seems to be turning things around, consistently ranking number one in the ratings for cable programs for the first time in awhile. This is on the heels of the WWE kind of making it known that it might be heading back to the USA network. I think this would be a great idea for several reasons. One the WWE has always been bigger than the audience that the Spike network has allowed. While some thought it made sense for them to switch to Spike TV, others (like me) thought it made absolutely no sense, especially considering they had no competition. There was no reason for casual fans to watch to see what was going to happen since the envelope wasn't going to be pushed, so the next logical thing was to be on as many cable stations as you could possibly be on. Instead they move to the Spike network and start having problems with their ratings.
Now Randy Orton is hurt (again) and looks like he may be heading over to Smackdown. While Smackdown can certainly use him, I'm sure Dawn Marie and Torrie Wilson are wondering what they did wrong to deserve him. Although Orton seems to have talent beyond compare, he is already developing a reputation backstage, and has women quitting over him. Not because they love him so much that they can't bare to be around him, but they want to leave because they can't stand him. That doesn't exactly speak volumes of Randy. Now he is young and hopefully he will mature. But let's look at this thing. He isn't in high school, and he is in his mid twenties, so he should know better. He got a run at being champ, and it looks like it went to his head (sounds like Brock right?). Maybe being buried on Smackdown for a little bit might humble him.
Now, I've been a HHH basher for quite some time. I'll admit it that I'm not a big fan of HHH, and I will probably never be a fan of his, but I will say this. From everything I hear, he does seem to carry himself professionally away from the ring. He does have political stroke and he does use it, but it is no different than Nash, Hall, and Hogan doing the same thing. But you don't hear about him getting into fights (Henning and Brock), doing nasty things to the girls as a "joke" (Randy Orton). There are a few professional among the wrestlers nowadays (Undertaker, Benoit, and Jericho) and HHH is right there with them. Like I said, I'm not a big fan, but he does carry himself with class away from the ring, so at least he puts his money where his mouth is.
So, the Rock won't be coming back anytime soon, unless the WWE re-ups his contract? I don't think they should give him the kind of money that he most likely wants for a part time wrestler, if he is even that. Let him make his movies and see what happens. If he has a successful career, great that's wonderful. If it doesn't work, let him come back, but make sure he comes back on a semi-regular basis. The WWE didn't back down from Goldberg and Brock and their ridiculous demands, so they shouldn't do the same with the Rock. They are on good terms with him, they should leave it at that.
Having Piper and Austin in the ring together was great. If only these two were in their prime. That is one feud that could've eclipsed Piper-Hogan or McMahon-Austin. With the antics those two pulled off, people would've tuned in every week just to see what those two were going to do. But, at least we got to see them together, if only for a moment. Wonder if Carlito knows how lucky he was to get his clock cleaned by those two legends?
Been having fun the last few weeks, going to Lake Placid and back to Cooperstown. Plus I have a video game I play at the arcade after work. It's called Derby Owner Cup and it is horse racing. You breed the horses, train them and race them. I've gotten pretty good, where I now have the all-time money leading horse called Rowdy for More (have lots of Rowdy horses-a tribute). Two of my newest horses are also wrestling inspired; the Crippler and the Jobber. The Jobber is climbing into the top twenty all-time, and the Crippler has a track record. This has nothing to do with wrestling on tv, but what can you do.
Well, finally the end is near....according to Revelations on NBC. Anyway, the WWE seems to be making some headway and going back in the right direction. It was down for a few years, and it looks like it is back on the rebound. It is typical of anything that is on for a long period of time. Saturday Night Live, Letterman, ER, all have had slumps and come back and rebounded nicely. It is different with wrestling, since it is on cable, but it's still the same principle. Put out the product, and eventually the people will tune in. They seem to be heading back, so if the WWE just keeps doing what it is doing, everything should be fine.
So, until I win the mega million in New York and retire Lost on my own island...keep reading....
Challenging, mind wrenching issue of the Notebook we will be able to discuss several different topics.
The Notebook finally got to start watching wrestling again, although the irony is the place I'm staying just outside of Cleveland has the cable stations that carry wrestling, I work so late now that I miss a good amount of the shows. I'm still able to watch enough to give my opinion on those shows, plus a few other topics.
I like the draft. Plain and simple, and I can't spell it out any more simply for that (sorry for some of you out there). It is always good to change things up a bit, and both shows were getting stale. Getting Benoit off of RAW, where he can maybe challenge for the world title again is a good opportunity to turn things around. Smackdown has always been second tier, since the Rock left, and it looks like the WWE is going to continue to make it second tier. They trade over a few good talents, but then the WWE takes away guys like Angle and Cena. That doesn't make any sense at all. I'm not sure what they are trying to accomplish, because they took away two solid draws, and Smackdown doesn't have many to begin with. Like I said, I like the draft, but they have to bolster the roster of Smackdown if they're going to make it work.
Here is something that puzzles me, and believe me if it puzzles me, it is sure to make your head spin. Obviously there is a nitch for a program like ECW. It drew pretty well, and the buy rates were pretty good, I'm sure. It is the type of thing that doesn't necessarily take away from anything that McMahon is trying to do, and can only help him in the long run. Why doesn't Vince just give Paul Heyman a budget, say you can run ECW however you want, just as long as you stay under budget, and see what happens. Paul E. was obviously on to something with ECW, and fans are still passionate about it. Giving it a one night show doesn't really do it justice, and it deserves better. I mean it happens in entertainment all the time. Miramax is a division under the Disney corporation, as is Touchstone pictures. Dimension is a branch off of Miramax, and New Line is under Warner Brothers. Major groups such as Disney own tv stations, and they all act independently of each other. They all have to answer to one big boss perhaps, but they are all still run separate of each other. You will never see Pinhead in a Disney movie, or Quentin Tarantino directing the Love Bug, unless he gets to obliterate it or something. Leatherface will never show up with Dirty Harry, and you'll never see Michael Myers delivering the ABC news. So, why can't we have little branches off of the WWE brand and let them run their own way. We already have OVW and the like, so why not have ECW come back, run by Paul Heyman like it was, and see what happens. The worst case scenario is that it doesn't work, and Vince pulls the plug after a year or so. I think it would be fun, and it could be a great jumping off point for the Benoits and Jerichos of the world.
Saw the Longest Yard and loved it. I hate to admit it but Kevin Nash stole the movie. He was hysterical and he just kept getting funnier as the movie went along. Stone Cold and Goldberg were okay, although they really didn't stick out anymore than anyone else did. But Nash was just plain funny, and the best part of it is that it was a complete surprise. I knew he was in the movie, but since they usually like to show the best parts of the movie throughout the trailers, I figured that was going to be it. I had no idea that there were as many funny scenes in it as there were, and that Nash had so many of them.
The Wrestlemania 21 DVD was great. I finally got to watch most of the matches, and still Stone Cold in Piper's Pit was nearly the sleeper. It was as close to an old Piper's Pit that we're going to get, and both men were at the top of their game. Piper still was better, because he was able to outlast and outwit the entire audience with their whole tepid "What" chant. He is one of the few that actually got them to shut up for a minute when he asked them "What you can't understand him either?" The other thing I liked about the disc was they put the Hall of Fame inductions on as an extra rather than buying as another DVD, which was a great idea. I was going to have to go out and buy the Hall of Fame DVD, just to see what all Piper did, but their sales of previous Hall of Fame DVDs must have forced their hand. It was a nice bonus to get that package.
Another new set of DVDs just came out, starring a bunch of wrestlers from the eighties. It's put out by the WWE "Superstars of the 80s" Hogan, Piper, Flair, Slaughter, Snuka, and a few others are on the 3 disc set. I watched the Piper portion so far, and it looks like it's pretty well put together. My only beef with it is each portion on the wrestler is a little short, although informative, and they don't have many matches, considering the number of stars they are covering.
When is the WWE going to put out a collection of Roddy Piper's stuff? They could do a disc on his interviews and Piper's Pits, another on his matches outside the WWE (NWA, Portland, WCW, and Florida/Georgia career), and another disc for his WWF/WWE matches. I think it would be great, and they would certainly never run out of material.
Well, that's about it for now, so until I get a call from Heather telling her how much she really hates me.....keep reading, sincerely the Novak Notebook
And there hasn't been so much of a peep out of the Novak Notebook. Normally, I would say the notebook has taken the time off and relaxed, but right now I'm working nights and barely know which end is up most of the time, so I haven't exactly been relaxing.
There has been a lot of things going on over on the wrestling scene, and should get even more exciting in the coming months. RAW has been entertaining and fun to watch, and there have even been a few things on Smackdown worth tuning in too.
RAW has been great, everything from the unexpected retirement of Chris Jericho, to the news that RAW is finally going home, back to the USA network.
Chris Jericho retiring has been a surprise to say the least. I love how they did it and how they handled it. Chris said he was tired of wrestling, and his interests were elsewhere. That's nice and wonderful and I wish him well, but I also happen to think that when he says wrestling wasn't interesting to him anymore, you can read into that he was tired of being used in the second tier. His career started off with a bang when he appeared opposite of Undertaker and the Rock. But the majority of his career, he was basically a glorified midcarder, which didn't make any sense. He didn't miss much time when he was with the WWE, and he was a huge personality, yet he barely registered in the title hunt year after year. It's such a shame, because he is a great talent, and maybe a few years away, he could come back and be even more popular than ever. Who knows, he may even be used correctly.
I also love the title holders switching shows. Batista is a monster, but he would've just bullied Bishoff around. He gives Smackdown a much needed boost, and he really doesn't have to do a whole lot. Cena on the other hand, gets to show off his talent a little more, being on cable he can let loose a little, and with his feud with Bishoff, he can be even a little more interesting. It is a poor man's McMahon v Austin, but it's better than what they had, which was squat. My only question is whether or not HHH is coming back to feud with Cena or finish what he started with Batista.
RAW on the USA network is great for two reasons. One, they go back to where they started and the rules aren't as bad over there. Next is they can maybe go back and grab some of their audience they lost when they left for Spike TV. The other great thing about this is Spike is going out and getting TNA, which will be great for us who haven't seen the product yet. I'm excited and I can't wait to watch their programming. I don't care if they don't have the starpower, but I just want to have someone else to talk about other than the WWE. Maybe the notebook will go back to being something around monthly of bi-monthly if both programs pick up the pace a little.
HHH is coming back. I'm actually glad, although I love what Kurt Angle is doing right now as the top heel. But it was good to get rid of him for awhile, and it won't be bad to see him come back, as long as he doesn't flood the airways the way the NWO did back in the day. People loved it at first, but when you see it all the time, people get tired of it. Let's wait and see what happens.
Please get rid of the Diva search. It is stupid, a waste of time (Not only that, the girl I liked, Elizabeth I think didn't win). The WWE doesn't take the women seriously to begin with, and adding these girls doesn't help. It seems to me that the sole purpose of getting these girls in there is so they can get them into Playboy as soon as they can. Don't believe me, see Christy Hemme. Her fifteen minutes weren't even up yet, and she was already dropping her drawers for Playboy (not that there is anything wrong with that). But please stop wasting time when you could add another match or two. If you want to incorporate a Diva search, have them escort the wrestlers down, and then get into it at ringside.
Benoit has a belt again, and that is a good thing. Not only that the whole angle with Orlando Jones is hilarious, allowing Benoit's comedic side to come out. A great idea.
What happened to Piper's Pit? One Pit and he gets kicked by Shawn Michaels? What's up with that?
Why is Hogan still around?
The New Legion of Doom is growing on me. Having Paul Ellering at ringside wouldn't be so bad, but they could put Stacy Kiebler at ringside too. Use the women as valets rather than in pillow fights.
Well, that wraps this up for now...so when you think you know everything.....turn around and there is probably someone laughing.....hang loose, but hang on tight....
WWE homecoming was billed as something of a ppv for free. You got to see all the major stars, past and present, and see them doing some of the things they do best. This is only going to be good for the WWE to head back to the USA network. Although the commercials were a bit tiresome, the show itself was a major success.
Unfortunately, I didn't get back from work in time to see the beginning of the show. Naturally, that is when they had the Piper's Pit on. I got back in time to watch the rest of the Kurt Angle, Shawn Michaels match. It was great to watch, but the problem with an iron man match on television is that you lose some momentum once you go to commercial. Still, it is fun and with two top performers like Michaels and Angle, it works really well.
Showing all the greats was a wonderful thing, although the one shot showed Greg Valentine looking more than a little bored, or drunk. When they were in the ring that was even better. For us old guys who remember back to the heyday of the eighties, it was fun to see some of these guys that you haven't really seen in maybe five to ten years.
The best thing of the night was Austin stunning the entire McMahon family. It was hilarious, especially when Linda came out and agreed with Steve that her husband was a piece of trash. She messed up her stunner, and the skit was too long at times, but overall very good. My only complaint was why didn't they really let Shane say anything? Is he now the black sheep of the family I wonder?
Hogan challenging Austin is interesting for the fact that you have the biggest draw of the eighties vs the biggest draw of the new millenium. Both are hurt, well past their prime, but both of them can cut a promo better than half of the people the WWE has under contract right now. The whole locker should watch when these two start cutting into each other. If they didn't pay attention when Michaels had his run against Hogan, they should really pay attention now.
I actually like the angle they played against Smackdown. I didn't really want to watch a 6 man tag match that didn't mean much of anything. They all got their pops, and they got their legs cut out from underneath them. It set up a far better angle at the end, and maybe even something later on down the road.
Now for some short points from a short man.......
When did Trish become a face again? Did I miss something?
Ashley almost became a hero by nearly taking off Candace's underwear along with her tights. That would have been a hell of a return to the USA network don't you think?
More Piper's Pit........please
Now that the WWE has moved, can't wait for TNA to get it's footing on the Spike network. Out of everyone who moved to the Spike network (ECW, WWE, and now TNA) this should benefit TNA the best. ECW was hurt by the censorship, and it really limited what they could and couldn't do. The WWE didn't learn from ECW and did the same thing. TNA can manage to gain a bigger audience, without making the same sacrifices either of the other two had to make. They should be able to function a lot better, and at least let more people know what their product has to offer. If they decide to start taking risks and chances, by then they will hopefully be big enough where they may be able to move to another network.
Movies to see......Into the Blue (Jessica Alba is hot)
Movie to rent......Prophecy:Uprising. .....continuing the Prophecy franchise without Christopher Walken, this is a cool little straight to DVD movie. Don't expect a whole lot, but it is fun to watch.
Book to read......Bobby Heenan's Chairshots......it's his new book, kind of a guide to wrestling and equating it to life. Pretty good read and fun too. The title was a little too long to write the whole thing.
Well...that's all I got to say about that.....so keep reaching for them stars, and you'll either pull a muscle or have people asking you when you were robbed
It's been awhile since I've written. I am now safely tucked away back at my apartment in Pittsburgh, after my six months in Cleveland. A lot has happened, and I've even been able to start cleaning my apartment, which is a chore in and of itself. But in between the mounds of garbage I'm throwing out, I have been able to watch some wrestling and even write another Notebook. I know how you all sit on the edge of your seat waiting for another notebook to come out, or not, and I am more than happy to oblige.
First and foremost, even though Smackdown has improved some, I still have the feeling that I'm watching the JV when I tune in Smackdown. Switching to Friday nights hasn't helped me either, as I keep forgetting until the last minute. What I have caught, you start realizing they only have five or six top shelf guys and everyone else is fighting for tv space. JBL, Batista, Mysterio, Undertaker, Orton, and maybe throw in Benoit and Booker T. There isn't much beyond that, which is a shame.
What is the end story for Bishoff? It should be interesting to see if they bring him back and see how they bring him back if they do. Despite everything, I liked Bishoff as the gm, and I really liked his interaction between Bishoff and Austin. That was great.
Just watching Kurt Angle, and he is the best thing that the WWE has going on right now. Despite HHH trying to be the biggest heel right now, Angle is the man right now. I love the feud between Angle and Cena and I wish they would go on for some time.
Christy Hemme got fired. I hope Stacy Keibler isn't next. I liked Christy and she was actually getting to be a bit better in the ring. I like some of the women on the WWE shows, and I think they could do a lot with them, but I think it wille eventually fall by the wayside, like everything else does.
HHH hasn't thrown himself right into the mix in search of another title, but you know that's coming. I think he's starting to realize that he can take the title, hold it forever, but it only counts as one title reign. So maybe we'll be getting some smaller reigns, and maybe do somemore chasing as he closes in on Ric Flair's magic number. The funny thing is, he can be the one to have a seventeen time title reign to his credit, but all of his reigns combined will be overshadowed by Steve Austin's, Rock's, and maybe even John Cena's. No matter what he does, he will always be remembered as a man who slept his way to the top.
I just caught Santa's Slay the other day on DVD. Even though Goldberg is no longer in wrestling, I just thought I would bring it up anyway. It was actually a pretty funny movie, from the beginning where Santa wipes out James Caan and Fran Drescher. Then Santa gets nasty. What they did is take the Santa mythology and turn it on its ear. What they did is make Santa the son of Satan (get it?) and he makes a bet with an angel(in the form of a human) 1000 years ago that he can beat him in any game. He loses so he has to be nice and deliver presents for 1000 years. Well, the thousand years is up and Santa comes back pissed off. It was also fun to see Robert Culp in the movie as well.
Now on to more important news. Stacy Keibler is going to be on the new dancing with stars show. Think I might watch? Hmmm, Stacy in nice little outfits, dancing all around the dance floor? She might not be on wrestling tv, but I am going to try and get my fix of Stacy every week, that's for sure. Okay, I guess that might be too much Stacy(although I don't think that's possible).
Now for some of my recommendations for now;
movies to catch in theatres:
movies on DVD:
Book to read:
Cd to catch......
Carrie Underwood's CD is good....it is a solid CD for a debut and not only that, she is an adorable blonde with great pipes. What more do you want?
Well, until later....if you're really nice maybe I'll tell you the real reason the three wise men were late to the stable. Sincerely, the Novak Notebook.
Will be heading out on the road again, after some much deserved time off. Since I don't know whether or not I will have wrestling, let alone internet access. So, I will try and discuss as much as possible in whatever time I have left before I leave. So sit back, buckle in and enjoy Novak Shots.
Does anyone miss Chris Jericho? I know I do, but I don't miss him the way the WWE was using him. He was an extremely talented wrestler and after he was the first undisputed champion, he got caught up in the middle of silly midcarder feuds. He is great on the mic, a million times better than Edge, and he was wonderful in the ring.
Now that RVD has proven two of my friends wrong by coming back at the Royal Rumble. The real question is, what is he coming back to? He hasn't exactly said the nicest of things about the WWE and HHH while he's been off, starting with the ECW pay-per-view and getting worse from there on out. Vince McMahon has a tendancy to make people pay for things they say about him in public. Don't believe me? Remember Goldberg? How about the NWO return? Remember anyone else who said anything about him and then tried to come back? McMahon was going to have Austin lose to Coach? So I would tell RVD to be very careful when he comes back, otherwise he'll be losing to Gregory Helms every night.
Divas Lingerie magazine and probably a swimsuit magazine is sure to be coming out soon. Can hardly wait, but I do have one question; with all the turnover in the Diva section, are they going to have to toss out most of the shots they took. I mean, they take these girls and do the shoots, then the girls leave. Just wasted a whole bunch of money if you asked me. If you look at the Diva magazines just three or four years ago, most of those girls are gone. Ivory, Miss Kitty, Jaqueline, Miss Jackie, among others are no longer there. If you consider the attrition of the top talent, that seems to be on par with the men as well. Think about it and guys like Jericho, Rock, Austin, Brock Lesnar, and others are gone too. I think the WWE is going to have to realize sooner or later that they aren't going to have the long term success with the same talent over the years. No longer is it going to be Hogan, Hart, Michaels, Piper and Savage for ten plus years. People are going to come and go much more than they used to, and I think the fans are going to have to get used to having wrestlers getting pushed higher much faster than they used to, because the window of opportunity is much smaller than it used to be.
I like the idea of the WWE getting the belt off of Cena right now, because there is starting to be a bit of a backlash against him right now. It was kind of similar to when Hogan had a few of his long runs with the belt, and people were just cheering anyone to get the belt off of him, because they were sick and tired of him. I started into wrestling and really got into the feud between Piper and Hogan, cheering for Piper because I got tired of Hogan really quickly. You can't have your top face getting booed rather soundly, because it screws everything up. Give Edge a small run, and then turn it over to someone else down the road. On the same page, I love when Cena told everyone who doesn't like him they could just kiss his ass. He needed to say something like that, because he's saying that he isn't going to change. The WWE has to remember that the character of John Cena only appeals to certain people, and it really doesn't appeal to a lot of older wrestling fans. Hip hop doesn't appeal to everyone, but at least Cena seems like the type of guy that people don't have a real problem with behind the scenes. So he will be given a long rope, but the WWE may have to do something along the lines of what they did with the Rock. Rocky Maivia was a nice guy, got booed like crazy and they turned him into the Rock.The fans loved it even when they hated the Rock, and Cena may have to head down that same road. It may have started with him saying he wasn't going to change, so we'll have to wait and see.
I saw a preview for Kane's movie before Hostel. All I have to say is that Santa's Slay looks alot better. Also, if this is the type of movie the WWE is going to be putting out, they won't be putting out too many movies.
Terry Funk is in The Ringer. He plays some muscle, and he doesn't have too many things to say. Overall it still looks like a better performance than Kane.
Stacy Keibler made it through the first round of Dancing with the Stars, and she looked amazing doing it. Hopefully, she'll be on for quite some time.
TNA has a major problem. Many of my friends are huge wrestling fans and they are looking for anything to watch other than the WWE. They were watching TNA for a little while, yet at the pay-per-view the other night (New Year's Revolution) they were saying they were tired of TNA and were never watching again. The reason being after TNA hyped up Rhyno, he got squashed by Jeff Jarrett in about five minutes for the title. Big problem. Double J has to realize he is not going to be able to carry this company for any length of time if they want to remain solvent. It's nice that he thinks of himself so highly that he keeps putting the belt around his waist, but he doesn't realize most people see him as a man who lost a belt to Chyna. He's a high mid-carder at best. However, every time you turn around he has the belt around his waist, and that is a major problem. He's being compared with HHH and Hogan, but he doesn't have the popularity or fan awareness of either of those two. It's going to be interesting to see if Jeff realizes he can't be champ as many times as he's been if TNA wants to continue.
Now for picks, and other stuff......
Movies......Hostel is okay and brutal. Fun with Dick and Jane is cute, unless you don't have a job. Munich is interesting but I was far more fascinated with the character after he realized he went from the hunter to the hunted. The Ringer with Johnny Knoxville and the gorgeous Katherine Heigl is funny. The metally challenged members of the cast are great and they have some of the best lines.
DVDs......The entire Flash series is on DVD. Overlooked but a very good show that should've been on a lot longer. Evil Breed:the legend of samhain is a horror movie, but it stars porn divas Jenna Jameson, Ginger Lynn (Allen) and Chasey Lain. What more could you ask for except maybe Teagan Presley, Shayla Laveaux and Juli Ashton (the last two were in the very funny Orgasmo).
No new CDs or Books for you guys, so you are on your own there. So until I start reporting for the cheese state, keep reading...sincerely the Novak Notebook.
And possibly some incoherant thoughts, but for the most part the Notebook has been striking some sense of heightened awareness with everything he says. Now I've been watching wrestling as much as I can, although it is interfering with the show 24 lately. I will try and educate all of you as much as I can, and I hope you will all gain something from my musings.
Stacy Keibler is still on dancing with the stars, and she is doing amazing. My jaw just about dropped to the floor a few weeks ago with her sizzling performance, and she has gotten hotter and better since. Besides, you get to watch her every week in either a short or skin tight outfit. What more do you want?
Now after my drooling, I mean my observation, I shall move on to the main topic of discussion. Has anyone heard what the Rock's latest movie is going to be? Has there been any hype at all for the Rock's next big movie? I didn't think so (Btw: I think it's Spyhunter, but I could be wrong for the first time). What is the reason? Hmmmm, could it be that Doom didn't do well. It didn't even make 30 million really, and it cost a touch more than that to make. It comes out on DVD the Tuesday after the Super Bowl in an unrated format (which could lead me on another tirade about unrated DVDs actually having only a minute or two footage of dialogue. Since it wasn't seen by the MPAA, it has to be unrated). The Rock better hope the movie does extremely well on DVD, because it was a flop otherwise.
Have you noticed that since the Rock has distanced himself from the world of professional wrestling, the fans seem to have distanced themselves from him? His movies have been on the decline in grosses since the Scorpian King, and he hasn't broke 50 million with anything since the Rundown I believe. His movies have been going down a slippery slope faster than Paris Hilton in a hotel room. A few of his movies have been pretty good, but the wrestling fans have not been making his movies must see anymore. Just goes to show you that fans are a fickle bunch and once you are out of the public eye, the fans move on. Mick Foley understood this after a few of his books didn't sell as well as his first two, which is one of the biggest reasons why he pops up every now and then.
Don't believe me? Hulk Hogan hung around long enough to get to promote his show Hogan knows best, and promote his daughter somewhat, and his cable show becomes a high rated hit. He disappears, the WWE stops promoting the show, and do you hear about it anymore? Bret Hart even made up long enough to get his DVD out there and make it a best seller. Still don't believe me? I say that Kane's little horror movie does almost as much business as Doom did. Just because the WWE reaches a certain audience and a good number of those fans will at least turn out for the movie. They figure that they are supporting the WWE (which they are since the movie is under the WWE production company) with their ticket buys, so they will tend to turn out. The Rock left the WWE, and even though he didn't turn his back on the WWE fans, that's how some of them see it.
This isn't to say that the Rock is finished, because all it takes in Hollywood is for one hit, then you roll on to the next one. The thing is that the Rock had better get a hit on his list of things to do, and he better make it quick. If he doesn't, he'll be the next Van Damme or Segal, making movies that go straight to DVD.
Now on to some other little tidbits of information.
The women of wrestling are the feature of the new Celebrity Skin magazine. They go through many of the current stars, and a few of the older ones, but I was totally surprised because they had one big omission. Sunny. She was sort of the woman who started the whole Diva thing. Does anyone really remember that she was the manager of Skip and Zip? That she managed the Road Warriors? Everyone remembers her though, no matter who she managed. She isn't even in the magazine yet she was the breakthrough for women in the old WWF. Not that I bought the magazine for the pictures, just for research purposes.
I guess I should probably start talking about wrestling somewhere along the line huh?
I love Chris Benoit, and I sort of like the feud they are putting him in with Booker T. I just wish it were for the heavyweight title, instead of the US Belt. There's nothing wrong with the US Title, but until Kurt Angle got hold of the title, the heavyweight picture was rather boring. I don't even mind if they would've had Benoit go bad, but I think it would've been a lot more interesting if Batista, JBL, Benoit, and Booker T would've been in the title hunt. Now Benoit and Booker are on the under card, and JBL is fighting the Boogeyman (?), while Batista is hurt. Angle had to fight Mark Henry at the Royal Rumble, which made for a lot less exciting match, rather than have Angle v Benoit. And what the hell is the thing with Orton subbing for Booker T? That was just odd.
Now I am the first to admit, I really liked Eddie Guerrero and thought he was a really great wrestler, but I was never his biggest fan. That's okay, because that's what makes America great. Every wrestler has their fans, and every fan has their favorites. I loved watching Eddie, but I love Benoit, Jericho, Undertaker, and some others. I loved Rey Mysterio and all of the crazy moves he used to do, before he got hurt several times in the old WCW. With all that being said, I was just as saddened as anyone could've been to hear that he had passed away. It was a shame, but what I don't understand is that he's getting a bigger push now than he was when he was alive. I understand some of what they're doing because by keeping his name in the picture, they're keeping his memory alive, yet the way they're going about it is pretty tasteless even for them. Orton trash talking a dead guy isn't exactly going to win him any humanitarian awards, and I'm not sure whether he's comfortable with it or not, but still, using a dead Eddie Guerrero as a way to start a feud between Mysterio and Orton is ridiculous. Just the fact that Mysterio has the title shot and everyone wants a crack should be motivation enough. I mean what's next? A dead Eddie Guerrero on a pole match? A casket match with a corpse in it? How low is this going to go?
The Boogeyman? I kind of like the idea, and I especially like the idea of him eating the tumor off Jillian's face. That was kinda cool, and she is hot so they had to get that "birthmark" off of her somehow, but I mean the guy can't wrestle. He does a mean electric slide, but he can't wrestle, so to have him squash someone like JBL doesn't make sense. They took forever to build JBL up and make him seem like a top level contender, which we weren't buying. Then in one fail swoop, they topple him rather quickly to a new guy who can't wrestle. Way to treat your top level talent. What's his name? JBL or Jericho? I forgot.
Getting back to Eddie Guerrero, the tribute shows were amazing, and even though I knock HHH alot, I give him and JBl big ups for their matches (and clean losses) to Chris Benoit and Chavo Guerrero respectively. I'm sure there were other motives behind why HHH did what he did, but it was still a cool thing. It was even more impressive for JBL because Chavo isn't even in the same league as Benoit, even though JBL isn't even close to HHH's stature. Either way, it was a classy gesture by both guys and everyone showed their true emotions. Truly a special time for a special guy.
Well, that about wraps up another edition of the Notebook, hope you enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed writing it. So until Stacy Keibler has a wardrobe malfunction on her show, keep reading, sincerely the Novak Notebook.
I don't believe I have ever written an entire notebook about one topic. With that being said, don't expect it to change here. In fact I'm going to, how you say, write outside the box, or at least write outside of the world of wrestling for some, if not a good bit, of this article. Whether or not I tie it into wrestling is entirely up to me, so here's to the ride at least.
Let's all make a pact to not go hunting with Vice President Dick Cheney. Not only will you get mistaken for a quail (no, not former Vice President Dan Quayle, who oddly enough was Vice President under George's dad), but there will be no charges filed. It's kind of the mantra of the whole administration. Do whatever you want, break as many rules and laws as you want, say you're doing it for the people, and get away with it. I find it rather sad that the former President lied about getting his candle waxed in the White House and they wanted him impeached, meanwhile this one lied to start a war, among many of his lies, and he gets re-elected. Both were bad, but don't you think having thousands die because of your lie is just a tad worse then getting a blowjob from someone other than your wife?
HHH recently said that since he is involved with the daughter of the boss he has to work harder. Now before you know what you think I'm going to say, I'm going to totally confuse you (in case this sentence didn't do that already). I'm sure on some levels HHH does have to work harder, because McMahon has already went to him and said that he is something of a clubhouse leader so he has to show the others how to do it. So I'm sure there is a little more pressure put on him to perform. However, he has, for the last five years or so, gotten way more special consideration than anyone else in the company. Don't believe me? Look at the track record of the ppvs and see how many he was either the main event or close to it. Most of them, unless it was a Smackdown ppv, or during the time when he was off the air. He has headlined quite a number of Wrestlemanias and has held the belt longer than most during the last five years. As I've stated before, he is forcing his name in the record books along with guys like Hogan and Flair for most title reigns. He will never be in the same league as those guys though. He is the best example of a man who has backstage power, uses it to his fullest advantage (remember when he wouldn't do that many house shows a few years ago) and walks away saying he works harder than anyone. Not only that, he manages to cleanly win over his competition, which ticks a lot of people off, because he is supposed to be a heel.
Who wants to bet me that HHH gets the belt from Cena at Wrestlemania?
Where oh where did Chris Jericho go? Oh where oh where can he be? Well, he would've been a top man if it weren't for HHH. Remember all the battles they had where HHH was cleanly pinning him (Kinda like what he did to RVD)? I'm sure Jericho saw his future as nothing more than a HHH lackey, didn't want any part of it and left. He probably figured he had a better shot at making it with his band Fozzy then he did making it to top level and staying at top level in the WWE.
I just went and saw Final Destination 3 when it came out not too long ago. The gore factor in it was pretty good, but unfortunately the Ali Larter factor was a little low. What I wouldn't give for her to dress up (or down depending on your point of view) in the whip cream outfit she wore in Varsity Blues, and then come knocking on my door. But FD3 got me thinking about some of the goriest movies of all time, and some of them weren't necessarily scary, but they were a fun time. Anyway, my top five gory movies of all time (in order).....
Dead Alive- A Peter Jackson film he made before King Kong and the Lord of the Rings movies. It has zombie monkies, intestines running around the house after people, and better yet....it is a romantic comedy. what more could you ask for, other than for Ali Larter in whip cream.
Re-Animator... A classic. It was brilliant in it's time, and even more so now. Considering the small budget they had to work with, it is a great little movie. Jeffery Combs is perfect as Herbert West, and then you have the yummy Barbara Crampton in it, getting naked three ways to Sunday. Oh yeah, you also have a pissed off head walking around with his body, trying to steal the formula from West, while trying to kill them as well.
Final Destination 2....It might not be the classic horror movie, or even a good one, depending on your point of view. But the gore is great, and it is pretty clever with the deaths in the movie. Some people argue that the deaths in the second and third one are a little too ridiculous to be believed, and I rethought that a little bit. I think they're supposed to be that way, to show that death is pissed off at these kids for skipping out on their appointments and death wants to show that these are no accidents and are unusually cruel for a reason. Oh yeah, Ali Larter is in it too.
Cannibal Holocaust...when this sucker came out, it struck so close to home, people thought it was real. Much like the Blair Witch project a generation or two later, it created a stir and became a cult classic. It can be pretty hard to watch at points, and you almost feel like you're watching a National Geographic special gone bad.
Now I'm going to cop out and mention a few different movies for different reasons.
Saving Private Ryan..because of the first half hour
Did you know at one point Robocop was going to be rated X for violence? They hadn't come out with the NC-17 rating yet, but they were working on it. The director wanted to release it as X, which would've marked the first time since Midnight Cowboy that a mainstream movie would've been released with the X rating, but the people at Orion convinced him that they couldn't sell it that way. Most theatres (especially if they are in or near a mall) cannot show an X or unrated movied or now NC-17 movie because of their lease stipulations. That and the bombing of Showgirls (oddly enough by the same director) is why you don't see more NC-17 movies.
Now, what does all of this gore in movies have to do with wrestling. Not much of a direct correlation, I will admit, but I do have to point out that gore does sell. Mick Foley has made a career out of it, and guys like Dusty Rhodes and Rick Flair have bled so often that you touch their foreheads and they'll start to bleed. They came out with the Steel Cage match, then Hell in a Cell, then ECW came along which thrived on it and raised the gore factor to another level, and then the Elimination Chamber. So, the question is what's next? In Japan they have it even further ahead than that, with exploding rings, broken light bulbs around the ring and whatnot. People can argue all they want about the technical aspects of wrestling, and while it is true that there was a lot of great wrestling in ECW and many of the better matches did not involve people getting bloodied beyond words, which matches do you remember most? Sabu and Funk in barb wire, getting shredded to pieces. Ian and Axle Rotten bloodied to the point you couldn't tell which was which. Bill Alphonso and Beulah (another yummy) with blood pouring out of Bill in buckets. Pretty much any match Tommy Dreamer and New Jack were in. Sandman and Raven. There was a lot of great wrestling (RVD v Jerry Lynn) but the blood is what sold the ECW to the hardcore fans. My question is where do they go now? Another thing is what do they do when people are clamoring for more. McMahon has a tendency to try and give fans what they want, but will it cost someone their career, or worse yet their life? Remember Rock v Foley in the "I quit match". We all thought it was great while we were watching it, but none of us realized how bad a beating Foley actually took until we saw "Beyond the Mat" and saw that gash in his head. These are the things the wrestlers are putting themselves through for us, and I have a feeling it's going to get to a point where you are going to hear about more deaths in the ring (or around it) than outside of the ring.
Just a little Pittsburgh thought that is kind of motivated by politics, money and greed.
We voted down a referendum a few years ago to fund the two new stadiums (Heinz Field and PNC Park) using taxpayers money via raising the sales tax a half a percent. The politicians built the stadiums anyway, saying they had the money. Over the next few years property assessments went through the roof all around Allegheny County, and I really doubt it was a coincidence. Now we are at another crossroads where the Penguins need a new arena and hooked up with a company that will pay for a new arena for free if they are awarded a slots license. Everyone thinks this is wonderful, because a slots license is going to be issued, and if they can build this arena without using public money, keep the Penguins here and rebuild one of the rundown communities where the place would be built, it would all work out well. However, the governor and his cronies around here are basically saying the Penguins better come up with a plan B, just in case. Now if you are like me and have an IQ above 50, you can pretty much read the handwriting on the wall. Now, here's a scenario that can happen under their watchful eye. Penguins leave, they build the arena anyway, because the building is a million years old. They try and attract a new hockey team, and maybe even a new basketball team. They spend millions of our dollars to tear down the old one, build up a new one and put in bids on new professional teams. Meanwhile, the new slots parlor is put in across the river from downtown Pittsburgh, in one of the most congested parts of town, with one road leading in and out (not kidding there) tying up traffic everywhere around there. This is their idea. My question is; how long ago did it stop being a country for the people and by the people? Thomas Jefferson once said that a country needed a revolution every generation or so to keep the flames of democracy alive. When you have a politician making a career out of politics, whereas the men who founded this country stepped aside to let others rule because they didn't want it to become a kingdom, maybe its time for a change.
Well, the Olympics are just about wrapped up as I write this. does anyone know or care? I bet I could get more people to name more of the American Idol contestants than they could Olympic medal winners. How wild is that?
Speaking of Olympic winners, what happened to Bode Miller? Did he do the big time choke or what? He says he really doesn't care about the medals, but I'm sure his sponsers care. How do you market this guy now? A five time loser that couldn't even make it into third in any of his races? Unfortunately he wasn't the only one who had that attitude, as it seemed apparent throughout most of the Americans "competing" at the games. Although a lot of critics hammered the Americans for their attitude, I have to strongly disagree with them. This has been a prevailing attitude in sports for nearly two decades now. It's been about me in team and what am I getting paid. It is just now trickling into the Olympics. Whether they finish first or last, they don't care as long as they get out there. How many Olympians have said that? Sasha Cohen falls down and said it's just four minutes of her life? Didn't she train years to get to that point. Jacobellis has a gold medal locked up, hotdogs it, falls on her cute ass and loses. You can say she won silver, but she really lost gold. She didn't seem disappointed and said she was doing it for the cameras. In fact, here's a sad state. She'll probably get more deals now, because people know who she is. How many other medal winners do you remember? Whose the lady who won the gold in the Giant Slalom or super G or whatever the hell she won in? You will remember Jacobellis though, simply because she made an ass (albeit a cute ass) out of herself. You remember Bode going 0 for 5. Michelle Kwan pulling out. Chad and Shawnee bickering like little girls. Johnny Weir being a little swan, girl or whatever. We remember the big disasters instead of curling, skiing, and more Winter Olympic medals than they've had been for awhile.
The one person I was routing for was Lindsey Kildow. She wiped out badly on a practice run. The doctors figured she was done for the Olympics, much less be able to walk for awhile. She was really, seriously hurt and if anyone could have had an excuse to not compete at their highest level, it was her. I was pulling for her, because she got up off of her hospital bed and went out and competed. Unfortunately, she never got a medal, but she went out and raced in every race she was supposed to. When asked about it, she said that was the spirit of the Olympics and that was supposed to be what it was all about. She was absolutely right, and she had a great mindset and she was cute too. Here was a girl who could've just limped away, nobody would've thought less of her, and instead went out, gave it her all (not getting paid...note to professional athlete whiners) and put everything she had into her performances. After she was seriously hurt, she didn't have a great chance to medal, but that wasn't the point to her. Her case was just going out and giving it everything she had, letting the chips fall where they may. Bode Miller didn't medal..but what type of performance did he give. Lindsey Kildow didn't medal, but her performance was heads and tails above any others there.
Now does any of this have to do with wrestling? Not really, but I'm going to stretch it to the point where it looks like a modern art sculpture to make it fit with wrestling. Wrestling hurt and wrestling in pain. Why? For the love of the fans. We don't know how many guys actually wrestle hurt and in pain, but keep pushing for the love of the fans.
We know HHH wrestled the rest of a match with a torn quad, which had to be amazing in the sheer pain he was experiencing. I tore my knee up years ago, ripping the ACL, MCL and the cartilage when I tried to catch myself from slipping and my leg looked like an L bending the wrong way. The pain was tremendous, and I nearly passed out driving my car back to my apartment. I couldn't have never finished a wrestling match. How some of these guys finish the match after getting a concussion, tear something, break something, and yet find it in themselves to finish what they started. You can say what you want about steroids, but when a baseball player pulls himself out of the lineup due to a hangnail, you have to give a wrestler credit for going out and performing with injuries, knowing it probably won't get better if they keep going out there. The wrestlers who don't take it seriously, well they perform about as well as Bode. They get forgotten about and go 0 for.
Now for some short notes from a short guy.......
Rumor has it that Stacy Keibler will have plenty of opportunities once she finishes dancing. I love Stacy, which I have well documented over the years, and she can shake her groove thing around me anytime. However, she is not willing to pose in Playboy (I have to applaud her for that, even though I am personally disheartened), I'm not too sure about her acting skills, because other than playing someone cheery or acting with really tall guys, I don't see her doing a whole lot of roles. She's really limited in what she'll be able to do acting wise, much like she was in some of those dances. I'm not sure she can sing, and other than hosting gigs for some shows here and there, what else is there?
Okay, so that wasn't so short.
Cena v HHH for title at Wrestlemania? Wow, who didn't see this coming?
Here is what I would've done for the Wrestlemania card.
Cena v Edge v RVD....triple threat match for title.
HHH v Big Show.....last man standing match
Angle v Orton v Mysterio...triple threat match for title
Trish v Candace v Torrie v Mickie.....woman's title, keep pinning until one left
JBL and Undertaker v Boogeyman and Mark Henry...I think this could work...kinda weird match, but four big men with no moves, I think it could work.
MNM v London and Kendrick, with Stacy Keibler marking her return as their valet....tag titles up for grabs
Kane v Masters....for Kane's part of tag title
Benoit v Booker T.......for title, loser has to wear winners t-shirt for 6 months
Sheldon Benjamin v Carlito....for title
Ric Flair v Foley.....after weeks of trashing Flair for being too old and not retiring, and for reminding Flair of how he was treated in WCW, Foley finally gets hands on Nature Boy.
Helms v Kash v Guido...triple threat for title
This is just a start, but I think this is already more interesting than what they have for their matches. You could always add more like a Hogan v Austin or something like that, but they already had these storylines set up and they were pretty cool ideas. I was really liking where the Big Show/ HHH feud was heading, and then they just killed it. I also love the Edge/Cena feud, and then they killed that too. Too many great ideas left off for Cena/HHH and Edge/Foley. Admit it, my Wrestlemania matches are a lot more intriguing and leave a lot more possibilities as to who might win.
well, that's about it for now, so until I report to you from Potsdam NY, tell me what you think about my potential Wrestlemania, and post on the board what you would like to see at Wrestlemania. Until Stacy shakes her booty so hard, her top falls off....keep reading, dreaming, and saying your prayers
>I give Edge big props for his match against Foley(who did great as well). I mean he was taking all kinds of shots, without a shirt on. I don't even want to go outside without a shirt on, much less fall onto a bed of thumbtacks . >I have no problem with Rey Mysterio winning the "heavyweight" belt (although it needs renamed now), but I still don't like the fact that they're doing all of this in the name of Eddie Guerrero. My friend pointed this out, and it is worth repeating (about the only thing he said I can repeat)...what does it say when you win a major belt, and someone elses wife and family come out to greet you, and the fans are chanting someone elses name, other than yours? >Mickie James is the greatest psycho woman since Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction. The best part is, her match with Trish was much more interesting than the match the men out on later. >For such a guy, Michael Douglas sure has been whipped in movies huh? Glenn Close, Sharon Stone, and Demi Moore. Hmmmm. Wonder what Catherine Zeta does to him when they are behind closed doors? >Speaking of Sharon (and no offense to 48 year old women), but when she was in her mid thirties and did what she did, it was different and hot and she was hot. Now she is still attractive, but to try and repeat that? At 48?? Hmmmm.
>Back to wrestling...
John Cena is going to be a heel while HHH is going to be a face? I don't know how that will play out, but it should be interesting. Cena is already getting booed out of every arena he shows up at, so having him turn heel isn't a big deal. He was a pretty good heel the last time, and he should be even better this time around.
The real question is whether or not HHH can pull off being a face. He doesn't exactly get a great crowd response when he gets out to the ring. I think he can pull it off, simply because he does get a better crowd reaction that Cena right now. He's a big name, talented and he does have some pretty good one-liners. But the smart fans know he plays back room politics, and they don't really favor that type of champion.
I like the fact they have three guys in the hunt for the championship. The other nice thing is it isn't two main guys, and someone else thrown into the mix, although at first glance it can appear that way. Edge is just as serious a contender as anyone else. He was a champ, even though it was only a month, but none the less, he was a champ. He is getting a huge push, gets great heat, and does great with a mic. It is nice to have someone else thrown into the mix, rather than just a match between HHH and Cena. Although it is a pretty safe bet that HHH will claim his next title, it does add a little extra to have Edge thrown into the match.
Actually having Rey Mysterio as the champ adds something unexpected I didn't think about; nearly anyone can win the title at this point. Kurt Angle, Undertaker, JBL, or anything like those guys are the natural frontrunners, but with Rey being the champ, that adds a whole bunch of people that wouldn't normally be considered. That adds a whole extra excitement to the matches.
Now for some odds and ends
>RVD getting a push? Who knew?
Well, that about wraps it up this time, so until Misty Mundae becomes a WWE Diva, keep reading .....sincerely the Novak Notebook.
First opinion has nothing to do with wrestling. It is about this whole relationship between the US and Mexico. It is a bit more covered out here more than back in Pittsburgh, for obvious reasons. I don't want to go into huge details, because this whole column would be about that and nothing about wrestling.
I have no problem with people who want to come into this country and make a better life for themselves. Who can blame them for something like that. Other than Native American Indians, everyone in this country is an immigrant of some kind, and this country was founded by people either being kicked out of their countries for their religious beliefs, or people looking for a better life. So other people coming in now, looking for a better life, I can't really blame them.
Those complaining that their relatives had to wait their turn might be true, but things change. Not only that, but I'm quite sure there was illegal immigration then as well. I think we need to monitor the people coming in and make sure that we are not getting criminals rather than people just trying to better themselves. I think we need to concentrate on two things. We need to look at the criminal element, and we might need to look at the way the laws are right now and possibly rewrite them. If someone comes into this country and commits a crime, unless they have diplomatic immunity, I think we need to prosecute them. Don't just send them back to their country, but charge them, and if they are illegal then make the penalties harsher for them. That is the price they pay. The other thing we need to look at is if the illegal aliens coming in are planning on becoming citizens. If they are, then we need to help them in the process, and if not maybe we need to look at what to do wit h them. Maybe they can be taxed, if they aren't being paid under the table, a little bit more as a sort of tariff for living here illegally. If the company found to employ illegals is paying under the table, then tax them a little differently. Don't take away the illegal aliens, but perhaps make them stop and think about hiring illegals to begin with. I'm sure there are other things we can look at, but is building a wall around the country really an answer? I mean this country can't even fix a highway during a summer, and you expect them to build and maintain a wall to keep people out? What is this East Berlin?
The other thing dealing with Mexico that just cropped up is their plan to allow small amounts of illegal drugs in the hands of its citizens, allowing their police to concentrate on dealers. While I don't like drugs and think they should remain illegal, I can't really find any problems with their ideas. Let's face facts, drugs are everywhere. If they weren't, we wouldn't have to teach ten year olds to say no. We're kidding ourselves if we think drugs are going away anytime soon, so the question becomes what should we focus on? The dealers or the users? I vote the dealers.
So here's the thing; under the new laws in Mexico, it would still be illegal to have the drugs, but there wouldn't be any jail time. It would be fines and penalties of that nature. It would free up the police to focus on the street dealers and the higher up dealers. Sounds like a plan to me. Free up the court system, the police and work on the people higher up the food chain. This country has done it for years when it comes to the Mafia. Give a lower level guy, who might have still killed a few people, a free pass if he gives up someone the government is looking for. Yet, who complains about this proposal? The United States. My thought is, oh well, too bad. It's their country they can do what they want, and if they think this plan will help them with the fight against drugs, so be it. We've come up with some pretty crazy laws ourselves, and we don't worry about what other countries say. But we stuck our nose in, saying it would encourage our kids to go down there on spring bre ak and do drugs (wait a minute, didn't we teach them to say no?). It's like the government isn't worried about the kids getting out of the country and drinking themselves to death during spring break, but doing some drugs legally could be a problem (as if the kids wouldn't find them if they were still illegal). Anyway, we cried, bitched and pressured the Mexican government and what do you know, the Mexican government now is looking at the bill again. Haven't we interfered in enough governments? Doesn't this smack of what the Russians did to other countries in the 1950s? What gives us the right to tell other countries what to do with their laws, even if they are our neighbors? Pretty arrogant if you ask me. But yet we keep throwing our weight around, oblivious to the fact that other countries hate us.
Now I could roll from this right into something about some of the wrestlers, but JBL already did that. He's gotten his heel back by ripping Rey and the fact he's from Mexico. It's pretty hard to miss, since it's tattoed on his abdomen. JBL took full advantage of the whole debate about illegal aliens and tore into Rey. It is a good ploy, and it will work well, but the problem with some of what JBL is saying is right. That is why he can't get a complete heel booing, because some of what he is spouting off about, the fans actually agree with. Rey is a fun champ, because he could lose to anyone, and that makes it interesting, but everyone keeps cheering for Eddie Guerrero. JBL had a great deal of respect for Eddie, and it showed once he died and JBL lost it. From all accounts, they seemed to be friends, if not close friends. So, JBL slams Rey, praises the good old days of JBL versus Eddie Guerrero, and half of the fans stop booing for a second and think 'he's right'. That doesn't help Rey at all, and especially getting beat up by Mark Henry doesn't help either. So far, they have treated Rey like they have treated their cruiserweight division over the years. It might be fun, but it doesn't matter. Right now it is obvious the WWE is focusing on RAW, and Rey is going to continuously get by on the skin of his teeth. The sad part about all of this is that after all is said and done about Rey's championship run, it will almost be like a second Eddie Guerrero run.
I just thought of something; the Undertaker better never get a divorce. If he does, I wonder who gets the tattoo on his neck? Come to think of it, how would you like to be his kid and have him telling you bedtime stories in that Undertaker voice? You would need therapy and never would sleep again.
HHH is in a new commercial, says one line and rips his shirt off. Wow, that was something wasn't it? You sneeze and you miss it. But seriously, I'm actually kind of looking forward to DX getting back together. Both men are stars, but they were great together and they actually did have some hilarious stuff together. It was a lot of fun, and it would be great to see what they could do now.
Joey Styles ripped the WWE and it was great. The only beef I had with it was that he and Lawler worked well together and there didn't appear to be any heat leading up to that night. All of a sudden Lawler gets snarky on Styles and Styles called him a hack. It was forced, and it should have been built up to more. I like Styles boiling over not being on Backlash, and they could've even complicated things by having Lawler torn between Ross and Styles, finally choosing Ross. They could tie everything back to when Lawler called it extremely crappy wrestling, and come full circle with it. Instead they did everything in one night, no build up to the Styles pop off. Although it was a great bit, I think it could've been better with at least a week or two of build-up.
Am I the only one waiting for this whole Kane on May 19th thing to be over? I mean how ridiculous can it get? Suddenly he has a problem with the date? Hasn't seemed to bother him all these years, and now to promote the movie, Kane goes apeshit over the mention of the date of the release. Didn't he know when it was coming out when Entertainment Weekly did their summer preview, or did he miss that issue? I mean, it's nice that they thought of something other than him coming out and talking about the movie, but why not have him hint there was something wrong on the set? He was spooked by something on the set, and it would climax on May 19th. Instead, he hears voices, has problems with the date May 19th, and goes after his former tag team partner, the Big Show (who still needs a new entrance theme). Instead of trying to convince people something happened to him on the set, and as the opening date gets closer he gets weirder, even getting the cast into it by having them tell storie s from the set, and then have it climax the week before the opening, we're getting this stuff. I'll probably go to the movie, and wait for it to crash and burn at the box office (although it will probably still do okay considering it is a low budget horror movie) so we can move on from this stupid gimmick. Maybe they can team up the voices in Kane's life with God that Vince booked, and they could have one hell of a tag team.
Now, I'm sure TNA is salivating at getting their hands on Randy Orton, and usually I would say they would have every right to be, but in this case I'm going to say something to Jeff Jarrett directly. I'm sure he reads this all the time, so I am appealing to you Jeff. Buyer Beware. He has had quite a number of problems since his time in the WWE, and the only reason the WWE has put up with him is his pedigree. They tolerated quite a bit from him, and I'm sure they would've put up with more except I'm certain people were starting to threaten to walk out of the WWE. So, they got rid of him and soon enough he will be a free agent. TNA can't wait, because he will be instantly a challenge to the title. The thing is though, Randy is used to the way things are done in the WWE, so how do you think he will handle the way things are in TNA? Things won't be the same and probably not what he is accustomed to in WWE. If he was unruly in WWE, what will he try and get away with in TNA? Probabl y anything and everything. So, Jeff it might be a good idea to get Randy Orton, but just be very very careful.
Chris Jericho has been on VH1's remember the 80s program, and he's listed as actor/musician. No mention of wrestler in there anywhere. I am beginning to wonder why all of these guys who leave (Rock, Jericho, Austin) try and distance themselves as far as they can from the very fanbase that were drawn to these guys to begin with. It really hasn't worked for the Rock to distance himself from wrestling, and would any of us heard of Fozzy if it wasn't for Jericho being a wrester. Fozzy would have just blended in with all of the other new bands trying to make it on the scene, and might not have survived to make it to its second album. I'm not saying these guys have to list wrestler first, but they need to remember where their populartity came from, and at least recognize the fans that put them on the map.
Now for my last point. I started to bring up something on the old message board that I will expound upon here. It's my column, I can do what I want. Anyway, I said that bringing back ECW is a great idea, in and of itself. However, I do have a caveat. Remember the One Night Stand ppv? I don't want repeats of that every time the ECW puts on a show. I'm not talking about the show itself, but the fact that all of the WWE wrestlers were up in the booths watching it. It needs to be seperate. It needs to be different from WWE. Basically, it needs to be allowed to be ECW. If Vince puts Shane or Stephanie at the head of ECW, it will be doomed from the moment it begins. It can't last if they try and put their WWE touches on it. Like I mentioned, just put Paul Heyman in charge. It worked before, and he has a great mind for that type of thing, so I don't see why it wouldn't work again. The only thing ECW had a problem with the last time was the tale nt raid by WCW and WWF and money handling problems inside the corporation. The first would be taken care of by the fact it is still under the WWE brand. The second could be handled by not putting Paul Heyman in charge in the money. Like I mentioned in the message board, Vince McMahon should just give Paul Heyman a budget, keep tabs on his spending, and let him run the company. Since the wrestlers are signed to WWE contracts, there won't be the problem of not getting paid, so there shouldn't be too much Paul Heyman has to worry about. I think it would work best to let Paul be in charge, pick the people he wants to help him run it, and let him run it. It won't be competing with the WWE, because it really didn't the first time around. It will compete with the TNA brand, and Vince would like nothing better than to get the best of TNA using ECW. He could not only claim to have squashed the TNA brand with WWE, but even to have beaten them with what he would view as the lesser ECW brand. That would be the ultimate triumph. I don't care why he's doing it, I just want to see it back and have some semblence of what it once was. It won't be if Vince interjects himself (which he will at first, which I understand. It needs that push to get started once again) time and again, and makes it WWE-lite. It needs to stand on its own, because the people who follow ECW will not stand for anything less. They won't take Mr. Socko, even if he is wrapped in barbed wire. They won't take RVD unless he's the whole F*&*'n show. Tazz will be Taz, and Sabu will be homicidal, suicidal, and genecidal. They won't accept anything less.
Until the Notebook gets another job and sweats his head off in Georgia or wherever he ends up...keep reading, sincerely the Novak Notebook.
Now, I was thinking the other day, which is unusual in and of itself, about breaking into the wrestling business. Before you wonder if the notebook has gone off the deepend, I'm not talking about me joining the ranks of the wrestling superstars. I was just thinking of people in general getting into the business. I was watching Kurt Angle marching down the ramp to the ring, and thinking back to his horrible camera presence doing local news in Pittsburgh. He was bland. He was boring, and he had no charisma whatsoever. You look at what he does in the WWE now, and you can't imagine him being as boring as dish soap on television. So, I began to wonder. If I were a young up n' coming wrestler, where would I want to start out my career? This is what I'm going to be exploring for awhile, so sit tight, relax and read on McGuff.
Now, this isn't the heyday of wrestling where guys could come in and make an immediate impact. Goldberg, Brock Lesnar, Rocky Maivia, and many others have come into a company (some even come in with it being their first experience in wrestling) and make a huge impact right away. That happens somewhat now, although the WWE tries a little too hard sometimes. Brock should've been pushed but not as far as fast as he was. And do I even have to mention Umaga? The thing about it is, you would think that the WWE would notice that when they give a huge push to a young guy climbing through the ranks, they inevitably have problems with him down the road. Do the names Brock Lesnar and Randy Orton come to mind? How about Batista with all of his injuries? Or Goldberg from WCW? All of these guys got pretty big pushes in early in their careers and it came back to bite everyone down the road.
So, if you're a young guy looking to make it big in the world of professional wrestling, you can look in three places. I will discount all of the independent circuits, not because I don't think they are viable, but because I really don't know them and most people getting into wrestling do not espire to work the independent circuits. It's kinda like baseball. While you may love the thrill of playing AA or AAA baseball, it in reality is just one step closer to your ultimate dream of making it to the big leagues. The independent circuits are a great way to hone a craft or a persona but most people view it as a starting point rather than something they can make a career out of. Besides, I don't know the independent circuits, and it would be silly of me to sit here and talk to you as if I had a clue what I was talking about. That all being said, I'm sticking with the WWE, TNA, and the newly reformed ECW to work with and from for my question.
Okay, so now you're someone with Kurt Angle's abilities, but you also have his persona before he got into wrestling. You're a nice guy, don't bother anybody and you happen to be mad skilled. Not a problem, because Kurt was faced with the very same question when he got into wrestling way back when. Only when he was looking around it was WCW, WWF and the old formed ECW. All of them were steamrolling, and all of them wanted a shot at an Olympic hero. Kurt had his choice, and we all know he chose the WWF. The question is if it were you would you have made the same choice, and who would you choose today?
So let's start by looking at the company Kurt eventually chose. He picked the WWF, so we'll look at the WWE and see if it would be a good idea for a young wrestler to try and break in through the ranks there. There looks to be plenty of upside and very little on the downside, but we'll look at it fairly close and examine as much as we can.
First the good about going with the WWE. They are a brand name, and have the biggest ppvs on television. They are a huge company with millions in reserve. Chances are good that if you have the talent, you will make it onto tv. Vince loves talent. If you have the skills you will be able to showcase it in front of a national audience and probably keep your job for years. Vince even has a knack for firing people and hiring them back, which doesn't happen everywhere else. The reward is higher and the chances of the company going under are remote, so stability is not really an issue. You also have a chance to work with great wrestlers and get ideas, tips and help from them to improve yourself, which is never a bad thing. Getting hurt is a big issue in wrestling, but Vince has been known from time to time to help out as much as he can, even if he doesn't have to, which can't be said for other companies. You have a chance to be brought in immediately and work a major program, ma ybe get boosted up the ranks rather quickly and establish youself as a household name before anyone knows what happened.
There are downsides to the McMahon brand. One is the cliques. Now there are cliques everywhere but in wrestling they can be especially harmful. If you're not established and you're not on McMahon's side, you have a long road to climb. As for getting covered while injured, well the fact you're going to be working a lot more gives you a greater chance of getting hurt. Stability is not an issue, but you're stability might be. The WWE has a tendency to push someone for awhile, then bury them in mid or lower card matches for a long time. Don't believe me? Ask Eugene, or Chris Jericho. Val Venis came in smoking but faded over time. The other issue is the McMahon's determine who is hot and worth pushing and who isn't worth the time of day. True, sometimes they listen to the audience, but your livelivhood is literally in their hands. If you get on their bad side, or they don't like your character, or they feel you are not connecting with the fan base, then you are going to be bur ied for a long time. While it is true that paydays can be quite a bit higher in WWE than in any of the others, one has to remember that Vince is a business man first and many times he feels like he is negotiating against himself, so he feels he is holding an edge. If he thinks he has you cornered you will not get a break. If he feels you are not working with the audience, you will definitely not get a break. Why do you think the Spirit Squad has hung around even this long? Sure it is the dumbest gimmick to come along since the Mountie, but people boo loud and long when they come out so they are getting that reaction. Why do you think Snitsky is reduced to working with Goldust in losing tag matches? He seems to have a persona and some talent, but he just doesn't connect with the audience the way the Spirit Squad does, so he doesn't get the push. Also, one has to remember that there are some glass ceilings, roofs, elevators, and paneling in the WWE. You're going to go as far as they want you, or as far as they think you should. That's it. And if they saddle you with a dumb gimmick (ala Eugene, Spirit Squad, Umaga, the Mexicools, Viscera and many more) you are going to get on tv, be made a fool of eventually and get buried in matches that don't mean much. Honestly, what does Mabel have to do with Viscera when he turned to the darkside? Even if you buy that transition, what does Vampire-like Viscera have to do with the big love machine? Guess about as much as Papa Shango does with the Ho-train.
So, you looked at WWE and like what you saw generally, and you wander on over to see what you think of TNA. You have a lot of talent, so TNA can use you immediately, and most likely you will shoot to at least upper mid-card for awhile. The stage isn't as big so you have time to perfect your persona and show what you can really do. They are on television, but they aren't as watched as WWE. That could work in your favor though, because there isn't going to be as much pressure on you to hit the ground running. This can work to your benefit as you can take your time and perfect your craft. You are still working in front of an audience, so you will get to work on how you carry yourself. If you blow it here and there, not nearly as many people are watching as they are the WWE, so if you misstep here and there it isn't as severe to your career. Don't believe me, ask the Shockmaster after he fell over in WCW and his mask came off. However, you are working with a young company, more li kely to allow you to take risks, and be creative with the unusual ring. Some possibility here.
Of course you have the Jeff Jarrett factor in TNA. He's not Vince McMahon, but the problem is he wants to be. He has a lot of control, stroke and say so, and you better kiss his ass. You have a lot of chances for advancement, but the pay isn't going to be nearly as good as it is in other venues. The workload might not be as harsh, but if you are in the X division, and probably are going to get hurt and since they are new and haven't developed any stability yet, it is probably going to be harder on you when you aren't working. You can develop a person there, but you also tend to play in front of the same audience night after night, so it is hard to determine whether the persona will travel well to other areas of the country. There is a lot of potential with TNA, however there is also potential for disaster. Remember, WCW went under pretty quickly after Turner left it, so TNA can be a sinking ship down the road too.
The last one of course is ECW. This isn't going to be the ECW I watched for all of those years but a newer ECW. Now, if you're a young guy trying to break in, this might be the place to be. You probably won't have to worry about mic skills, and work on those as you go. Since it is affiliated with WWE, Vince is going to keep his eye on it for talent he can bring over to the "big leagues". You will be able to let loose and have a good old time beating people up and being watched by a rabid fan base who lives for these types of shows. It could be the perfect place to springboard a career, because it looks like the genius Paul Heyman will be in charge, but he won't be the one behind the money which is even better.
Ahhh, everything old is new again. How about the new Cleveland Browns? The new baseball team in Washington DC, or the football team that replaced the Oilers in Houston? Remember when Hank Aaron returned to Milwakee or Babe Ruth to Boston, or even Willie Mays to New York so they could finish their careers where they started? How did all that work out? Remember when they did a new Mission:Impossible show, or a return to Gunsmoke? Those worked out well too right? Just because something returns doesn't mean it is going to be bigger, better and badder than it was the first time around. Don't believe me (you guys don't believe a lot I have to say)? All you need do is look at ECW the first time around. They were supposed to take off once they made it on national tv, and it turned out to be the final blow to their small but successful run. They weren't better on national tv than they had been on local broadcasting for a number of reasons, and they were never the same afterwards. Now that they've been away all of this time, how much of the old magic can they recapture. Fortunately, they can try and get a bunch of the people back who made them famous the first time around, but they had better be careful there. If they bring too many back, it's going to look like a Brady Reunion movie and people will tune out, saying I've seen it before and it was better before. Why would it have been better before? All you need do is look at the return of Terry Funk, and realize all of these guys have aged. Funk, Sandman, Raven, Sabu, Foley, New Jack, and the Dudleys can do some of the things they used to but not to the levels we have seen from them in the past. Paul is going to have to walk a fine line of bringing back some of the original players like Shane Douglas, Justin Credible, Mike Awesome and some of the ones mentioned above, and infuse a whole bunch of new talent that is willing to take the big risks that some of these guys can't take anymore. Anothe r thing is Paul Heyman might have Vince's pocketbook, but he's also going to have Vince as a boss, and Heyman has shown he does not really play well with others. He could get into some squabbles and heated discussions with Vince. As long as ECW is making money for Vince, he may not push too hard, however if things turn, Vince could very easily pull the plug on the whole thing. He could turn off hardcore ECW fans by having too much of a WWE influence over the product, and once again if Heyman and Vince go at it, Vince could simply replace Heyman with Stephanie or Shane McMahon.
So, ECW could have a potential to make a break out star, and probably have a better chance of making one than TNA would. Afterall, how many wrestlers who got their first big break in TNA does anyone really know? The Alpha Male Monty Brown (who most people think is a waste) and Abyss, who seems like a cool character. The problem with that is the same as with the Undertaker. If you leave, you can't take it with you. The X division has created a host of potential stars, but the reason for that is Vince never has and probably never will take the cruiserweight division seriously, which is a shame. Fallen Angel Christopher Daniels has true star quality, and there are several others who could be huge as well (No it isn't a Samoa Joe joke). But overall, TNA has done a bit of what WCW was doing shortly after its NWO success. Bringing in near stars or over the hill stars and giving the fans another look at them. They brought back Hall, Nash, Waltman, Sting, and even Piper here and there. Then they got Jeff Hardy and Christian and let them move up a bit. Christian can do that, but they are having as many problems with Hardy that the WWE was having, but they don't have nearly the talent to cover it up.
ECW could be huge, or it could go down in a blaze of glory. Sad to say but quite a bit of it depends on how Paul Heyman does and how he and Vince get along. Vince has been known to work quite well with people he didn't get along with, as long as the end result was profitable. For someone young it could be great to go to ECW and be there to rebuild something special, and be a cornerstone. It will be national tv, albeit quite a lot less pressure than even Velocity at this point. You will be seen and you will get a chance, but it could be pretty volatile for some time. It could be a risk worth taking however.
The WWE is a tough nut to crack and stay at the top for any length of time. Guys like Val Venis, Goldust, the Boogeyman, come in with the hype and not too long afterwards are barely hanging on to their careers. Another thing is that Vince does not like to take wrestler who made a name for themselves elsewhere and keep them there with his company. Think about all the wrestlers who were WWF/WWE champs since Hulk Hogan. None of them who held the belt for any length of time was a star before they got to the WWE save two. Mick Foley had quite a following in Japan and especially in ECW before coming to the WWE as Mankind. But guys like Stone Cold, HHH, the Rock, Angle, Cena, Bret Hart, Yokozuna, Shawn Michaels, Undertaker, Randy Savage and Diesel may have gotten started outside the WWE, but they made a name for themselves in the WWE. Others like Goldberg, Sid Justice(Vicious), Jericho all held the belt for brief periods of time and others like Benoit and Guerrero held it a litt le longer, but they were mid-carders where they were before. The only other man to hold the WWE title after he was a star somewhere else was Ric Flair, and that should go without saying. There was no way Vince could avoid giving him titles and title shots without making his company look silly. Flair was and still is the man to beat when it comes to titles (although after this latest thing with Umaga, Flair needs to have a little discussion with Vince about how he needs to be used properly).
The point of all of this? Well, if you were a young wrestler trying to decide which pathway to take, my recommendation would be to start with , start with three little letters E..........C.........W, and just see where it goes from there. SO until Goldust starts calling me asking for career advice, keep reading.....sincerely the Novak Notebook.
It wasn't good, by any usage of the word. There was too much dead time. The stripper was great to look at, but she worked a bra worse than I do (no I don't crossdress). It also took too much time, and there was no point to any of it. Recapping Taz v Lawler was another waste of time. A zombie and a vampire? Okay, we know we're on the sci-fi channel, but is that something we need to be reminded of that?
Kurt Angle, Edge, and the Big Show along with Cena popping up made this RAW LITE. I like the idea of Big Show going to ECW because he hasn't had the best of luck since he left WCW. He can use this as a new start, and maybe Heyman can turn him into the big badass he should be. I understand where the rest are coming from, and my guess is Angle is going to be the new Tazz. I do have a problem with people complaining about Angle leaving and he's still a WWE star. True, but nobody complained when Hall and Nash left WWF for WCW. Crushing Justin Credible wasn't something I was thrilled with. It could've been a longer match, and Credible could've represented himself well.
It did look like McMahon's fingerprints were all over this. I have a serious problem if that continues, because he never handled the Hardcore division very well, and he won't do well with this. If this was something to just get it started, fine, but it can't keep going like this. Sabu won the battle royal, although Show had a great run. It wasn't pretty, but then the whole show was like that.
That being said, ECW is back. It may not have had a great first night, but it did have a first night back. So it can go up from there. Not only that, they brought back Roadkill, Danny Doring, Justin Credible, Al Snow(with Head), and the FBI. It was great to see them, and like I said it was a start.
The people who complained, just look at the ppvs and WWE v ECW. Those were great productions and the ppv had tremendous matches. Hopefully, it was just a case of the jitters, and the fact that everyone was working for three straight days. Also it looked as if some of it was thrown together, and some of those guys probably hadn't worked for quite awhile.
Overall, I don't think it was the case of gloom and doom that everyone is painting it out to be. The thing everyone has to remember is that this isn't going to be the old ECW, and it couldn't ever become the old ECW even if it came back under different circumstances. It still looks better than TNA (which is something TNA needs to worry about), and I'm sure in time it will find it's footing and become a good show. Hopefully, they can lose the sci-fi angle and concentrate on wrestling.
But remember, it isn't going to be like it used to be. Those wrestlers are older, some have moved on, and some have sadly passed away. It's under a corporate ownership, so forget completely cutting edge. But as I pointed out to my friend, McMahon is going to want to reach out to more than three thousand fans, and in order to do that, you have to broaden the appeal of the show. The stakes are higher, and three thousand fans in a bingo hall isn't going to be enough.
Another reason that it won't be like it was is because it was already done. The freshness is gone. We've seen Raven v Sandman, RVD v Lynn, Funk v Foley, Public Enemy v The Eliminators, Tazz v Sabu. You can't possibly top some of the original and fresh angles they had the first time. Besides, the product itself was fresh, because nothing in this country had been seen that was like ECW. If anyone wants to remember the last few years of ECW, it wasn't even like the old ECW. By that time, the stars had mostly left, both WWF and WCW had hardcore divisions, Backyard wrestling was starting up, XPW was trying to compete, so ECW was becoming part of the establishment. So, the fact that everyone remembers ECW so fondly is something that is distorted each day it slips further into the past.
Most people don't remember when ECW started back in 1995. It was more of a local phenomenon than anything else, and most people's recollection doesn't really kick in until 1997. By that point, some people had already left and some who jumped on the bandwagon didn't even know guys like Mysterio, Benoit, Guerrero, Malenko, and Jericho were in ECW. By 1998 and into 1999, it became the counter-programming to the WCW and the WWF. So, it had a cult following and fans were rabid and very knowledgable about wrestling. They didn't let the wrestlers get away with anything and let them know if they weren't happy with the performances. However, it started fading in 2000 and once it was television, that was pretty much the end of it. I know I went to 5 or so shows in Pittsburgh between 1998-2000. The quality of the shows was always good, but by the end they just didn't have the star power.
They have a chance to really take ECW someplace they never were able to attain on their own. Here's hoping they succeed, because I'd like to see something other than WWE and an occasional TNA program on television. They need to get the quality up however, and they need to do it fast if they're going to keep any fans who were curious about the new ECW. They may give the show another chance or two, but it won't be much more than that. They're not going to have much leeway. Fans will tune out quick, and it will take them some time before they would tune back in.
In my opinion, which is the only thing that matters in this whole column, is wait and see how it all turns out. Don't whine and complain. Be glad you have something to whine and complain about. Just give it a few shows and see what happens. If you don't like it, give it a few shows to see if it grows on you. If you have problems with it, see if there's anything you like about it. Just don't compare it to the old ECW, because that isn't fair. In old ECW, Terry Funk could actually get into the ring on his own. Compare it to the later days of ECW, or TNA and see if it holds up, but please give it some time to get it's feet under it.
Well, until I can't take it anymore and run amok with a steel chair....keep reading
Now let's get one thing straight before we tackle this subject. I have no problem looking at scantily clad women, if they're even wearing that much. I drooled for years over Stacy Kiebler, and will continue to do so, but since she is no longer in wrestling I will go to my next favorite Diva, Maria. I would not mind one bit seeing her in next to nothing, or just plain nothing at all. I would enjoy that, and it wouldn't bother me in the slightest.
For all those women out there who want to whine and complain about the women being exploited, I have two words for you......puh-lease. They are getting far more exposure (no pun intended-well okay maybe it was intended, but what are you going to do about it?) and paid lots more money than girls who aren't on tv doing and showing a hell of a lot more than them. And besides, the WWE has no problems showing a 60 year old ass, the stinkface from a four hundred pound man, and mooning is a right of passage of sorts on this program, so the door definitely swings both ways here.
My main problem with this three year old ritual is that it is the stupidest thing on television. Die hard wrestling fans don't want it on, because there is never a point to it, and the ones who catch wrestling occasionally don't know what all the fuss is about. Why watch that when you can watch Runway Models, America's Top Models, the Playboy Channel, The Girl's Next Door, or one of Britney Spears' old videos. Of course these girls are smoking and they are hot and great to look at, but look how wonderful the first two winners are doing in the WWE. Chrissy Hemme is already gone, and Ashley is on her way out after getting demoted to Smackdown. It is funny that I mention Maria, because she was on the show, and she didn't win but it certainly looks like she is going to have the longest tenure of any of these girls.
This whole Diva Search makes about as much sense as the Tough Enough program. Remember that whole mess. Maven actually lasted some time, I will give the Devil his due. He worked hard and he tried, but he was never going to get past that whole winner of a competition stigmata. It is kind of funny when you think about it. People actually looked at him as a fake wrestler. Lots of irony there. Other than Maven, the rest of the programs produced nothing and weren't even memorable. What's the most memorable thing been about the Diva programs? The one that sticks out with me is the disaster of the girls trying to ask Kamala out on a date. It was hilarious the first time when it was Kamala, but it got old real quick, and you could hear a pin drop in the arena before they even finished the segment. That was a train wreck from beginning to end.
All in all, the Diva search is starting and I'm already bored. We're going to get the free boob and butt shows, which are great, but everyone watches for the same reason I do. Wardrobe malfunctions. Kinda like watching NASCAR for the crashes. You want to see something pop out where it shouldn't. That's always fun. And this year they have an actualy Playboy model, so you know the ante has been upped with that pick. But the girls are cute, and they are forgettable. Can you name all of them? A few are named Jen or Jennifer or something, so you can't go wrong yelling out that name. But it's a shame they trod these girls out there, make them do stupid stuff, and cut out valuable program time they could be giving to someone like a Charlie Haas, who can actually wrestle. That is my main gripe I guess. Taking away time from the wrestlers with something that has nothing to do with wrestling. Why not just show a girl going into and coming back from commercials, then you can vote who you like at the end of the evening? It would make more sense, and it wouldn't take hardly any time away from the wrestlers. But no, the WWE has to try and create a program for these girls, and have them do some of the stupidest things this side of Fear Factor. Just plain silly if you ask me.
Now some other loose ends to tie up....
Do ya think RVD drops the belt if he doesn't get caught with drugs? Although I love RVD, I have no problems with the WWE punishing him this way, but it does make me wonder what they would do if it had been Stone Cold, Rock, or Hogan in their prime?
Speaking of Divas...is Lita really going to come back and wrestle? If she does, I hope she stays to mat wrestling, because for awhile there it seemed like every time she went to do something, she was getting hurt. I like Lita alot and think she has a world of talent, going all the way back to her ECW days, but she's been hurt way too often and she needs to pull back if she's going to go back to wrestling with the women.
Seeing the Highlanders and the way they were being promoted reminded me of the good old days when the WWE had an act and they didn't quite know what to do with them. It was almost like an Outback Jack flashback. We'll see if they have better results.
Kilts, bagpipes, it didn't take Ross and Lawler long to mention Piper. Wonder if he'll show up with these two down the road?
So the Rock is doing a reality based movie about down on their luck kids, and a football program is their only hope. Hmmm....has this idea been done to death lately or what? Besides, how many more Friday Night Lights, Remember the Titans, and Rudy movies do we need? Did I even mention there is one coming out based on the fan that got a tryout with the Eagles back in 1976 when Dick Vermeil was the headcoach. If it wasn't for the Rock, this movie would barely make it on the Hallmark channel.
Nacho Libre is a funny movie, with a few misses in it. Since Jack Black and his partner are "jobbers" without even realizing it, it would've been funnier if they would've put real jobbers like Barry Horowitz in the movie, and had them pin Black. Most people wouldn't have gotten the joke, but wrestling fans would've thought that to be very funny indeed.
I'm glad DX is back, and I fully expect them to be wilder and crazier than before. That has already started to play itself out a bit, but I think things are going to get even better as weeks move along. McMahon has no fear about putting anything on television, and more things go than the last time they were on, especially cable. As long as a bulk of the raunchiness happens after ten, expect anything and everything from them.
I like having three people involved for the title. It makes it more interesting and increases possibilities down the road.
Who has slipped more into obscurity? Brock Lesnar or Goldberg? Brock is still young and can recover, and Goldberg has done a few shows on tv as well as movies, but for two men who were big stars, they sure disappeared fast didn't they? Shows that sometimes that attitude they had doesn't translate well to the real world, and people simply won't deal with you if they don't have to.
Debating whether I would want a stinkface or a bucking bronco more for Torrie Wilson. Tough call, but I might have to go with the old Sean Waltman move.
Wonder who if anyone will be coming back to join DX. Chyna and Sean Waltman, who didn't exactly leave on the best of terms. McMahon has had a way of getting by that in the past, but I wonder if either would add anything to the program. I'm guessing Roaddog and Billy Gunn for the obvious, and maybe Hall and Nash if things could be worked out between all of them. Then the real click would be together again for the first time.
Here's my prediction for the Diva Search. Some girl will win......oh....you want me to be more specific...well, okay, if you insist. The girl who agrees to do Playboy the fastest is going to win the Diva Search. My guess is it will be one of the cute blondes, or the former/future Playboy model.
Okay, the second and third week of ECW was a vast improvement over the first week. Although I'm sensing some trends that hopefully won't continue to repeat themselves (sandman beating snot out of a nobody, big show beating snot out of dreamer, sabu leading off show with decent match, show ending with mix of ECW and WWE wrestlers, kelly trying to strip and cut off), but it was an improvement none the less. Hopefully, things will start moving in the right direction, and they can start to develop some serious feuds and slowly fade WWE out of the picture. That would be nice if they could be a stand alone entity. If you don't think it can be done, just look over at Smackdown. They rarely cross over to RAW anymore and when they do, it's a big deal. McMahon does keep them seperate for the most part, but he did involve RAW a lot at first, until Smackdown was up and running. It looks like he's doing the same thing with ECW. He's probably interested to see what the numbers will look lik e once WWE isn't a major part of the program anymore. I'm actually kind of interested to, but to be honest the Sci-Fi channel will take anything it can get it's hands on that shows any potential to draw ratings, so ECW will probably have a long leash. That's a good thing, because then they will have an opportunity to carve out their own identity and Heyman may have a chance to work a little of his old magic. It will never be like it was, but it could still work.
Well, until the McMahon's come knock, knock, knockin' on my door for advice
First, there are a few people not on the list. Undertaker, Jeff Jarrett, Stephanie McMahon, Bruiser Brody, Stone Cold Steve Austin and Abdullah the Butcher. They didn't look at tag-teams either, but they did have a wide array of stars ranging from the 60s to present day. Some of them I agree with, some I don't.
Of course the number one villain of all-time is Roddy Piper. That I whole-heartedly agree with. He did more in his couple of years as the top heel than any other heel could ever hope to achieve. He had the whole Rock n' Roll community hating him, he body-slammed Dave Wolf, turned Lou Albano into a good guy and started turning the WWF into a bigtime player against NWA/WCW. Hulk Hogan and Roddy Piper single-handedly started the Wrestlemania revolution. All of that was done within two years! Roddy Piper actually went on to be a face a lot longer than a heel. He was the only man to be voted most hated and then most popular wrestler in two consecutive years.
The rest of the top ten are 2 Vince McMahon, 3 HHH, 4 Superstar Billy Graham, 5 Freddie Blassie, 6 The Rock, 7 Nature Boy Buddy Rogers, 8 Bobby Heenan, 9 JBL, and Ted DiBiase. Some of that I agree with; namely HHH, Blassie, Vinnie Mac, and the Weasel. I think Billy Graham and Ted DiBiase and Buddy Rogers should be on the list, but they are too high on the list. I can't even believe JBL is on the list.
Like any list, it is a list that is up for debate, but it is a lot of fun to argue who goes where. Most on the list should be on the list, but there are a few that should never even be on the list. Brian Pillman, Jerry Lawler, Terry Funk, Harley Race, Nikolai Volkoff, Honkytonk Man, and the above JBL should not be on the list. I mean how can Jake Roberts not be on the list and any of those guys on it. Pillman, Lawler, Funk, and Race are notorious heels but most of them did not make their names in the WWE. Most did it with the NWA and Lawler did in Memphis. If it would have been heels of all-time, then I would've been okay with them, but why not Owen Hart, Jake Roberts, IRS, Haystack Calhoun, One Man Gang, Big Show, Chris Benoit, Stephanie McMahon, Diesel, Razor Ramon, New Age Outlaws, and many others could have been on the list before the guys mentioned above.
The only people on the list that are in the WWE are the two McMahons, HHH, JBL, Ric Flair, Edge, Kane, Lita, Jerry Lawler, Mickie James, and Randy Orton. The one on there that would strike some people as odd, yet I find completely justified is Mickie James. She hasn't been in the WWE for very long, but she has made a tremendous impact. I would've put Chyna in there for the how she started in the WWE and how she was a big part in D-Generation X. But Mickie James has had a huge impact since she started, and she can wrestle too. She's crazy and she seems to be willing to do anything. The licks and smacks are very reflective of that.
HHH was number three on the list, and he should've been two or three. I totally agree with the move, even though I am not the biggest fan. He has been huge in the WWE for ten years now, and he always is a good foil. To Steve Austin and the Rock, he was a huge important part of their run. He was a great foil and it played out perfectly well.
Vinnie Mac as number two was something was a surprise. He isn't a wrestler or a manager, but he has been a nasty SOB for ten years. Since he sold out Bret Hart, he has been a big part of the WWE, but he has one advantage the others don't. He owns the company so he can make himself as bad as he wants to be. He doesn't have to worry about writers dumbing down his character (Kurt Angle), turning him into a face (Roddy Piper) or has to worry about retiring (Jesse Ventura).
Overall, it is a fun read and brings back some cool memories. It was a lot of fun, and it is up for a big time debate. Roddy Piper is the number one baddie of all-time though and it is a colorful list to say the list. It was quite a good read and worth the price of admission. Well, until Trish decides to throw away this ridiculous idea of getting married and stalking me
Rowdy Roddy Piper and the Nature Boy Ric Flair win the tag team titles. Combined age is nearly 110 years old, if not older. Pretty much double what the combined age of the team they beat. Now while it is great for nostalgia it doesn't make much sense if they're trying to push the Spirit Squad whatsoever. I loved it when they won, to see titles around their waists once again, but it just had to be short-lived to give it any credibility at all. You can't have guys like Orton and Edge losing to them time and again, no matter how many times Degeneration X inferes in the match. It was a nice blast from the past, but it had to end sometime.
Now Chris Benoit takes quite a bit of time off, yet when he comes back, the best he can do is the US Championship belt? With the Heavyweight belt held by King Booker, and the only real challenger being Batista, you would think they would've thrown Benoit in the mix, considering his past with Booker. It would make it much more interesting to add the Heavyweight feud to their already longstanding feud. Instead he gets to wrestle Chavo Guerrero in the latest installment of how we can ruin Eddie Guerrero's name even further. It might be the best way for Vicky Guerrero to keep her family floating financially, which is fine, but let's just let Chavo wrestle for himself and the Guerrero name, without Eddie's ghost hanging over everything.When Owen Hart died, Bret had one match to commemorate his memory, and then that was it. Everyone moved on. I'm not saying Eddie or Owen should be forgotten about, however they should not be major plot points either.
Was watching the new Piper DVD and it was great to see alot of the old Piper stuff. My major complaint is that they cover a lot of his career, but they kind of gloss over his transition from major villain to major face. He was the only one ever to be voted top heel one year and top face the very next year. It really hadn't happened before that and it has happened a little since. Austin, Rock, and even HHH have flip flopped since then, but Piper was the first major rule breaker to do that. The first disc covers his life, the second was matches, and the last was Piper's Pits. They didn't go over the little vignettes, him mooning Rick Rude, so Rude would lose to the Ultimate Warrior, causing Rude to feud with Piper. They didn't go over Piper coming to the ring to save Hogan (with a crutch no less), and it didn't cover Piper tag teaming with Hogan. I guess they didn't want to show Piper actually getting more cheers than Hogan. What the discs do show was that Piper was a force in the world of wrestling, no matter where he went. It wasn't as complete as it could've been (no-showing his Georgia years, barely covering his Portland years, showing his dog collar match and that was about it from NWA years, not even showing something like his match with Bruiser Brody, more interviews with other people would've been fun too) but it was very interesting to say the least. I would've loved to see what the fourth disc contained but oh well.
Now Stacy Kiebler has been gone for awhile, saying she all kinds of options and things she could do. Has anyone heard from her? What are her plans? I hope she comes back and does some different things, because she is amazing and I absolutely love her. I think she's great, and I will watch her in anything she does (as evidenced by the fact I did watch her in Dancing with the Stars). I'm just not sure that her disappearing is a good idea. There are many young gorgeous faces in Hollywood, and entertainment in general. In the WWE, she was a big fish in a small pond, and she was constantly in the public eye. Out there on her own, she has to strike while the iron is hot, and since we last saw her, there has already been another whole season of Dancing with the Stars, and still no Stacy. I'm not saying that she isn't planning anything, but the longer she's away, the more the general public will forget about her.
I love Edge and Randy Orton teaming together, even if it is short term. Edge is a great heel, and really good with a microphone. Orton needs some polish in that area, but fans just hate him anyway. He has a great body, and he is really cocky with his birthright attitude. It's a great combination, and it really gives DX some competition. The question is where does DX go after this feud? I mean it will end, even if they drag it out over a length of time, but eventually it will end. What will happen to DX after that? I'm not too sure, but at least the two guys look like they're having fun. I guess as long as the fans keep buying the t-shirts and keep cheering for them, they'll keep them around. I just don't know what kinds of feuds they'll have after this.
I read on the retro recently that Angle wondered aloud about HHH being in the tv commercials. Now, even though HHH doesn't drink beer, I don't think doing a commercials means you have to tell the truth. I seriously doubt half the people pitching commercials actually uses the product that they pitch for. Angle suggested himself or Steve Austin. Now I agree that Austin would've been very entertaining in those commercials, but let's also be fair about this. HHH has done commercials already, and has some national exposure. I don't think it was completely favortism as it was someone the public might already know. I know a lot of non-wrestling fans who know who HHH is. So it isn't such a big deal that HHH is doing those commercials, and let's be honest, he is quite good in them as well.
Well, that's it for now, so until Trish Stratus comes to her senses and leaves her marriage for me, keep reading
First off, it doesn't paint anyone in a really great light. Verne Gagne, who is a legend, comes off a bit as a whiner who put everything into his company and eventually lost it all. His son Greg is a little bit of a whiner too, and he comes off as riding his dad's coattails and not being able to live up to the family name.
Next, Vince McMahon comes off nice, but Vince Jr. comes off as power hungry and stealing people from other promotions, not to mention he had some under handedness in some of his dealings. He comes up with some excuses, but they aren't very believable, and he doesn't really help himself at all.
The only one who sounds good out of the whole thing is Hulk Hogan, and Vince doesn't want to hear that either. Once you see the DVD and the promos that Hogan cut in the AWA, you do realize that Hogan had more to do with Hulkamania than McMahon. That is something else Vince doesn't want to hear. Now that I did a quick overview, let's go through the DVD a bit more thorough.
I thought it was a very interesting DVD about a promotion that personally I didn't know a whole lot about. I remember Lawler being the title holder, but not much beyond that. When I started to watch wrestling in 1983, you had the WWF and the NWA as the top two promotions. The AWA was still around, and I do remember catching a little bit of it on ESPN, but I can't tell you much about it. This was a great DVD for people like me who saw a lot of these stars in their days in the WWF and wanted to see where they started. There was quite a bit of information, and I didn't really know they had been around as long as they were. I knew about some of the big stars, such as Hogan, Ventura, Adonis and the Road Warriors, but the behind the scenes stuff was fascinating.
I had heard of Verne Gagne watching enough wrestling through my life, and it was interesting to see how he got his start. I knew he was a giant in the world of professional wrestling, but after watching the DVD, I think he was a bit bigger than what he is given credit for. Unfortunately, I think the things that made him great hurt him down the road. He seemed to be a bit stubborn and I think that really hurt him in the end. But still, he wasa visionary and his accomplishments can't be ignored.
I didn't know Eric Bishoff got his start in the AWA, and seeing him basically as a young kid was pretty entertaining. I also didn't know that Gagne tried to bring in Bruiser Brody and Abdullah the Butcher. It was in the waning days of AWA, and he was trying to bring the fans back. The whole Superbrawl thing was his idea, but it was interesting to see how it really didn't work the way they wanted it to.
Vince McMahon comes off as a man who was trying to buy all the talent he could. He would let them develop somewhere else, and then buy them out. It looks like he paid Hogan to sit at home rather than go fill his commitments to the AWA. He was just starting to climb up near the top in the AWA, and McMahon plucked him out, then paid him not to show up. McMahon denies this, but both Hogan and Gagne tell the same story, so that doesn't exactly paint McMahon in a nice picture.
I also thought Vince and Hulk had created Hulkamania. It was alive and well in the AWA, which is something I didn't know. Actually, if you watch the DVD, it basically says that Hulk leaving was the start of the end of the AWA. If that is true and not hype, because it seems like Verne won't say it outright, then Hulk certainly is the biggest name in the sport. He is already, but he is even bigger than that. How many other wrestlers can you say that basically ended one promotion and launched another, then turned around later in his career and relaunched yet another. Hulk did all that, so I have to say that he was the man in wrestling. Andre came and went wherever he wanted, and he was the star in wrestling, but I think he past the torch to the right guy.
The matches are great, because it is stuff you rarely see. seeing Nick Bockwinkle with Heenan as his manager, as well as seeing the East-West connection in action (if you don't know who that is, see the DVD) was something great. The matches didn't go back as far as they could've, I'm sure but it was a nice sprinkling throughout the history of the promotion. They could probably do a whole two disc set with just matches from the AWA.
Overall, I say it is definitely worth watching for any fan of wrestling. You will see many faces you know, as well as some you've heard of that you may not know. You'll see guys like Heenan and Adrian Adonis in their younger days doing what they do best. It was great and a lot of fun to watch. Like I said, I have to admit that Hulk Hogan is the man in wrestling, and he is the true icon in professional wrestling, although I hate admitting it. But it is a shame that the WWE isn't promoting this harder, because this is an important part of wrestling history, and it needs to be seen by any wrestling fan who enjoys the history of the sport. I highly recommend it, and everyone should see it....so until Maria comes to my place and interviews me...keep reading
There are a few stories that didn't make the cut, such as the departure of Trish Stratus and Stacey Kiebler from the WWE. K-Fed popping up to challenge John Cena, as well as Samoa Joe holding the X title for the year. Piper and Flair actually holding tag titles, even if it was for a short time, as well as Piper having lymphoma. Tazz goes with Styles, actually creating a really good announcing team in JBL and Michael Cole by accident was a pretty interesting story as well, but none made my top five list. Even RVD ditching the tour for the troops, while a story worth discussing doesn't make my top five either. It really isn't a wrestling story, just a discussion for another time. I'm sure my top five list will not be the same as the five you might see as the top stories, but these are the five I think were the most important.
Number 5 Story; The WWE starts to make movies on their own. I think they did this for several reasons. The first and most important is the possibility of keeping their talent on their roster. Roddy Piper left after Wrestlemania III to make movies and take a break from wrestling, and they lost the Rock as well to Hollywood. The WWE looks as this as a natural extension of what they do in the ring as well as keeping their talent in wrestling perhaps a little longer. "See No Evil" was a modest success to say the least, a bit of a bigger hit on DVD. "The Marine" wasn't as successful as they would've hoped, and it may put a cramp in future endeavors, but if they keep the costs low, they may be able to pull off some small successes here and there. But the fact they took the next step from sports entertainment to actual entertainment to me was big news. We shall see if they keep the stir going into the new year.
Number 4 Story; ECW returns. It wasn't the same, and it wasn't going to be the same. However, ECW came back at least in some form, and they have had some good matches. They have also given Terry Funk, Sabu, the Sandman, and Tommy Dreamer some face time on television. It also gave also-rans in WWE one last chance to make a name for themselves in the world of professional wrestling. I think it has been hit and miss, as I don't think one hour is very long each week, however they also don't have the talent to go much further than that. They look like they don't have much depth, and it is going to run dry of ideas fairly soon. I think it could grow a little, but they have to have the right talent and mix to keep it going. I don't know if they have that right now. They made a lot of mistakes early, especially focusing on Kelly Kelly, and her botched strip-teases every week. However, having the Big Show as champ as well as showcasing C.M. Punk have been really good ideas that keep ECW from being unwatchable.
Number 3 Story; TNA finally gets to television. It had been on tv for awhile, but it was as such odd hours, that few people were watching it. TNA finally gets a little push with a move to earlier hours on Thursdays, and it will allow people to make a better judgement about the whole product once they get to see it a few times. Now, it has to be pointed out that ECW made the move to TNN (or whatever the hell it was called then) and they fell completely apart. Then WWE moved from USA to TNN (which became Spike). Now while the WWE was usually the biggest draw on Spike, they were never drawing the numbers they had been on USA. Now look where the WWE went to...hmmm...back to USA? The question will be whether or not TNA will fall apart like the other two did, or will they actually benefit from being on Spike TV. I think they will greatly benefit from being there, since they weren't really being watched before. Spike TV isn't exactly getting any huge ratings from anything else, so they can stay with TNA as long as they need to before they get a bigger audience. Only time will tell, but we'll have to wait and see.
Number 2 Story; The return of a legend. Now this wasn't a return, like Roger Clemens. Sting returned after a long absence from the ring. Years he had been gone, and he came back to TNA and immediately stirred the pot. He looks like he's in pretty good shape and is having fun in the ring again. He may be able to help TNA compete a little bit with WWE, but just the fact that he's back and competing on a high level is a story. The reason it isn't number one is because it had been rumored for some time, and it actually was leaked before it happened. The other reason it isn't the number one story......
Kurt Angle leaving the WWE and heading to TNA! Who saw this coming. When Angle was in the WWE, he was placed on the ECW roster, and it looked like he was actually going to try and fit in, even though he had issues with Paul Heyman in the past. Still, he was a trooper and went over to ECW. Then he started having back problems again (which had started while he was still in the WWE), and suddenly he was leaving the WWE/ECW for personal reasons. Nobody suspected anything, and actually not much was said by either said. Then without warning, Kurt Angle was popping up in TNA and actually wrestling! No forwarning, nobody knew, nobody said a word. Considering this day and age of instant news on the computer, it was a pretty well kept secret. It was a shock and a surprise, because Angle had never seemed to be on bad terms with the WWE, and nobody saw it coming. TNA pulled off one of the biggest surprises in recent wrestling history, and they pulled it off well. They have some surprises and interest in their product, at least enough to have people watching and wondering what was going to happen next. We'll see what they do with the momentum that Sting and Angle have given them. Can they actually compete with the WWE or is it just a far off dream? Well, until my dream of Maria and Stacey Kiebler knocking on my door come true...
Vince McMahon was also promoting this whole tag team match with Batista and Undertaker taking on Shawn Michaels and John Cena as something that has never been done before. I don't know if that is entirely sure, because I do recall many times he has had opponents team up together in matches. It might not have been opponents for the world heavyweight title (although I think a few of them have been) but it is hardly a groundbreaking match. I certainly wouldn't be promoting it as such.
Has anyone just looked at No Way Out and wondered why they just didn't get rid of the whole ppv. Sure they do get some money from it, but it is one of those ppv that is totally useless. Not much happens other than to springboard things toward Wrestlemania. Look at this year, where you have the opponents teaming together. It is a meaningless match, nothing is at stake other than to further the feuds for Wrestlemania. Why can't they just shelve the whole No Way Out, put on some really tight shows that feature these matches, and everyone will get even more amped for the big dance?
ECW originals? How many are truly left? You could barely have a Survivor Series match with them; Sandman, Tommy Dreamer, Sabu, RVD, and Balls Mahoney. Almost everyone else is a newbie. And now they're going to have a match for the heavyweight title; Lashley v Kennedy, and not one ECW original is involved. I realize a lot of the ECW originals aren't around any longer (either dead or retired, or have issues with McMahon) but I'm sure you could have brought a few more back. Perry Saturn, maybe try and get Lance Storm back, and why not keep Justin Credible around? You could try and patch things up with Shane Douglas at least for a little while and see what happens. I don't know if there is much you can do with New Jack, since he is a law suit waiting to happen. I think Raven is still under contract to TNA so that may not work. Steve Richards and Blue Meanie could have come back, along with some of the cruiserweights. They tried bringing back some of the FBI, but not all of it. And they're only bringing back some of these guys like Mike Awesome, Terry Funk, Tajiri and whatnot for one show here and there. That is something I don't understand. I can understand if you don't want to keep all of them around and on the payroll, but why on Earth would you only keep them around for one show, when you have such a limited roster to begin with? That was one of the problems with the original ECW was that they didn't have much of a roster, and they kept having to face each other over and over again. Now, they're going to face the same problem, although Vince seems to be circulating people through ECW pretty regularly. I would still like to see more of the ECW originals. I'm still not sure why they call it ECW when you need to have Extreme Rules matches. It doesn't make sense to me but what can you do?
TNA is still up and running, and although they have brought in some big name talents such as Kurt Angle and Sting, they are still a blip on the radar screen. They have forced Vince McMahon to rethink the way he does business. He's keeping people such as Paul Heyman under contract just so they won't jump to TNA. After what happened with Kurt Angle, he's probably going to rethink what he does with some wrestlers. TNA has made a bit of an impact, but it has a long way to go before it is even on the same level as ECW, much less the WWE. It has made strides, but with Vince Russo influencing all of the scripts, it's hard to say how far they can go. It has turned more soap opera than wrestling, and they took characters I thought were pretty cool (like Abyss) and tried to turn them into something else. Vince Russo is trying to give him something along the line the Undertaker's back story. He's trying to create this whole world that true wrestling fans don't care about and the casual f ans don't know enough about TNA to tune into for the back story. When Vince Russo was running the storylines in the WWF, it was already established and well known, so he could play with the stories. He's trying the same thing now, except it is in a much smaller company that isn't as well know. It is still a good alternative to the WWE, and maybe with in a few years it will rise to that level. It's hard to say with the Russo factor. He might be able to help them, but he could hurt them too. We'll have to wait and see.
That about wraps up another Novak Notebook
The Notebook has recently tried Now I know what you're saying. How can you read two books at the same time without confusing characters. Well, here's an example; the book I'm reading at work right now is about a vampire detective who is investigating a case of nymphomania, and the book at home is called "Confederates in the Attic". I doubt that I'll be able to confuse those two if I try. I've been reading books on the Presidents, the real Judas and the Supreme Court. One of the other books I've read is the main source for this article. I started reading Mick Foley's new book "Hardcore Diaries" on a Sunday and finished it by that Thursday. It was a great read and I recommend it highly. It was an interesting book, and one I am not at all surprised that the WWE allowed to be published. Vince McMahon does like controversy, which is true, but there is enough ass kissing in the book to cover any of the controversy it brings up. Be that as it may, it was a fascinating book from the perspective of telling the story of telling the story. Very few times are the masses allowed behind the scenes and what all goes on to continue everything forward. While those who have been following wrestling for a long time probably have a good idea of what telling the story entails, but this goes even further than any of us are allowed. It was compelling and told with quite a bit of emotion as well. Mick starts in early 2006, and basically carries the book through his match with Edge against Terry Funk and Tommy Dreamer. Mick got quite a number of things right, but one thing he seems to have missed time and again is underestimating the fans. I honestly don't think he believes they are stupid, but I do think he doesn't give them enough credit sometimes, especially when it comes to history. He continually mentions how they have to build up Funk and Dreamer as main eventers so the ppv comes off well. Well, the first thing is the ppv had Cena v Van Damm as the main event, so you didn't exactly have to carry the ppv. There were no titles at stake, and other than Edge's reputation as a main event heel, nothing else was at stake. The match could've really stunk, but I don't think most people have been expecting as much out of ECW since it has come back, so anything above those modest expectations is considered a success. Now that I got the main criticism out of the way, the book was wonderful. My only question leaving the book was wondering how people who don't have the pull of a Mick Foley come to Vince McMahon with ideas and suggestions. I would've like to have seen how Mick used to suggest things and how he does now. I'm sure he has a little more stroke now than he did when he first started in the WWF. Other than that it was interesting to see what Mick would suggest and how the final package looked. Things seemed to change like night and day. It was pretty wild to see Mick Foley suggest things, people agree with the suggestion and yet it continually would get changed. More interesting aspects were how Mick felt after a match, what he would have to do to get up for the next one, and the style of the promos. I actually remember when Terry Funk said he knew why Mick turned on ECW, and then asked Mick why he turned. Mick praised Stephanie McMahon, said a lot of nice things about Vince, was very critical of him as well. He said some interesting things about Ric Flair, hinted about DX, ripped on Al Snow and now Test, while praising the Divas. I think he managed to mention most of them. He seems like he actually did change his tune a little about ECW. I wouldn't say he regrets his ECW run, but I do think he questions it at times. I also like his stories in the book that weren't related to wrestling. I'll admit some of the ones about his family didn't exactly hold my interest, but there were enough stories that were either fascinating or interesting enough to keep reading. It also added the human element to the man, as well as describe everything some of these wrestlers do.
So while Mick Foley said it is his third autobiography, it really isn't. It is more like a "half a year in the life of Mick" give or take. It is a very good read, but I'm not sure it is as all that shocking that they are making it out to be. If you truly want shocking, you have to read a book that was not published by the WWE. Even though Vince McMahon will allow a lot of criticism, which I give him credit for, he probably won't allow as much as some want to heap on him. That said, Mick is a damn good writer in that he manages to flesh Vince out a bit too, and make him a bit more human, which is nice. Despite Vince being something of a cartoon character on television, it is nice to know some of the more human qualities behind the man. So overall, it was well worth the read, although the read was over pretty quickly for me. So until Stacy Kiebler and Maria get in a catfight to see who hangs out with me....keep reading.....
The Undertaker once again Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with Edge being involved with the dropping of the title, but I think they missed a really good opportunity with this injury. My suggestion would've been to have Batista win the belt after they beat the hell out of each other. Mark Henry comes down, attacks Batista just to get him out of the way, then really goes to town on the Undertaker. Edge comes down while Batista is down, does his thing and wins the belt. He even goes over and clocks the Undertaker for good measure. He walks up the ramp, braggin about getting one over on everyone again. As he is leaving, Kennedy comes out and gets him from behind, like Edge did to him. Everything would come full circle. What would be cool at that point would be you have something that RAW was doing with Michaels, Orton and Edge chasing Cena. Only, you would have Kennedy, Batista and Henry, and even the Undertaker when he came back. It would be interesting and they could move in a variety of directions for months until the Undertaker did come back. Instead, you have Edge v Batista, even though Batista lost the title and never got it back. He's thrown into the mix, because they have nothing else right now. They didn't set it up right, and instead of Batista trying to get a title back that he had just won, he is going after a title he couldn't take back from the dead man. Anyway, that was my suggestion. The Undertaker will be back. He always comes back. Except for when his career looked dead and buried after his American Badass days, he always comes back after an injury. He has been the one constant in the WWE for nearly twenty years. Outside of Shawn Michaels, he's had one of the longest tenures in modern organizational history. Don't forget, Shawn had four years off. Now the Undertaker has taken quite a bit of time off here and there for various injuries, but never for four years. He has one of the greatest resumes in wrestling. Now, I would I love to see Shawn Michaels v Undertaker in a long program. Two of the biggest icons left that go back to the days of Hulk Hogan, Roddy Piper and the gang. That would be cool, and would stir up lots of memories. You could talk to all of the old stars who faced either or both and they could give their opinion who would win. I think it could be really cool, and they could maybe build toward Wrestlemania. It would be the full circle thing from the very first Hell in the Cell. I think the Undertaker needs to be appreciated and celebrated. Never has a man that big been agile and been as dominant as long as the Undertaker. When his career looked over, he went back to the dead man, and ironically revived his career. Chills came back to everyone when he first returned, and he looked in better shape than ever. He moved around great and looked unstoppable. He was back and better than ever. Eventually, it will come to an end, which is a shame. In your life you will never see another Undertaker. Even when there was talk that way back, the WCW was going to try and get him, his popularity didn't fade. Bishoff reminded everyone that the Undertaker gimmick wouldn't have come with him, but that didn't stop him from having success with Razor Ramon and Diesel. I think Mark Callous would've done quite well for himself. But it never happened. Undertaker never left the WWE, and now is pretty much dictating what he does and how he does things. I'm sure there are backroom squabbles with him pulling some type of power play, but you don't hear about it too much about it like you do about HHH. He still has pull but from I've heard, he uses it correctly, for the most part. Anyway, these latest matches with Batista have shown how good the Undertaker really is. If you don't believe me, think of how many other great matches can you think of where Batista was involved? If the answer is none then you're not only. However, the Undertaker elevated the game between the two. He did it with Mankind and Shawn Michaels (Hell in the Cell), had a whole new character created because of him (Kane-who is still around by the way), and has feuded with everyone from Hulk Hogan to HHH (get it? HH to HHH? Ha, I didn't think so.) He has transcended generations and is truly a living legend in the sport. He is still a huge force to be reckoned with and he is not to be messed with. Truly one of a kind, and the one true phenom. He may not be impervious to pain anymore (from the great Gorilla), but he is still someone you don't want to meet in a dark alley.
So, until the WWE and the Undertaker go for my novel into a movie idea....keep reading....
Well, now Vince McMahon is dead.
I'm actually glad the Vince McMahon character is off the air for right now. They have been using Vince for the last ten to twelve years as a major heel in the WWE. The problem is that Vince hasn't been a great heel for the last five years or so. He's kind of become Doink the Clown of heels. He's no longer the ultimate power torturing the likes of Steve Austin and the Rock. He's been reduced to feuding with Bobby Lashley, and losing a hair v hair match.
Now I haven't always been a big fan of Vince McMahon, but you have to give the man some credit. How many other men would allow all those people to come on television and say what they really thought about him (whether it was what they completely thought about him, well that's a different matter)? Another question is how many men would do that on a supposed appreciation night? The man either has an extreme amount of confidence or he is as crazy as he has been looking lately.
While I'm glad that Vince will be off air for awhile, it does leave a few questions behind. Before we get to the questions, let's look at what this means for television. While they have been expressing sadness on WWE television this past week, let's hope that comes to a stop. I mean how much can they say they're sorry and sad that Vince is gone? I shouldn't ask because I might get an answer I'm not expecting. But it should die down, and hopefully it will get back to the wrestlers in the ring. Wrestling has always been a soap opera for people, but sometimes it gets too far away from the action in the ring and gets too involved in the soap opera aspects.
The wrestlers are the driving force behind the WWE, but with Vince they had stumbled upon something which had never been used before. The owner the federation was the enemy. Sure, they had people rail against the promoters in the past, but never had they had anything where the promoter or owner got as directly involved as Vince McMahon was doing. Once he told the man to ring the bell in the Bret Hart v Shawn Michaels match, he became public enemy number one. They could use him as an enemy against the top stars and create whole storylines around a non-wrestler. It had never happened before.
However, it is something that has run its course. He has been a stale character for some time. It was time for him to be taken off the air and let it breathe for a bit, but my question is how do they wiggle their way out of this? I mean, they killed him off! It's not like he just walked away or anything like that. They blew him up! So, do they bring him back down the road and say it was all a scam, and he was never dead? Or do they keep him off the air permanently? I seriously doubt he can stay away forever, so they have to figure out a way to bring him back that sounds believable. I don't know how they can do that, because if he was fine, he would've showed up by now! I just don't see how they're going to figure away around this.
I have a feeling this isn't going to play out the way the WWE expects it. I think they're going to try and make a heel out of whoever blew up the car, but that person is going to get cheered like one hasn't been cheered in some time. I just hope this isn't going to be drawn out as a who done it over the rest of the summer. That could be problematic if they keep breaking in with news and reports about where the investigation is going.
The other thing with this is that it decreases the serious deaths that are happening around the WWE this year. Sherri Martel is the latest to die of unknown causes at the young age of 49. This is a serious issue and problem with all of these stars dropping over for a variety of reasons, yet Vince McMahon's "death" is going to be the one everyone focuses on. Sure, his is part of a storyline, but there are real deaths happening and they are going to end up getting pushed into the background. It's sad but they are never going to come out and say anything about all of these deaths not just this year but over the past couple of years. There is a problem there when the life expectancy of a wrestler is shorter than a professional football player. Nobody says anything about it, yet the deaths keep piling up. It is real and it isn't going away anytime soon. Hopefully, someone will address it down the road, but until then, we have to deal with tributes toward the "death" of a man who is n't dead. Interesting if you ask me.
Well...until the Notebook "dies" and all of the pictures he has taken are worth quite a bit of money....keep reading
Well,it has been awhile
To be honest I am torn about Benoit. I loved watching him perform, and still am entertained by his old matches. It was a sad thing that happened, and he will be forever labeled a murderer. I think the WWE has handled the whole thing with as much class as they could. When they found out he died, they did a tribute show. When they found out what really happened, they let it rest and didn't try and exploit anything. I don't know about Jim Ross showing up at the funeral of Nancy, that does sound a little tacky, and I guess one would have to question his motives, but to be fair it isn't any different than any other company trying to protect their interests. Not showing any of Benoit's matches I also agree with, although some of them were classics. I think of Benoit and how he would have wanted to be rem
|